Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence

Samantha Capon, Jasmyn LYNCH, Nick Bond, Bruce Chessman, Jenny DAVIS, N Davidson, M Finlayson, Peter Gell, D Hohnberg, C Humphrey, R Kingsford, D Nielson, K Ward, Ralph MAC NALLY

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    70 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The concepts of ecosystem regime shifts, thresholds and alternative or multiple stable states are used extensively in the ecological and environmental management literature. When applied to aquatic ecosystems, these terms are used inconsistently reflecting differing levels of supporting evidence among ecosystem types. Although many aquatic ecosystems around the world have become degraded, the magnitude and causes of changes, relative to the range of historical variability, are poorly known. A working group supported by the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS) reviewed 135 papers on freshwater ecosystems to assess the evidence for pressure-induced non-linear changes in freshwater ecosystems; these papers used terms indicating sudden and non-linear change in their titles and key words, and so was a positively biased sample. We scrutinized papers for study context and methods, ecosystem characteristics and focus, types of pressures and ecological responses considered, and the type of change reported (i.e., gradual, non-linear, hysteretic or irreversible change). There was little empirical evidence for regime shifts and changes between multiple or alternative stable states in these studies although some shifts between turbid phytoplankton-dominated states and clear-water, macrophyte-dominated states were reported in shallow lakes in temperate climates. We found limited understanding of the subtleties of the relevant theoretical concepts and encountered few mechanistic studies that investigated or identified cause-and-effect relationships between ecological responses and nominal pressures. Our results mirror those of reviews for estuarine, nearshore and marine aquatic ecosystems, demonstrating that although the concepts of regime shifts and alternative stable states have become prominent in the scientific and management literature, their empirical underpinning is weak outside of a specific environmental setting. The application of these concepts in future research and management applications should include evidence on the mechanistic links between pressures and consequent ecological change. Explicit consideration should also be given to whether observed temporal dynamics represent variation along a continuum rather than categorically different states.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)122-130
    Number of pages9
    JournalScience of the Total Environment
    Volume534
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    freshwater ecosystem
    Aquatic ecosystems
    Ecosystems
    aquatic ecosystem
    ecosystem
    macrophyte
    marine ecosystem
    Environmental management
    Phytoplankton
    environmental management
    phytoplankton
    Lakes
    Mirrors
    appraisal
    lake
    Water
    water

    Cite this

    Capon, Samantha ; LYNCH, Jasmyn ; Bond, Nick ; Chessman, Bruce ; DAVIS, Jenny ; Davidson, N ; Finlayson, M ; Gell, Peter ; Hohnberg, D ; Humphrey, C ; Kingsford, R ; Nielson, D ; Ward, K ; MAC NALLY, Ralph. / Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2015 ; Vol. 534. pp. 122-130.
    @article{c6845d39ca874462b623a1dcafcc3ffe,
    title = "Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence",
    abstract = "The concepts of ecosystem regime shifts, thresholds and alternative or multiple stable states are used extensively in the ecological and environmental management literature. When applied to aquatic ecosystems, these terms are used inconsistently reflecting differing levels of supporting evidence among ecosystem types. Although many aquatic ecosystems around the world have become degraded, the magnitude and causes of changes, relative to the range of historical variability, are poorly known. A working group supported by the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS) reviewed 135 papers on freshwater ecosystems to assess the evidence for pressure-induced non-linear changes in freshwater ecosystems; these papers used terms indicating sudden and non-linear change in their titles and key words, and so was a positively biased sample. We scrutinized papers for study context and methods, ecosystem characteristics and focus, types of pressures and ecological responses considered, and the type of change reported (i.e., gradual, non-linear, hysteretic or irreversible change). There was little empirical evidence for regime shifts and changes between multiple or alternative stable states in these studies although some shifts between turbid phytoplankton-dominated states and clear-water, macrophyte-dominated states were reported in shallow lakes in temperate climates. We found limited understanding of the subtleties of the relevant theoretical concepts and encountered few mechanistic studies that investigated or identified cause-and-effect relationships between ecological responses and nominal pressures. Our results mirror those of reviews for estuarine, nearshore and marine aquatic ecosystems, demonstrating that although the concepts of regime shifts and alternative stable states have become prominent in the scientific and management literature, their empirical underpinning is weak outside of a specific environmental setting. The application of these concepts in future research and management applications should include evidence on the mechanistic links between pressures and consequent ecological change. Explicit consideration should also be given to whether observed temporal dynamics represent variation along a continuum rather than categorically different states.",
    keywords = "Alternative stable states, Catastrophic change, Change, Human pressures, Phase shifts, Sudden change, Thresholds, Time series",
    author = "Samantha Capon and Jasmyn LYNCH and Nick Bond and Bruce Chessman and Jenny DAVIS and N Davidson and M Finlayson and Peter Gell and D Hohnberg and C Humphrey and R Kingsford and D Nielson and K Ward and {MAC NALLY}, Ralph",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.045",
    language = "English",
    volume = "534",
    pages = "122--130",
    journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
    issn = "0048-9697",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Capon, S, LYNCH, J, Bond, N, Chessman, B, DAVIS, J, Davidson, N, Finlayson, M, Gell, P, Hohnberg, D, Humphrey, C, Kingsford, R, Nielson, D, Ward, K & MAC NALLY, R 2015, 'Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence', Science of the Total Environment, vol. 534, pp. 122-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.045

    Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence. / Capon, Samantha; LYNCH, Jasmyn; Bond, Nick; Chessman, Bruce; DAVIS, Jenny; Davidson, N; Finlayson, M; Gell, Peter; Hohnberg, D; Humphrey, C; Kingsford, R; Nielson, D; Ward, K; MAC NALLY, Ralph.

    In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 534, 2015, p. 122-130.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence

    AU - Capon, Samantha

    AU - LYNCH, Jasmyn

    AU - Bond, Nick

    AU - Chessman, Bruce

    AU - DAVIS, Jenny

    AU - Davidson, N

    AU - Finlayson, M

    AU - Gell, Peter

    AU - Hohnberg, D

    AU - Humphrey, C

    AU - Kingsford, R

    AU - Nielson, D

    AU - Ward, K

    AU - MAC NALLY, Ralph

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - The concepts of ecosystem regime shifts, thresholds and alternative or multiple stable states are used extensively in the ecological and environmental management literature. When applied to aquatic ecosystems, these terms are used inconsistently reflecting differing levels of supporting evidence among ecosystem types. Although many aquatic ecosystems around the world have become degraded, the magnitude and causes of changes, relative to the range of historical variability, are poorly known. A working group supported by the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS) reviewed 135 papers on freshwater ecosystems to assess the evidence for pressure-induced non-linear changes in freshwater ecosystems; these papers used terms indicating sudden and non-linear change in their titles and key words, and so was a positively biased sample. We scrutinized papers for study context and methods, ecosystem characteristics and focus, types of pressures and ecological responses considered, and the type of change reported (i.e., gradual, non-linear, hysteretic or irreversible change). There was little empirical evidence for regime shifts and changes between multiple or alternative stable states in these studies although some shifts between turbid phytoplankton-dominated states and clear-water, macrophyte-dominated states were reported in shallow lakes in temperate climates. We found limited understanding of the subtleties of the relevant theoretical concepts and encountered few mechanistic studies that investigated or identified cause-and-effect relationships between ecological responses and nominal pressures. Our results mirror those of reviews for estuarine, nearshore and marine aquatic ecosystems, demonstrating that although the concepts of regime shifts and alternative stable states have become prominent in the scientific and management literature, their empirical underpinning is weak outside of a specific environmental setting. The application of these concepts in future research and management applications should include evidence on the mechanistic links between pressures and consequent ecological change. Explicit consideration should also be given to whether observed temporal dynamics represent variation along a continuum rather than categorically different states.

    AB - The concepts of ecosystem regime shifts, thresholds and alternative or multiple stable states are used extensively in the ecological and environmental management literature. When applied to aquatic ecosystems, these terms are used inconsistently reflecting differing levels of supporting evidence among ecosystem types. Although many aquatic ecosystems around the world have become degraded, the magnitude and causes of changes, relative to the range of historical variability, are poorly known. A working group supported by the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS) reviewed 135 papers on freshwater ecosystems to assess the evidence for pressure-induced non-linear changes in freshwater ecosystems; these papers used terms indicating sudden and non-linear change in their titles and key words, and so was a positively biased sample. We scrutinized papers for study context and methods, ecosystem characteristics and focus, types of pressures and ecological responses considered, and the type of change reported (i.e., gradual, non-linear, hysteretic or irreversible change). There was little empirical evidence for regime shifts and changes between multiple or alternative stable states in these studies although some shifts between turbid phytoplankton-dominated states and clear-water, macrophyte-dominated states were reported in shallow lakes in temperate climates. We found limited understanding of the subtleties of the relevant theoretical concepts and encountered few mechanistic studies that investigated or identified cause-and-effect relationships between ecological responses and nominal pressures. Our results mirror those of reviews for estuarine, nearshore and marine aquatic ecosystems, demonstrating that although the concepts of regime shifts and alternative stable states have become prominent in the scientific and management literature, their empirical underpinning is weak outside of a specific environmental setting. The application of these concepts in future research and management applications should include evidence on the mechanistic links between pressures and consequent ecological change. Explicit consideration should also be given to whether observed temporal dynamics represent variation along a continuum rather than categorically different states.

    KW - Alternative stable states

    KW - Catastrophic change

    KW - Change

    KW - Human pressures

    KW - Phase shifts

    KW - Sudden change

    KW - Thresholds

    KW - Time series

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940435184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/regime-shifts-thresholds-multiple-stable-states-freshwater-ecosystems-critical-appraisal-evidence

    U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.045

    DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.045

    M3 - Article

    VL - 534

    SP - 122

    EP - 130

    JO - Science of the Total Environment

    JF - Science of the Total Environment

    SN - 0048-9697

    ER -