Regimes, Social Risks and the Welfare Mix: Unpacking Attitudes to Pensions and Childcare in Germany and the UK Through Deliberative Forums

Peter Taylor-Gooby, Jan-Ocko Heuer, Heejung Chung, Benjamin LERUTH, Steffen Mau, Katharina Zimmermann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Modern welfare regimes rest on a range of actors – state, market, family/households, employers and charities – but austerity programmes diminish the contribution of the state. While changes in this ‘welfare mix’ require support from the population, attitude studies have focused mainly on people’s views on state responsibilities, using welfare regime theory to explain differences. This paper contributes to our understanding of the welfare mix by including other providers such as the market, the family or employers, and also introduces social risk theories, contrasting new and old risks. Regime theory implies differences will persist over time, but risk theory suggests that growing similarities in certain risks may tend to promote international convergence. This article examines attitudes to the roles of state, market, family, charity/community and employer for pension and childcare in Germany and the UK. We collected data using deliberative forums, a new method in social policy research that allows citizens space to pursue extended lightly moderated discussion and permits researchers to analyse people’s justifications for their attitudes. Our research indicated patterns of convergence especially in preferences for childcare, but that regime predominates in people’s justifications for their attitudes: regime differences in attitudes are resilient.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-19
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Social Policy
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 9 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

child care
pension
welfare
regime
employer
market
population attitude
social policy
citizen
responsibility
community
family

Cite this

Taylor-Gooby, Peter ; Heuer, Jan-Ocko ; Chung, Heejung ; LERUTH, Benjamin ; Mau, Steffen ; Zimmermann, Katharina. / Regimes, Social Risks and the Welfare Mix: Unpacking Attitudes to Pensions and Childcare in Germany and the UK Through Deliberative Forums. In: Journal of Social Policy. 2019 ; pp. 1-19.
@article{fad97031031e4e2292935bbc08af3c2a,
title = "Regimes, Social Risks and the Welfare Mix: Unpacking Attitudes to Pensions and Childcare in Germany and the UK Through Deliberative Forums",
abstract = "Modern welfare regimes rest on a range of actors – state, market, family/households, employers and charities – but austerity programmes diminish the contribution of the state. While changes in this ‘welfare mix’ require support from the population, attitude studies have focused mainly on people’s views on state responsibilities, using welfare regime theory to explain differences. This paper contributes to our understanding of the welfare mix by including other providers such as the market, the family or employers, and also introduces social risk theories, contrasting new and old risks. Regime theory implies differences will persist over time, but risk theory suggests that growing similarities in certain risks may tend to promote international convergence. This article examines attitudes to the roles of state, market, family, charity/community and employer for pension and childcare in Germany and the UK. We collected data using deliberative forums, a new method in social policy research that allows citizens space to pursue extended lightly moderated discussion and permits researchers to analyse people’s justifications for their attitudes. Our research indicated patterns of convergence especially in preferences for childcare, but that regime predominates in people’s justifications for their attitudes: regime differences in attitudes are resilient.",
author = "Peter Taylor-Gooby and Jan-Ocko Heuer and Heejung Chung and Benjamin LERUTH and Steffen Mau and Katharina Zimmermann",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1017/S004727941800079X",
language = "English",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Journal of Social Policy",
issn = "0047-2794",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

Regimes, Social Risks and the Welfare Mix: Unpacking Attitudes to Pensions and Childcare in Germany and the UK Through Deliberative Forums. / Taylor-Gooby, Peter; Heuer, Jan-Ocko; Chung, Heejung; LERUTH, Benjamin; Mau, Steffen; Zimmermann, Katharina.

In: Journal of Social Policy, 09.01.2019, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regimes, Social Risks and the Welfare Mix: Unpacking Attitudes to Pensions and Childcare in Germany and the UK Through Deliberative Forums

AU - Taylor-Gooby, Peter

AU - Heuer, Jan-Ocko

AU - Chung, Heejung

AU - LERUTH, Benjamin

AU - Mau, Steffen

AU - Zimmermann, Katharina

PY - 2019/1/9

Y1 - 2019/1/9

N2 - Modern welfare regimes rest on a range of actors – state, market, family/households, employers and charities – but austerity programmes diminish the contribution of the state. While changes in this ‘welfare mix’ require support from the population, attitude studies have focused mainly on people’s views on state responsibilities, using welfare regime theory to explain differences. This paper contributes to our understanding of the welfare mix by including other providers such as the market, the family or employers, and also introduces social risk theories, contrasting new and old risks. Regime theory implies differences will persist over time, but risk theory suggests that growing similarities in certain risks may tend to promote international convergence. This article examines attitudes to the roles of state, market, family, charity/community and employer for pension and childcare in Germany and the UK. We collected data using deliberative forums, a new method in social policy research that allows citizens space to pursue extended lightly moderated discussion and permits researchers to analyse people’s justifications for their attitudes. Our research indicated patterns of convergence especially in preferences for childcare, but that regime predominates in people’s justifications for their attitudes: regime differences in attitudes are resilient.

AB - Modern welfare regimes rest on a range of actors – state, market, family/households, employers and charities – but austerity programmes diminish the contribution of the state. While changes in this ‘welfare mix’ require support from the population, attitude studies have focused mainly on people’s views on state responsibilities, using welfare regime theory to explain differences. This paper contributes to our understanding of the welfare mix by including other providers such as the market, the family or employers, and also introduces social risk theories, contrasting new and old risks. Regime theory implies differences will persist over time, but risk theory suggests that growing similarities in certain risks may tend to promote international convergence. This article examines attitudes to the roles of state, market, family, charity/community and employer for pension and childcare in Germany and the UK. We collected data using deliberative forums, a new method in social policy research that allows citizens space to pursue extended lightly moderated discussion and permits researchers to analyse people’s justifications for their attitudes. Our research indicated patterns of convergence especially in preferences for childcare, but that regime predominates in people’s justifications for their attitudes: regime differences in attitudes are resilient.

U2 - 10.1017/S004727941800079X

DO - 10.1017/S004727941800079X

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Journal of Social Policy

T2 - Journal of Social Policy

JF - Journal of Social Policy

SN - 0047-2794

ER -