Regional Development Dynamics in Indonesia before and after the ‘Big Bang’ Decentralization

Hal Hill, Yogi VIDYATTAMA

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Decentralization is in vogue. However, the relationship between decentralization and local-level development dynamics remains unclear. Does decentralization lead to a 'reform dividend' of more rapid development in better-governed regions, with attendant national benefits? What is the impact on spatial inequality? In particular, do poorer regions lag further behind as equalizing fiscal policies at the national level weaken? We address these issues with reference to Indonesia, the world's largest archipelagic nation, which implemented a 'big bang' decentralization program in 2001. Our main conclusion, perhaps counterintuitive, is that decentralization had a minimal impact on regional development dynamics, although its political impacts have been far-reaching.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1640027
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
JournalSingapore Economic Review
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Indonesia
Regional development
Decentralization
Fiscal policy
Lag
Dividends

Cite this

@article{6195fe1b64234228960ea626d3ba44bb,
title = "Regional Development Dynamics in Indonesia before and after the ‘Big Bang’ Decentralization",
abstract = "Decentralization is in vogue. However, the relationship between decentralization and local-level development dynamics remains unclear. Does decentralization lead to a 'reform dividend' of more rapid development in better-governed regions, with attendant national benefits? What is the impact on spatial inequality? In particular, do poorer regions lag further behind as equalizing fiscal policies at the national level weaken? We address these issues with reference to Indonesia, the world's largest archipelagic nation, which implemented a 'big bang' decentralization program in 2001. Our main conclusion, perhaps counterintuitive, is that decentralization had a minimal impact on regional development dynamics, although its political impacts have been far-reaching.",
keywords = "decentralization, Indonesia, regional development, spatial inequality",
author = "Hal Hill and Yogi VIDYATTAMA",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1142/S0217590816400270",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "Malayan Economic Review",
issn = "0047-5599",
publisher = "World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Regional Development Dynamics in Indonesia before and after the ‘Big Bang’ Decentralization. / Hill, Hal; VIDYATTAMA, Yogi.

In: Singapore Economic Review, Vol. 61, No. 2, 1640027, 2016, p. 1-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regional Development Dynamics in Indonesia before and after the ‘Big Bang’ Decentralization

AU - Hill, Hal

AU - VIDYATTAMA, Yogi

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Decentralization is in vogue. However, the relationship between decentralization and local-level development dynamics remains unclear. Does decentralization lead to a 'reform dividend' of more rapid development in better-governed regions, with attendant national benefits? What is the impact on spatial inequality? In particular, do poorer regions lag further behind as equalizing fiscal policies at the national level weaken? We address these issues with reference to Indonesia, the world's largest archipelagic nation, which implemented a 'big bang' decentralization program in 2001. Our main conclusion, perhaps counterintuitive, is that decentralization had a minimal impact on regional development dynamics, although its political impacts have been far-reaching.

AB - Decentralization is in vogue. However, the relationship between decentralization and local-level development dynamics remains unclear. Does decentralization lead to a 'reform dividend' of more rapid development in better-governed regions, with attendant national benefits? What is the impact on spatial inequality? In particular, do poorer regions lag further behind as equalizing fiscal policies at the national level weaken? We address these issues with reference to Indonesia, the world's largest archipelagic nation, which implemented a 'big bang' decentralization program in 2001. Our main conclusion, perhaps counterintuitive, is that decentralization had a minimal impact on regional development dynamics, although its political impacts have been far-reaching.

KW - decentralization

KW - Indonesia

KW - regional development

KW - spatial inequality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969916795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/regional-development-dynamics-indonesia-before-after-big-bang-decentralization

U2 - 10.1142/S0217590816400270

DO - 10.1142/S0217590816400270

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - Malayan Economic Review

JF - Malayan Economic Review

SN - 0047-5599

IS - 2

M1 - 1640027

ER -