Regulation and Reform: Promoting Residents' Rights in Australian Nursing Homes

Diane GIBSON, Gavin Turrell, Anne Jenkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The residents' rights movement has a relatively recent history in Australia, although it is well established in the United States. The recent Ronalds consultancy (1988-1989) established a national policy agenda for the residents' rights movement in Australia, including a Charter of Residents' Rights and Responsibilities, a Resident/Proprietor Agreement, independent advocacy services and complaints units with the Department of Health, Housing and Community Services. A less well publicised aspect of recent reforms to the aged care system also converges significantly on the issue of residents' rights. In 1987, a new and sophisticated system of nursing home regulation was introduced by the Australian government. The standards monitoring program, which is at the forefront of international developments in this field, is resident centred and outcome oriented. The data presented here suggest that the program has contributed toward the development of residents' rights in nursing homes, via improved commitment amongst management, and greater participation by residents. Yet overall progress in residents' rights remains precarious. Several conflicts of interest and sources of constraint are identified.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-91
Number of pages14
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

nursing home
resident
regulation
reform
rights and responsibilities
conflict of interest
community service
charter
complaint
housing
commitment
monitoring
participation
history
health
management

Cite this

@article{19b466120a3d4be996d150d0e2a661f3,
title = "Regulation and Reform: Promoting Residents' Rights in Australian Nursing Homes",
abstract = "The residents' rights movement has a relatively recent history in Australia, although it is well established in the United States. The recent Ronalds consultancy (1988-1989) established a national policy agenda for the residents' rights movement in Australia, including a Charter of Residents' Rights and Responsibilities, a Resident/Proprietor Agreement, independent advocacy services and complaints units with the Department of Health, Housing and Community Services. A less well publicised aspect of recent reforms to the aged care system also converges significantly on the issue of residents' rights. In 1987, a new and sophisticated system of nursing home regulation was introduced by the Australian government. The standards monitoring program, which is at the forefront of international developments in this field, is resident centred and outcome oriented. The data presented here suggest that the program has contributed toward the development of residents' rights in nursing homes, via improved commitment amongst management, and greater participation by residents. Yet overall progress in residents' rights remains precarious. Several conflicts of interest and sources of constraint are identified.",
author = "Diane GIBSON and Gavin Turrell and Anne Jenkins",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1177/144078339302900105",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "73--91",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology",
issn = "1440-7833",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Regulation and Reform: Promoting Residents' Rights in Australian Nursing Homes. / GIBSON, Diane; Turrell, Gavin; Jenkins, Anne .

In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1993, p. 73-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulation and Reform: Promoting Residents' Rights in Australian Nursing Homes

AU - GIBSON, Diane

AU - Turrell, Gavin

AU - Jenkins, Anne

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - The residents' rights movement has a relatively recent history in Australia, although it is well established in the United States. The recent Ronalds consultancy (1988-1989) established a national policy agenda for the residents' rights movement in Australia, including a Charter of Residents' Rights and Responsibilities, a Resident/Proprietor Agreement, independent advocacy services and complaints units with the Department of Health, Housing and Community Services. A less well publicised aspect of recent reforms to the aged care system also converges significantly on the issue of residents' rights. In 1987, a new and sophisticated system of nursing home regulation was introduced by the Australian government. The standards monitoring program, which is at the forefront of international developments in this field, is resident centred and outcome oriented. The data presented here suggest that the program has contributed toward the development of residents' rights in nursing homes, via improved commitment amongst management, and greater participation by residents. Yet overall progress in residents' rights remains precarious. Several conflicts of interest and sources of constraint are identified.

AB - The residents' rights movement has a relatively recent history in Australia, although it is well established in the United States. The recent Ronalds consultancy (1988-1989) established a national policy agenda for the residents' rights movement in Australia, including a Charter of Residents' Rights and Responsibilities, a Resident/Proprietor Agreement, independent advocacy services and complaints units with the Department of Health, Housing and Community Services. A less well publicised aspect of recent reforms to the aged care system also converges significantly on the issue of residents' rights. In 1987, a new and sophisticated system of nursing home regulation was introduced by the Australian government. The standards monitoring program, which is at the forefront of international developments in this field, is resident centred and outcome oriented. The data presented here suggest that the program has contributed toward the development of residents' rights in nursing homes, via improved commitment amongst management, and greater participation by residents. Yet overall progress in residents' rights remains precarious. Several conflicts of interest and sources of constraint are identified.

U2 - 10.1177/144078339302900105

DO - 10.1177/144078339302900105

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 73

EP - 91

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology

SN - 1440-7833

IS - 1

ER -