Regulation and the role of trust

Reflections from the mining industry

Neil Gunningham, Darren Sinclair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The role of prosecution in achieving compliance with social regulation is a highly contentious issue, nowhere more so than with regard to work-related injury and death in the New South Wales mining industry. Following a mining disaster, political pressure prompted the mines inspectorate to abandon its traditional 'advise and persuade' approach in favour of a much tougher, deterrence-oriented approach. Our field-work suggests that while the former approach can result in regulatory capture, the latter can be equally counterproductive. In the mining industry, interactions between inspectors and the regulated industry are frequent and ongoing and trust is central to constructive relations. When those relations break down (as under an inappropriate prosecution policy) then dialogue ceases, information is withheld rather than shared, in-firm accident investigation, prevention, and remedial action are inhibited and both sides retreat to a form of adversarialism that undermines regulatory effectiveness. Through a 20-year case study of the mines inspectorate, the article demonstrates the centrality of trust to regulatory effectiveness, how it can be lost, and how it can best be regained.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-194
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Law and Society
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

prosecution
regulation
industry
deterrence
disaster
accident
dialogue
firm
death
interaction

Cite this

@article{bee2e34f6062467b9343627ddfc99c00,
title = "Regulation and the role of trust: Reflections from the mining industry",
abstract = "The role of prosecution in achieving compliance with social regulation is a highly contentious issue, nowhere more so than with regard to work-related injury and death in the New South Wales mining industry. Following a mining disaster, political pressure prompted the mines inspectorate to abandon its traditional 'advise and persuade' approach in favour of a much tougher, deterrence-oriented approach. Our field-work suggests that while the former approach can result in regulatory capture, the latter can be equally counterproductive. In the mining industry, interactions between inspectors and the regulated industry are frequent and ongoing and trust is central to constructive relations. When those relations break down (as under an inappropriate prosecution policy) then dialogue ceases, information is withheld rather than shared, in-firm accident investigation, prevention, and remedial action are inhibited and both sides retreat to a form of adversarialism that undermines regulatory effectiveness. Through a 20-year case study of the mines inspectorate, the article demonstrates the centrality of trust to regulatory effectiveness, how it can be lost, and how it can best be regained.",
author = "Neil Gunningham and Darren Sinclair",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00462.x",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "167--194",
journal = "British Journal of Law and Society",
issn = "0263-323X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Regulation and the role of trust : Reflections from the mining industry. / Gunningham, Neil; Sinclair, Darren.

In: Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2009, p. 167-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulation and the role of trust

T2 - Reflections from the mining industry

AU - Gunningham, Neil

AU - Sinclair, Darren

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The role of prosecution in achieving compliance with social regulation is a highly contentious issue, nowhere more so than with regard to work-related injury and death in the New South Wales mining industry. Following a mining disaster, political pressure prompted the mines inspectorate to abandon its traditional 'advise and persuade' approach in favour of a much tougher, deterrence-oriented approach. Our field-work suggests that while the former approach can result in regulatory capture, the latter can be equally counterproductive. In the mining industry, interactions between inspectors and the regulated industry are frequent and ongoing and trust is central to constructive relations. When those relations break down (as under an inappropriate prosecution policy) then dialogue ceases, information is withheld rather than shared, in-firm accident investigation, prevention, and remedial action are inhibited and both sides retreat to a form of adversarialism that undermines regulatory effectiveness. Through a 20-year case study of the mines inspectorate, the article demonstrates the centrality of trust to regulatory effectiveness, how it can be lost, and how it can best be regained.

AB - The role of prosecution in achieving compliance with social regulation is a highly contentious issue, nowhere more so than with regard to work-related injury and death in the New South Wales mining industry. Following a mining disaster, political pressure prompted the mines inspectorate to abandon its traditional 'advise and persuade' approach in favour of a much tougher, deterrence-oriented approach. Our field-work suggests that while the former approach can result in regulatory capture, the latter can be equally counterproductive. In the mining industry, interactions between inspectors and the regulated industry are frequent and ongoing and trust is central to constructive relations. When those relations break down (as under an inappropriate prosecution policy) then dialogue ceases, information is withheld rather than shared, in-firm accident investigation, prevention, and remedial action are inhibited and both sides retreat to a form of adversarialism that undermines regulatory effectiveness. Through a 20-year case study of the mines inspectorate, the article demonstrates the centrality of trust to regulatory effectiveness, how it can be lost, and how it can best be regained.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649613591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00462.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00462.x

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 167

EP - 194

JO - British Journal of Law and Society

JF - British Journal of Law and Society

SN - 0263-323X

IS - 2

ER -