Relationships Between Propulsion and Anthropometry in Paralympic Swimmers

Andrew Dingley, David Pyne, Brendan Burkett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: To characterize relationships between propulsion, anthropometry, and performance in Paralympic swimming. Methods: A cross-sectional study of swimmers (13 male, 15 female) age 20.5 ± 4.4 y was conducted. Subject locomotor categorizations were no physical disability (n = 8, classes S13–S14) and low-severity (n = 11, classes S9–S10) or midseverity disability (n = 9, classes S6–S8). Full anthropometric profiles estimated muscle mass and body fat, a bilateral swim-bench ergometer quantified upper-body power production, and 100-m time trials quantified swimming performance. Results: Correlations between ergometer mean power and swimming performance increased with degree of physical disability (low-severity male r = .65, ±0.56, and female r = .68, ±0.64; midseverity, r = .87, ±0.41, and r = .79, ±0.75). The female midseverity group showed nearperfect (positive) relationships for taller swimmers’ (with a greater muscle mass and longer arm span) swimming faster, while for female no- and low-severity-disability groups, greater muscle mass was associated with slower velocity (r = .78, ±0.43, and r = .65, ±0.66). This was supported with lighter females (with less frontal surface area) in the low-severity group being faster (r = .94, ±0.24). In a gender contrast, low-severity males with less muscle mass (r = –.64, ±0.56), high skinfolds (r = .78, ±0.43), a longer arm span (r = .58, ±0.60) or smaller frontal surface area (r = –.93, ±0.19) were detrimental to swimming-velocity production. Conclusion: Low-severity male and midseverity female Paralympic swimmers should be encouraged to develop muscle mass and upper-body power to enhance swimming performance. The generalized anthropometric measures appear to be a secondary consideration for coaches
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)978-985
    Number of pages8
    JournalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
    Volume10
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Anthropometry
    Muscles
    Adipose Tissue
    Cross-Sectional Studies

    Cite this

    @article{1c54ed3bb06d420cb9751a5864d69249,
    title = "Relationships Between Propulsion and Anthropometry in Paralympic Swimmers",
    abstract = "Purpose: To characterize relationships between propulsion, anthropometry, and performance in Paralympic swimming. Methods: A cross-sectional study of swimmers (13 male, 15 female) age 20.5 ± 4.4 y was conducted. Subject locomotor categorizations were no physical disability (n = 8, classes S13–S14) and low-severity (n = 11, classes S9–S10) or midseverity disability (n = 9, classes S6–S8). Full anthropometric profiles estimated muscle mass and body fat, a bilateral swim-bench ergometer quantified upper-body power production, and 100-m time trials quantified swimming performance. Results: Correlations between ergometer mean power and swimming performance increased with degree of physical disability (low-severity male r = .65, ±0.56, and female r = .68, ±0.64; midseverity, r = .87, ±0.41, and r = .79, ±0.75). The female midseverity group showed nearperfect (positive) relationships for taller swimmers’ (with a greater muscle mass and longer arm span) swimming faster, while for female no- and low-severity-disability groups, greater muscle mass was associated with slower velocity (r = .78, ±0.43, and r = .65, ±0.66). This was supported with lighter females (with less frontal surface area) in the low-severity group being faster (r = .94, ±0.24). In a gender contrast, low-severity males with less muscle mass (r = –.64, ±0.56), high skinfolds (r = .78, ±0.43), a longer arm span (r = .58, ±0.60) or smaller frontal surface area (r = –.93, ±0.19) were detrimental to swimming-velocity production. Conclusion: Low-severity male and midseverity female Paralympic swimmers should be encouraged to develop muscle mass and upper-body power to enhance swimming performance. The generalized anthropometric measures appear to be a secondary consideration for coaches",
    keywords = "Hand power, Swim-bench ergometer, Swimming",
    author = "Andrew Dingley and David Pyne and Brendan Burkett",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1123/ijspp.2014-0186",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "978--985",
    journal = "International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance",
    issn = "1555-0265",
    publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
    number = "8",

    }

    Relationships Between Propulsion and Anthropometry in Paralympic Swimmers. / Dingley, Andrew; Pyne, David; Burkett, Brendan.

    In: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Vol. 10, No. 8, 2015, p. 978-985.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Relationships Between Propulsion and Anthropometry in Paralympic Swimmers

    AU - Dingley, Andrew

    AU - Pyne, David

    AU - Burkett, Brendan

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Purpose: To characterize relationships between propulsion, anthropometry, and performance in Paralympic swimming. Methods: A cross-sectional study of swimmers (13 male, 15 female) age 20.5 ± 4.4 y was conducted. Subject locomotor categorizations were no physical disability (n = 8, classes S13–S14) and low-severity (n = 11, classes S9–S10) or midseverity disability (n = 9, classes S6–S8). Full anthropometric profiles estimated muscle mass and body fat, a bilateral swim-bench ergometer quantified upper-body power production, and 100-m time trials quantified swimming performance. Results: Correlations between ergometer mean power and swimming performance increased with degree of physical disability (low-severity male r = .65, ±0.56, and female r = .68, ±0.64; midseverity, r = .87, ±0.41, and r = .79, ±0.75). The female midseverity group showed nearperfect (positive) relationships for taller swimmers’ (with a greater muscle mass and longer arm span) swimming faster, while for female no- and low-severity-disability groups, greater muscle mass was associated with slower velocity (r = .78, ±0.43, and r = .65, ±0.66). This was supported with lighter females (with less frontal surface area) in the low-severity group being faster (r = .94, ±0.24). In a gender contrast, low-severity males with less muscle mass (r = –.64, ±0.56), high skinfolds (r = .78, ±0.43), a longer arm span (r = .58, ±0.60) or smaller frontal surface area (r = –.93, ±0.19) were detrimental to swimming-velocity production. Conclusion: Low-severity male and midseverity female Paralympic swimmers should be encouraged to develop muscle mass and upper-body power to enhance swimming performance. The generalized anthropometric measures appear to be a secondary consideration for coaches

    AB - Purpose: To characterize relationships between propulsion, anthropometry, and performance in Paralympic swimming. Methods: A cross-sectional study of swimmers (13 male, 15 female) age 20.5 ± 4.4 y was conducted. Subject locomotor categorizations were no physical disability (n = 8, classes S13–S14) and low-severity (n = 11, classes S9–S10) or midseverity disability (n = 9, classes S6–S8). Full anthropometric profiles estimated muscle mass and body fat, a bilateral swim-bench ergometer quantified upper-body power production, and 100-m time trials quantified swimming performance. Results: Correlations between ergometer mean power and swimming performance increased with degree of physical disability (low-severity male r = .65, ±0.56, and female r = .68, ±0.64; midseverity, r = .87, ±0.41, and r = .79, ±0.75). The female midseverity group showed nearperfect (positive) relationships for taller swimmers’ (with a greater muscle mass and longer arm span) swimming faster, while for female no- and low-severity-disability groups, greater muscle mass was associated with slower velocity (r = .78, ±0.43, and r = .65, ±0.66). This was supported with lighter females (with less frontal surface area) in the low-severity group being faster (r = .94, ±0.24). In a gender contrast, low-severity males with less muscle mass (r = –.64, ±0.56), high skinfolds (r = .78, ±0.43), a longer arm span (r = .58, ±0.60) or smaller frontal surface area (r = –.93, ±0.19) were detrimental to swimming-velocity production. Conclusion: Low-severity male and midseverity female Paralympic swimmers should be encouraged to develop muscle mass and upper-body power to enhance swimming performance. The generalized anthropometric measures appear to be a secondary consideration for coaches

    KW - Hand power

    KW - Swim-bench ergometer

    KW - Swimming

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946826875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/relationships-between-propulsion-anthropometry-paralympic-swimmers

    U2 - 10.1123/ijspp.2014-0186

    DO - 10.1123/ijspp.2014-0186

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 978

    EP - 985

    JO - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

    JF - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

    SN - 1555-0265

    IS - 8

    ER -