Relative deprivation and attribution:

From grievance to action

Iain WALKER, Ngai Kin Wong, Kerry Kretzschmar

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

Abstract

Relative deprivation theory belongs to a family of social evaluation theories (Pettigrew, 1967) that have as their common bond a focus on the social comparative nature of social judgments. The core of the relative deprivation (RD) construct is that when people's expectations about the goods and conditions of life to which they believe they are entitled are thwarted, they become angry and are motivated to redress the perceived inequity. Judgments about entitlements can only be made relatively – people compare their current or anticipated outcomes with those of other individuals or groups. Unfortunately, as with most members of the family of social evaluation theories, when RD theory has been applied to major social issues, it has typically been in a post hoc manner. As a theory, it will only mature if it lends itself to prediction, rather than retrospection. This point has been made for several decades now. One reason why RD theory has been applied retrospectively more than prospectively is the relative absence of testable models linking the perception of deprivation, through various mediators, to behavioral outcomes. In this chapter we attempt to specify such a model. The model we suggest integrates Folger's Referent Cognition Theory (RCT) of RD (Folger, 1984, 1986, 1987; Mark & Folger, 1984) and Weiner's version of attribution theory (1985, 1986, 1995). We begin by describing RCT, and claim that it is a general, useful, and parsimonious model of RD.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRelative deprivation theory:
Subtitle of host publicationSpecification, development, and integration
EditorsIain Walker, Heather Smith
PublisherCambridge Univeristy Press
Chapter13
Pages288-312
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9780511527753
ISBN (Print)9780521180696
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

deprivation
attribution
cognition
social judgement
attribution theory
social issue
evaluation

Cite this

WALKER, I., Wong, N. K., & Kretzschmar, K. (2002). Relative deprivation and attribution: From grievance to action. In I. Walker, & H. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation theory: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 288-312). Cambridge Univeristy Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527753.013
WALKER, Iain ; Wong, Ngai Kin ; Kretzschmar, Kerry. / Relative deprivation and attribution: From grievance to action. Relative deprivation theory: Specification, development, and integration. editor / Iain Walker ; Heather Smith. Cambridge Univeristy Press, 2002. pp. 288-312
@inbook{6b33f3c4755f43dc9b05b55567df3471,
title = "Relative deprivation and attribution:: From grievance to action",
abstract = "Relative deprivation theory belongs to a family of social evaluation theories (Pettigrew, 1967) that have as their common bond a focus on the social comparative nature of social judgments. The core of the relative deprivation (RD) construct is that when people's expectations about the goods and conditions of life to which they believe they are entitled are thwarted, they become angry and are motivated to redress the perceived inequity. Judgments about entitlements can only be made relatively – people compare their current or anticipated outcomes with those of other individuals or groups. Unfortunately, as with most members of the family of social evaluation theories, when RD theory has been applied to major social issues, it has typically been in a post hoc manner. As a theory, it will only mature if it lends itself to prediction, rather than retrospection. This point has been made for several decades now. One reason why RD theory has been applied retrospectively more than prospectively is the relative absence of testable models linking the perception of deprivation, through various mediators, to behavioral outcomes. In this chapter we attempt to specify such a model. The model we suggest integrates Folger's Referent Cognition Theory (RCT) of RD (Folger, 1984, 1986, 1987; Mark & Folger, 1984) and Weiner's version of attribution theory (1985, 1986, 1995). We begin by describing RCT, and claim that it is a general, useful, and parsimonious model of RD.",
author = "Iain WALKER and Wong, {Ngai Kin} and Kerry Kretzschmar",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511527753.013",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780521180696",
pages = "288--312",
editor = "Walker, {Iain } and Heather Smith",
booktitle = "Relative deprivation theory:",
publisher = "Cambridge Univeristy Press",

}

WALKER, I, Wong, NK & Kretzschmar, K 2002, Relative deprivation and attribution: From grievance to action. in I Walker & H Smith (eds), Relative deprivation theory: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge Univeristy Press, pp. 288-312. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527753.013

Relative deprivation and attribution: From grievance to action. / WALKER, Iain; Wong, Ngai Kin; Kretzschmar, Kerry.

Relative deprivation theory: Specification, development, and integration. ed. / Iain Walker; Heather Smith. Cambridge Univeristy Press, 2002. p. 288-312.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Relative deprivation and attribution:

T2 - From grievance to action

AU - WALKER, Iain

AU - Wong, Ngai Kin

AU - Kretzschmar, Kerry

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Relative deprivation theory belongs to a family of social evaluation theories (Pettigrew, 1967) that have as their common bond a focus on the social comparative nature of social judgments. The core of the relative deprivation (RD) construct is that when people's expectations about the goods and conditions of life to which they believe they are entitled are thwarted, they become angry and are motivated to redress the perceived inequity. Judgments about entitlements can only be made relatively – people compare their current or anticipated outcomes with those of other individuals or groups. Unfortunately, as with most members of the family of social evaluation theories, when RD theory has been applied to major social issues, it has typically been in a post hoc manner. As a theory, it will only mature if it lends itself to prediction, rather than retrospection. This point has been made for several decades now. One reason why RD theory has been applied retrospectively more than prospectively is the relative absence of testable models linking the perception of deprivation, through various mediators, to behavioral outcomes. In this chapter we attempt to specify such a model. The model we suggest integrates Folger's Referent Cognition Theory (RCT) of RD (Folger, 1984, 1986, 1987; Mark & Folger, 1984) and Weiner's version of attribution theory (1985, 1986, 1995). We begin by describing RCT, and claim that it is a general, useful, and parsimonious model of RD.

AB - Relative deprivation theory belongs to a family of social evaluation theories (Pettigrew, 1967) that have as their common bond a focus on the social comparative nature of social judgments. The core of the relative deprivation (RD) construct is that when people's expectations about the goods and conditions of life to which they believe they are entitled are thwarted, they become angry and are motivated to redress the perceived inequity. Judgments about entitlements can only be made relatively – people compare their current or anticipated outcomes with those of other individuals or groups. Unfortunately, as with most members of the family of social evaluation theories, when RD theory has been applied to major social issues, it has typically been in a post hoc manner. As a theory, it will only mature if it lends itself to prediction, rather than retrospection. This point has been made for several decades now. One reason why RD theory has been applied retrospectively more than prospectively is the relative absence of testable models linking the perception of deprivation, through various mediators, to behavioral outcomes. In this chapter we attempt to specify such a model. The model we suggest integrates Folger's Referent Cognition Theory (RCT) of RD (Folger, 1984, 1986, 1987; Mark & Folger, 1984) and Weiner's version of attribution theory (1985, 1986, 1995). We begin by describing RCT, and claim that it is a general, useful, and parsimonious model of RD.

UR - https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/relative-deprivation/relative-deprivation-and-attribution-from-grievance-to-action/BFA2FF3F1C634FECD706668AA3B320E2

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511527753.013

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511527753.013

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780521180696

SP - 288

EP - 312

BT - Relative deprivation theory:

A2 - Walker, Iain

A2 - Smith, Heather

PB - Cambridge Univeristy Press

ER -

WALKER I, Wong NK, Kretzschmar K. Relative deprivation and attribution: From grievance to action. In Walker I, Smith H, editors, Relative deprivation theory: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge Univeristy Press. 2002. p. 288-312 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527753.013