Relative Technical Efficiency Assessment of Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review

Carlos R. García-Alonso; Nerea Almeda; José Alberto Salinas-Pérez; Mencía R. Gutiérrez-Colosía; Luis Salvador-Carulla

doi:10.1007/s10488-019-00921-6

Relative Technical Efficiency Assessment of Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review

Carlos R. García-Alonso
, Nerea Almeda
, José Alberto Salinas-Pérez
, Mencía R. Gutiérrez-Colosía
, Luis Salvador-Carulla

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current prevalence of mental disorders demands improved ways of the management and planning of mental health (MH) services. Relative technical efficiency (RTE) is an appropriate and robust indicator to support decision-making in health care, but it has not been applied significantly in MH. This article systematically reviews the empirical background of RTE in MH services following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Finally, 13 studies were included, and the findings provide new standard classifications of RTE variables, efficiency determinants and strategies to improve MH management and planning.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	429-444
Number of pages	16
Journal	Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Volume	46
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-019-00921-6
Publication status	Published - 15 Jul 2019
Externally published	Yes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

10.1007/s10488-019-00921-6

https://rdcu.be/eyAwxLicence: Other

Cite this

@article{8c2cd203b7194cf6a59cdabb0663e235,

title = "Relative Technical Efficiency Assessment of Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review",

abstract = "The current prevalence of mental disorders demands improved ways of the management and planning of mental health (MH) services. Relative technical efficiency (RTE) is an appropriate and robust indicator to support decision-making in health care, but it has not been applied significantly in MH. This article systematically reviews the empirical background of RTE in MH services following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Finally, 13 studies were included, and the findings provide new standard classifications of RTE variables, efficiency determinants and strategies to improve MH management and planning.",

keywords = "DEA, Mental health care, Mental health service, Relative technical efficiency, Systematic review",

author = "Garc{\'i}a-Alonso, \{Carlos R.\} and Nerea Almeda and Salinas-P{\'e}rez, \{Jos{\'e} Alberto\} and Guti{\'e}rrez-Colos{\'i}a, \{Menc{\'i}a R.\} and Luis Salvador-Carulla",

note = "Funding Information: Funding This study was funded by the Carlos III Health Institute (Ministry of Health of Spain) (Project PI15/01986) and co-funded by FEDER funds. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.",

year = "2019",

month = jul,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1007/s10488-019-00921-6",

language = "English",

volume = "46",

pages = "429--444",

journal = "Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research",

issn = "1522-3434",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relative Technical Efficiency Assessment of Mental Health Services

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - García-Alonso, Carlos R.

AU - Almeda, Nerea

AU - Salinas-Pérez, José Alberto

AU - Gutiérrez-Colosía, Mencía R.

AU - Salvador-Carulla, Luis

N1 - Funding Information: Funding This study was funded by the Carlos III Health Institute (Ministry of Health of Spain) (Project PI15/01986) and co-funded by FEDER funds. Publisher Copyright: © 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

PY - 2019/7/15

Y1 - 2019/7/15

N2 - The current prevalence of mental disorders demands improved ways of the management and planning of mental health (MH) services. Relative technical efficiency (RTE) is an appropriate and robust indicator to support decision-making in health care, but it has not been applied significantly in MH. This article systematically reviews the empirical background of RTE in MH services following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Finally, 13 studies were included, and the findings provide new standard classifications of RTE variables, efficiency determinants and strategies to improve MH management and planning.

AB - The current prevalence of mental disorders demands improved ways of the management and planning of mental health (MH) services. Relative technical efficiency (RTE) is an appropriate and robust indicator to support decision-making in health care, but it has not been applied significantly in MH. This article systematically reviews the empirical background of RTE in MH services following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Finally, 13 studies were included, and the findings provide new standard classifications of RTE variables, efficiency determinants and strategies to improve MH management and planning.

KW - DEA

KW - Mental health care

KW - Mental health service

KW - Relative technical efficiency

KW - Systematic review

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85059839628

U2 - 10.1007/s10488-019-00921-6

DO - 10.1007/s10488-019-00921-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 30627978

AN - SCOPUS:85059839628

SN - 1522-3434

VL - 46

SP - 429

EP - 444

JO - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

JF - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

IS - 4

ER -

Relative Technical Efficiency Assessment of Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this