Reliability and effect of sodium bicarbonate

Buffering and 2000-m rowing performance

Amelia J. Carr, Gary J. Slater, Christopher J. Gore, Brian Dawson, Louise M. Burke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the effect and reliability of acute and chronic sodium bicarbonate ingestion for 2000-m rowing ergometer performance (watts) and blood bicarbonate concentration [HCO3-]. Methods: In a crossover study, 7 well-trained rowers performed paired 2000-m rowing ergometer trials under 3 double-blinded conditions: (1) 0.3 grams per kilogram of body mass (g/kg BM) acute bicarbonate; (2) 0.5 g/kg BM daily chronic bicarbonate for 3 d; and (3) calcium carbonate placebo, in semi-counterbalanced order. For 2000-m performance and [HCO3-], we examined differences in effects between conditions via pairwise comparisons, with differences interpreted in relation to the likelihood of exceeding smallest worthwhile change thresholds for each variable. We also calculated the within-subject variation (percent typical error). Results: There were only trivial differences in 2000-m performance between placebo (277 ± 60 W), acute bicarbonate (280 ± 65 W) and chronic bicarbonate (282 ± 65 W); however, [HCO3-] was substantially greater after acute bicarbonate, than with chronic loading and placebo. Typical error for 2000-m mean power was 2.1% (90% confidence interval 1.4 to 4.0%) for acute bicarbonate, 3.6% (2.5 to 7.0%) for chronic bicarbonate, and 1.6% (1.1 to 3.0%) for placebo. Postsupplementation [HCO3-] typical error was 7.3% (5.0 to 14.5%) for acute bicarbonate, 2.9% (2.0 to 5.7%) for chronic bicarbonate and 6.0% (1.4 to 11.9%) for placebo. Conclusion: Performance in 2000-m rowing ergometer trials may not substantially improve after acute or chronic bicarbonate loading. However, performances will be reliable with both acute and chronic bicarbonate loading protocols.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)152-160
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sodium Bicarbonate
Bicarbonates
Placebos
Calcium Carbonate
Cross-Over Studies
Eating

Cite this

Carr, Amelia J. ; Slater, Gary J. ; Gore, Christopher J. ; Dawson, Brian ; Burke, Louise M. / Reliability and effect of sodium bicarbonate : Buffering and 2000-m rowing performance. In: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 152-160.
@article{6bbd03f350e0488392ca1e494fd83758,
title = "Reliability and effect of sodium bicarbonate: Buffering and 2000-m rowing performance",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the effect and reliability of acute and chronic sodium bicarbonate ingestion for 2000-m rowing ergometer performance (watts) and blood bicarbonate concentration [HCO3-]. Methods: In a crossover study, 7 well-trained rowers performed paired 2000-m rowing ergometer trials under 3 double-blinded conditions: (1) 0.3 grams per kilogram of body mass (g/kg BM) acute bicarbonate; (2) 0.5 g/kg BM daily chronic bicarbonate for 3 d; and (3) calcium carbonate placebo, in semi-counterbalanced order. For 2000-m performance and [HCO3-], we examined differences in effects between conditions via pairwise comparisons, with differences interpreted in relation to the likelihood of exceeding smallest worthwhile change thresholds for each variable. We also calculated the within-subject variation (percent typical error). Results: There were only trivial differences in 2000-m performance between placebo (277 ± 60 W), acute bicarbonate (280 ± 65 W) and chronic bicarbonate (282 ± 65 W); however, [HCO3-] was substantially greater after acute bicarbonate, than with chronic loading and placebo. Typical error for 2000-m mean power was 2.1{\%} (90{\%} confidence interval 1.4 to 4.0{\%}) for acute bicarbonate, 3.6{\%} (2.5 to 7.0{\%}) for chronic bicarbonate, and 1.6{\%} (1.1 to 3.0{\%}) for placebo. Postsupplementation [HCO3-] typical error was 7.3{\%} (5.0 to 14.5{\%}) for acute bicarbonate, 2.9{\%} (2.0 to 5.7{\%}) for chronic bicarbonate and 6.0{\%} (1.4 to 11.9{\%}) for placebo. Conclusion: Performance in 2000-m rowing ergometer trials may not substantially improve after acute or chronic bicarbonate loading. However, performances will be reliable with both acute and chronic bicarbonate loading protocols.",
keywords = "Ergometer performance, Individual differences, Induced alkalosis, Rowing regatta, Typical error",
author = "Carr, {Amelia J.} and Slater, {Gary J.} and Gore, {Christopher J.} and Brian Dawson and Burke, {Louise M.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1123/ijspp.7.2.152",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "152--160",
journal = "International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance",
issn = "1555-0265",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Reliability and effect of sodium bicarbonate : Buffering and 2000-m rowing performance. / Carr, Amelia J.; Slater, Gary J.; Gore, Christopher J.; Dawson, Brian; Burke, Louise M.

In: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2012, p. 152-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and effect of sodium bicarbonate

T2 - Buffering and 2000-m rowing performance

AU - Carr, Amelia J.

AU - Slater, Gary J.

AU - Gore, Christopher J.

AU - Dawson, Brian

AU - Burke, Louise M.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the effect and reliability of acute and chronic sodium bicarbonate ingestion for 2000-m rowing ergometer performance (watts) and blood bicarbonate concentration [HCO3-]. Methods: In a crossover study, 7 well-trained rowers performed paired 2000-m rowing ergometer trials under 3 double-blinded conditions: (1) 0.3 grams per kilogram of body mass (g/kg BM) acute bicarbonate; (2) 0.5 g/kg BM daily chronic bicarbonate for 3 d; and (3) calcium carbonate placebo, in semi-counterbalanced order. For 2000-m performance and [HCO3-], we examined differences in effects between conditions via pairwise comparisons, with differences interpreted in relation to the likelihood of exceeding smallest worthwhile change thresholds for each variable. We also calculated the within-subject variation (percent typical error). Results: There were only trivial differences in 2000-m performance between placebo (277 ± 60 W), acute bicarbonate (280 ± 65 W) and chronic bicarbonate (282 ± 65 W); however, [HCO3-] was substantially greater after acute bicarbonate, than with chronic loading and placebo. Typical error for 2000-m mean power was 2.1% (90% confidence interval 1.4 to 4.0%) for acute bicarbonate, 3.6% (2.5 to 7.0%) for chronic bicarbonate, and 1.6% (1.1 to 3.0%) for placebo. Postsupplementation [HCO3-] typical error was 7.3% (5.0 to 14.5%) for acute bicarbonate, 2.9% (2.0 to 5.7%) for chronic bicarbonate and 6.0% (1.4 to 11.9%) for placebo. Conclusion: Performance in 2000-m rowing ergometer trials may not substantially improve after acute or chronic bicarbonate loading. However, performances will be reliable with both acute and chronic bicarbonate loading protocols.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the effect and reliability of acute and chronic sodium bicarbonate ingestion for 2000-m rowing ergometer performance (watts) and blood bicarbonate concentration [HCO3-]. Methods: In a crossover study, 7 well-trained rowers performed paired 2000-m rowing ergometer trials under 3 double-blinded conditions: (1) 0.3 grams per kilogram of body mass (g/kg BM) acute bicarbonate; (2) 0.5 g/kg BM daily chronic bicarbonate for 3 d; and (3) calcium carbonate placebo, in semi-counterbalanced order. For 2000-m performance and [HCO3-], we examined differences in effects between conditions via pairwise comparisons, with differences interpreted in relation to the likelihood of exceeding smallest worthwhile change thresholds for each variable. We also calculated the within-subject variation (percent typical error). Results: There were only trivial differences in 2000-m performance between placebo (277 ± 60 W), acute bicarbonate (280 ± 65 W) and chronic bicarbonate (282 ± 65 W); however, [HCO3-] was substantially greater after acute bicarbonate, than with chronic loading and placebo. Typical error for 2000-m mean power was 2.1% (90% confidence interval 1.4 to 4.0%) for acute bicarbonate, 3.6% (2.5 to 7.0%) for chronic bicarbonate, and 1.6% (1.1 to 3.0%) for placebo. Postsupplementation [HCO3-] typical error was 7.3% (5.0 to 14.5%) for acute bicarbonate, 2.9% (2.0 to 5.7%) for chronic bicarbonate and 6.0% (1.4 to 11.9%) for placebo. Conclusion: Performance in 2000-m rowing ergometer trials may not substantially improve after acute or chronic bicarbonate loading. However, performances will be reliable with both acute and chronic bicarbonate loading protocols.

KW - Ergometer performance

KW - Individual differences

KW - Induced alkalosis

KW - Rowing regatta

KW - Typical error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861628338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/ijspp.7.2.152

DO - 10.1123/ijspp.7.2.152

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 152

EP - 160

JO - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

JF - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

SN - 1555-0265

IS - 2

ER -