Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries

Jeroen J.A. van Boxtel, Tomas Knapen, Casper J. Erkelens, Raymond van Ee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When the two eyes are presented with conflicting stimuli, perception starts to fluctuate over time (i.e., binocular rivalry). A similar fluctuation occurs when two patterns are presented to a single eye (i.e., monocular rivalry), or when they are swapped rapidly and repeatedly between the eyes (i.e., stimulus rivalry). Although all these cases lead to rivalry, in quantitative terms these modes of rivalry are generally found to differ significantly. We studied these different modes of rivalry with identical intermittently shown stimuli while varying the temporal layout of stimulation. We show that the quantitative differences between the modes of rivalry are caused by the presence of monocular interactions between the rivaling patterns; the introduction of a blank period just before a stimulus swap changed the number of rivalry reports to the extent that monocular and stimulus rivalries were inducible over ranges of spatial frequency content and contrast values that were nearly identical to binocular rivalry. Moreover when monocular interactions did not occur the perceptual dynamics of monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries were statistically indistinguishable. This range of identical behavior exhibited a monocular (∼50 ms) and a binocular (∼350 ms) limit. We argue that a common binocular, or pattern-based, mechanism determines the temporal constraints for these modes of rivalry.

Original languageEnglish
Article number13
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume8
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Nov 2008
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{9d13f5acd0fc47f7b647697022cb3369,
title = "Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries",
abstract = "When the two eyes are presented with conflicting stimuli, perception starts to fluctuate over time (i.e., binocular rivalry). A similar fluctuation occurs when two patterns are presented to a single eye (i.e., monocular rivalry), or when they are swapped rapidly and repeatedly between the eyes (i.e., stimulus rivalry). Although all these cases lead to rivalry, in quantitative terms these modes of rivalry are generally found to differ significantly. We studied these different modes of rivalry with identical intermittently shown stimuli while varying the temporal layout of stimulation. We show that the quantitative differences between the modes of rivalry are caused by the presence of monocular interactions between the rivaling patterns; the introduction of a blank period just before a stimulus swap changed the number of rivalry reports to the extent that monocular and stimulus rivalries were inducible over ranges of spatial frequency content and contrast values that were nearly identical to binocular rivalry. Moreover when monocular interactions did not occur the perceptual dynamics of monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries were statistically indistinguishable. This range of identical behavior exhibited a monocular (∼50 ms) and a binocular (∼350 ms) limit. We argue that a common binocular, or pattern-based, mechanism determines the temporal constraints for these modes of rivalry.",
keywords = "Binocular vision, Bistability, Perceptual organization, Rivalry",
author = "{van Boxtel}, {Jeroen J.A.} and Tomas Knapen and Erkelens, {Casper J.} and {van Ee}, Raymond",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1167/8.15.13",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "15",

}

Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries. / van Boxtel, Jeroen J.A.; Knapen, Tomas; Erkelens, Casper J.; van Ee, Raymond.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 8, No. 15, 13, 24.11.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries

AU - van Boxtel, Jeroen J.A.

AU - Knapen, Tomas

AU - Erkelens, Casper J.

AU - van Ee, Raymond

PY - 2008/11/24

Y1 - 2008/11/24

N2 - When the two eyes are presented with conflicting stimuli, perception starts to fluctuate over time (i.e., binocular rivalry). A similar fluctuation occurs when two patterns are presented to a single eye (i.e., monocular rivalry), or when they are swapped rapidly and repeatedly between the eyes (i.e., stimulus rivalry). Although all these cases lead to rivalry, in quantitative terms these modes of rivalry are generally found to differ significantly. We studied these different modes of rivalry with identical intermittently shown stimuli while varying the temporal layout of stimulation. We show that the quantitative differences between the modes of rivalry are caused by the presence of monocular interactions between the rivaling patterns; the introduction of a blank period just before a stimulus swap changed the number of rivalry reports to the extent that monocular and stimulus rivalries were inducible over ranges of spatial frequency content and contrast values that were nearly identical to binocular rivalry. Moreover when monocular interactions did not occur the perceptual dynamics of monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries were statistically indistinguishable. This range of identical behavior exhibited a monocular (∼50 ms) and a binocular (∼350 ms) limit. We argue that a common binocular, or pattern-based, mechanism determines the temporal constraints for these modes of rivalry.

AB - When the two eyes are presented with conflicting stimuli, perception starts to fluctuate over time (i.e., binocular rivalry). A similar fluctuation occurs when two patterns are presented to a single eye (i.e., monocular rivalry), or when they are swapped rapidly and repeatedly between the eyes (i.e., stimulus rivalry). Although all these cases lead to rivalry, in quantitative terms these modes of rivalry are generally found to differ significantly. We studied these different modes of rivalry with identical intermittently shown stimuli while varying the temporal layout of stimulation. We show that the quantitative differences between the modes of rivalry are caused by the presence of monocular interactions between the rivaling patterns; the introduction of a blank period just before a stimulus swap changed the number of rivalry reports to the extent that monocular and stimulus rivalries were inducible over ranges of spatial frequency content and contrast values that were nearly identical to binocular rivalry. Moreover when monocular interactions did not occur the perceptual dynamics of monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries were statistically indistinguishable. This range of identical behavior exhibited a monocular (∼50 ms) and a binocular (∼350 ms) limit. We argue that a common binocular, or pattern-based, mechanism determines the temporal constraints for these modes of rivalry.

KW - Binocular vision

KW - Bistability

KW - Perceptual organization

KW - Rivalry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56749177286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/8.15.13

DO - 10.1167/8.15.13

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 15

M1 - 13

ER -