Repatriating Human Remains

Searching for an Acceptable Ethics

Adam DICKERSON, Erika Ceeney

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

Abstract

Requests for the repatriation of human remains raise a number of perplexing ethical issues for cultural heritage institutions. The ethics of repatriation is complex, because, as Scarre (J Appl Philos 20:237-249, 2003) points out, it involves a four-way relationship between (1) cultural heritage professionals and institutions, (2) ‘the public’, (3) individuals or communities claiming close cultural and/or kinship ties with the dead and (4) the dead themselves. In this chapter, we examine the key ethical issues raised by this complex relationship and evaluate what they might mean for cultural heritage practice and policy.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Ethics of Cultural Heritage
EditorsTracy Ireland, John Schofield
Place of PublicationNew York, US
PublisherSpringer
Pages89-104
Number of pages16
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781493916498
ISBN (Print)9781493916481
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Publication series

NameThe Ethics of Cultural Heritage

Fingerprint

cultural heritage
remigration
moral philosophy
kinship
community
Human Remains
Cultural Heritage
Ethical Issues
Repatriation

Cite this

DICKERSON, A., & Ceeney, E. (2015). Repatriating Human Remains: Searching for an Acceptable Ethics. In T. Ireland, & J. Schofield (Eds.), The Ethics of Cultural Heritage (1 ed., pp. 89-104). (The Ethics of Cultural Heritage). New York, US: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1649-8_6
DICKERSON, Adam ; Ceeney, Erika. / Repatriating Human Remains : Searching for an Acceptable Ethics. The Ethics of Cultural Heritage. editor / Tracy Ireland ; John Schofield. 1. ed. New York, US : Springer, 2015. pp. 89-104 (The Ethics of Cultural Heritage).
@inbook{e0c349a6e14d4bf2a4e4b281b66c0454,
title = "Repatriating Human Remains: Searching for an Acceptable Ethics",
abstract = "Requests for the repatriation of human remains raise a number of perplexing ethical issues for cultural heritage institutions. The ethics of repatriation is complex, because, as Scarre (J Appl Philos 20:237-249, 2003) points out, it involves a four-way relationship between (1) cultural heritage professionals and institutions, (2) ‘the public’, (3) individuals or communities claiming close cultural and/or kinship ties with the dead and (4) the dead themselves. In this chapter, we examine the key ethical issues raised by this complex relationship and evaluate what they might mean for cultural heritage practice and policy.",
keywords = "repatriation, human remains, Cultural Heritage",
author = "Adam DICKERSON and Erika Ceeney",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4939-1649-8_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781493916481",
series = "The Ethics of Cultural Heritage",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "89--104",
editor = "Tracy Ireland and John Schofield",
booktitle = "The Ethics of Cultural Heritage",
address = "Netherlands",
edition = "1",

}

DICKERSON, A & Ceeney, E 2015, Repatriating Human Remains: Searching for an Acceptable Ethics. in T Ireland & J Schofield (eds), The Ethics of Cultural Heritage. 1 edn, The Ethics of Cultural Heritage, Springer, New York, US, pp. 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1649-8_6

Repatriating Human Remains : Searching for an Acceptable Ethics. / DICKERSON, Adam; Ceeney, Erika.

The Ethics of Cultural Heritage. ed. / Tracy Ireland; John Schofield. 1. ed. New York, US : Springer, 2015. p. 89-104 (The Ethics of Cultural Heritage).

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Repatriating Human Remains

T2 - Searching for an Acceptable Ethics

AU - DICKERSON, Adam

AU - Ceeney, Erika

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Requests for the repatriation of human remains raise a number of perplexing ethical issues for cultural heritage institutions. The ethics of repatriation is complex, because, as Scarre (J Appl Philos 20:237-249, 2003) points out, it involves a four-way relationship between (1) cultural heritage professionals and institutions, (2) ‘the public’, (3) individuals or communities claiming close cultural and/or kinship ties with the dead and (4) the dead themselves. In this chapter, we examine the key ethical issues raised by this complex relationship and evaluate what they might mean for cultural heritage practice and policy.

AB - Requests for the repatriation of human remains raise a number of perplexing ethical issues for cultural heritage institutions. The ethics of repatriation is complex, because, as Scarre (J Appl Philos 20:237-249, 2003) points out, it involves a four-way relationship between (1) cultural heritage professionals and institutions, (2) ‘the public’, (3) individuals or communities claiming close cultural and/or kinship ties with the dead and (4) the dead themselves. In this chapter, we examine the key ethical issues raised by this complex relationship and evaluate what they might mean for cultural heritage practice and policy.

KW - repatriation

KW - human remains

KW - Cultural Heritage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944595912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/repatriating-human-remains-searching-acceptable-ethics

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4939-1649-8_6

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4939-1649-8_6

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781493916481

T3 - The Ethics of Cultural Heritage

SP - 89

EP - 104

BT - The Ethics of Cultural Heritage

A2 - Ireland, Tracy

A2 - Schofield, John

PB - Springer

CY - New York, US

ER -

DICKERSON A, Ceeney E. Repatriating Human Remains: Searching for an Acceptable Ethics. In Ireland T, Schofield J, editors, The Ethics of Cultural Heritage. 1 ed. New York, US: Springer. 2015. p. 89-104. (The Ethics of Cultural Heritage). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1649-8_6