Resolving the invasion paradox

pervasive scale and study dependence in the native-alien species richness relationship

Federico Tomasetto, Richard P. Duncan, Philip E. Hulme

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The degree to which plant communities are vulnerable to invasion by alien species has often been assessed using the relationship between native and alien plant species richness (NAR). Variation in the direction and strength of the NAR tends to be negative for small plot sizes and study extents, but positive for large plots and extents. This invasion paradox has been attributed to different processes driving species richness at different spatial scales. However, the focus on plot size has drawn attention away from other factors influencing the NAR, in part because the influence of other factors may be obscured by or interact with plot size. Here, we test whether variation in the NAR can be explained by covariates linked to community susceptibility to invasion and whether these interact with plot size using a quantitative meta-analysis drawn from 87 field studies that examined 161 NARs. While plot size explained most variation, the NAR was less positive in grassland habitats and in the Australasian region. Other covariates did not show strong relationships with the NAR even after accounting for interactions with plot size. Instead, much of the unexplained variation is associated with article or author specific differences, suggesting the NAR depends strongly on how different authors choose their study system or study design.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1038-1046
Number of pages9
JournalEcology Letters
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

introduced species
species richness
species diversity
Australasian region
introduced plants
meta-analysis
plant communities
grasslands
experimental design
habitats
testing
plant community
grassland
habitat
systems engineering

Cite this

@article{9bb210ac857f4913aa69b3e56253f035,
title = "Resolving the invasion paradox: pervasive scale and study dependence in the native-alien species richness relationship",
abstract = "The degree to which plant communities are vulnerable to invasion by alien species has often been assessed using the relationship between native and alien plant species richness (NAR). Variation in the direction and strength of the NAR tends to be negative for small plot sizes and study extents, but positive for large plots and extents. This invasion paradox has been attributed to different processes driving species richness at different spatial scales. However, the focus on plot size has drawn attention away from other factors influencing the NAR, in part because the influence of other factors may be obscured by or interact with plot size. Here, we test whether variation in the NAR can be explained by covariates linked to community susceptibility to invasion and whether these interact with plot size using a quantitative meta-analysis drawn from 87 field studies that examined 161 NARs. While plot size explained most variation, the NAR was less positive in grassland habitats and in the Australasian region. Other covariates did not show strong relationships with the NAR even after accounting for interactions with plot size. Instead, much of the unexplained variation is associated with article or author specific differences, suggesting the NAR depends strongly on how different authors choose their study system or study design.",
keywords = "Author effect, biological invasions, effect size, heterogeneity, meta-regression, spatial grain, weeds",
author = "Federico Tomasetto and Duncan, {Richard P.} and Hulme, {Philip E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ele.13261",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "1038--1046",
journal = "Ecology Letters",
issn = "1461-023X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Resolving the invasion paradox : pervasive scale and study dependence in the native-alien species richness relationship. / Tomasetto, Federico; Duncan, Richard P.; Hulme, Philip E.

In: Ecology Letters, Vol. 22, No. 6, 01.01.2019, p. 1038-1046.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resolving the invasion paradox

T2 - pervasive scale and study dependence in the native-alien species richness relationship

AU - Tomasetto, Federico

AU - Duncan, Richard P.

AU - Hulme, Philip E.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The degree to which plant communities are vulnerable to invasion by alien species has often been assessed using the relationship between native and alien plant species richness (NAR). Variation in the direction and strength of the NAR tends to be negative for small plot sizes and study extents, but positive for large plots and extents. This invasion paradox has been attributed to different processes driving species richness at different spatial scales. However, the focus on plot size has drawn attention away from other factors influencing the NAR, in part because the influence of other factors may be obscured by or interact with plot size. Here, we test whether variation in the NAR can be explained by covariates linked to community susceptibility to invasion and whether these interact with plot size using a quantitative meta-analysis drawn from 87 field studies that examined 161 NARs. While plot size explained most variation, the NAR was less positive in grassland habitats and in the Australasian region. Other covariates did not show strong relationships with the NAR even after accounting for interactions with plot size. Instead, much of the unexplained variation is associated with article or author specific differences, suggesting the NAR depends strongly on how different authors choose their study system or study design.

AB - The degree to which plant communities are vulnerable to invasion by alien species has often been assessed using the relationship between native and alien plant species richness (NAR). Variation in the direction and strength of the NAR tends to be negative for small plot sizes and study extents, but positive for large plots and extents. This invasion paradox has been attributed to different processes driving species richness at different spatial scales. However, the focus on plot size has drawn attention away from other factors influencing the NAR, in part because the influence of other factors may be obscured by or interact with plot size. Here, we test whether variation in the NAR can be explained by covariates linked to community susceptibility to invasion and whether these interact with plot size using a quantitative meta-analysis drawn from 87 field studies that examined 161 NARs. While plot size explained most variation, the NAR was less positive in grassland habitats and in the Australasian region. Other covariates did not show strong relationships with the NAR even after accounting for interactions with plot size. Instead, much of the unexplained variation is associated with article or author specific differences, suggesting the NAR depends strongly on how different authors choose their study system or study design.

KW - Author effect

KW - biological invasions

KW - effect size

KW - heterogeneity

KW - meta-regression

KW - spatial grain

KW - weeds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063592121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ele.13261

DO - 10.1111/ele.13261

M3 - Review article

VL - 22

SP - 1038

EP - 1046

JO - Ecology Letters

JF - Ecology Letters

SN - 1461-023X

IS - 6

ER -