Respiratory dysfunction in ventilated patients: Can inspiratory muscle training help

Bernie BISSETT, Isabel Leditschke, Jennifer Paratz, Robert Boots

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Respiratory muscle dysfunction is associated with prolonged and difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation. This dysfunction in ventilator-dependent patients is multifactorial: there is evidence that inspiratory muscle weakness is partially explained by disuse atrophy secondary to ventilation, and positive end-expiratory pressure can further reduce muscle strength by negatively shifting the length-tension curve of the diaphragm. Polyneuropathy is also likely to contribute to apparent muscle weakness in critically ill patients, and nutritional and pharmaceutical effects may further compound muscle weakness. Moreover, psychological influences, including anxiety, may contribute to difficulty in weaning. There is recent evidence that inspiratory muscle training is safe and feasible in selected ventilator-dependent patients, and that this training can reduce the weaning period and improve overall weaning success rates. Extrapolating from evidence in sports medicine, as well as the known effects of inspiratory muscle training in chronic lung disease, a theoretical model is proposed to describe how inspiratory muscle training enhances weaning and recovery from mechanical ventilation. Possible mechanisms include increased protein synthesis (both Type 1 and Type 2 muscle fibres), enhanced limb perfusion via dampening of a sympathetically-mediated metaboreflex, reduced lactate levels and modulation of the perception of exertion, resulting in less dyspnoea and enhanced exercise capacity
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)236-246
Number of pages11
JournalAnaesthesia and Intensive Care
Volume40
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Respiratory dysfunction in ventilated patients: Can inspiratory muscle training help'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this