Responding to farm poverty in Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In May 2005, the Commonwealth announced changes to the eligibility criteria for a number of farm welfare payments which have resulted in farmers receiving such payments on more generous terms than other disadvantaged groups in the community. The changes passed largely unremarked by the media or political commentators. Farm welfare programs are developed independently of the general welfare safety net and are based on assumptions about the nature, extent and causes of farm poverty. No comprehensive empirical research has been conducted into farm poverty since the Henderson Inquiry of the 1970s. This paper discusses the issue of farm poverty in Australia and how it fits into the broader welfare debate, and proposes a way forward to develop more effective and equitable farm welfare programs
LanguageEnglish
Pages33-46
Number of pages14
JournalAustralian Journal of Political Science
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

farm
poverty
welfare
empirical research
farmer
cause
community
Group

Cite this

@article{0a8053290540498b87a98cf8c70ca437,
title = "Responding to farm poverty in Australia",
abstract = "In May 2005, the Commonwealth announced changes to the eligibility criteria for a number of farm welfare payments which have resulted in farmers receiving such payments on more generous terms than other disadvantaged groups in the community. The changes passed largely unremarked by the media or political commentators. Farm welfare programs are developed independently of the general welfare safety net and are based on assumptions about the nature, extent and causes of farm poverty. No comprehensive empirical research has been conducted into farm poverty since the Henderson Inquiry of the 1970s. This paper discusses the issue of farm poverty in Australia and how it fits into the broader welfare debate, and proposes a way forward to develop more effective and equitable farm welfare programs",
author = "Linda Botterill",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1080/10361140601158534",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "33--46",
journal = "Australian Journal of Political Science",
issn = "1036-1146",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Responding to farm poverty in Australia. / Botterill, Linda.

In: Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2007, p. 33-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responding to farm poverty in Australia

AU - Botterill, Linda

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - In May 2005, the Commonwealth announced changes to the eligibility criteria for a number of farm welfare payments which have resulted in farmers receiving such payments on more generous terms than other disadvantaged groups in the community. The changes passed largely unremarked by the media or political commentators. Farm welfare programs are developed independently of the general welfare safety net and are based on assumptions about the nature, extent and causes of farm poverty. No comprehensive empirical research has been conducted into farm poverty since the Henderson Inquiry of the 1970s. This paper discusses the issue of farm poverty in Australia and how it fits into the broader welfare debate, and proposes a way forward to develop more effective and equitable farm welfare programs

AB - In May 2005, the Commonwealth announced changes to the eligibility criteria for a number of farm welfare payments which have resulted in farmers receiving such payments on more generous terms than other disadvantaged groups in the community. The changes passed largely unremarked by the media or political commentators. Farm welfare programs are developed independently of the general welfare safety net and are based on assumptions about the nature, extent and causes of farm poverty. No comprehensive empirical research has been conducted into farm poverty since the Henderson Inquiry of the 1970s. This paper discusses the issue of farm poverty in Australia and how it fits into the broader welfare debate, and proposes a way forward to develop more effective and equitable farm welfare programs

U2 - 10.1080/10361140601158534

DO - 10.1080/10361140601158534

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 33

EP - 46

JO - Australian Journal of Political Science

T2 - Australian Journal of Political Science

JF - Australian Journal of Political Science

SN - 1036-1146

IS - 1

ER -