Response to Recommendation 2 of the 2009 NAS Report—Standards for Formatting and Reporting Expert Evaluative Opinions: Where Do We Stand?

Loene Howes, Kristy Martire, Sally KELTY

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalForensic Science Policy management
Volume5
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{5744fde373a24a16b4cbdc3bf8c85a95,
title = "Response to Recommendation 2 of the 2009 NAS Report—Standards for Formatting and Reporting Expert Evaluative Opinions: Where Do We Stand?",
author = "Loene Howes and Kristy Martire and Sally KELTY",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/19409044.2014.880973",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Forensic Science Policy management",
issn = "1940-9036",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Recommendation 2 of the 2009 NAS Report—Standards for Formatting and Reporting Expert Evaluative Opinions: Where Do We Stand?

AU - Howes, Loene

AU - Martire, Kristy

AU - KELTY, Sally

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

U2 - 10.1080/19409044.2014.880973

DO - 10.1080/19409044.2014.880973

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Forensic Science Policy management

JF - Forensic Science Policy management

SN - 1940-9036

IS - 1-2

ER -