Rethinking the role of experts and expertise in behavioural public policy

Peter John, Gerry Stoker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Nudge and behavioural public policy tools have won support from governments across the world for improving the effectiveness of public interventions. Yet nudge still attracts strong criticisms for promoting paternalism and manipulation as legitimate government actions. To move beyond this divide, this paper offers a comprehensive reorientation, which is necessary because the intellectual foundations of the policy are at fault. A more secure foundation can be achieved by expanding the cognitive scope of behavioural policy, and ensuring that it does not rely on the narrow assumption that intuitive reasoning is flawed and that expert advice is always preferable. This shift in the cognitive range of nudge moves behavioural policy toward citizen reflection and initiative, pointing away from expert-led interventions. It amounts to more than incremental advances in nudge practice. As a result, nudge can escape the charge of not respecting individual autonomy. What we call 'nudge plus' would link more closely with other types of governmental intervention that embrace citizen involvement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-225
Number of pages17
JournalPolicy and Politics
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

expertise
public policy
expert
citizens' involvement
paternalism
manipulation
criticism
autonomy
citizen
policy
public

Cite this

@article{96f2a85b348545dda8391d8b0d5a6258,
title = "Rethinking the role of experts and expertise in behavioural public policy",
abstract = "Nudge and behavioural public policy tools have won support from governments across the world for improving the effectiveness of public interventions. Yet nudge still attracts strong criticisms for promoting paternalism and manipulation as legitimate government actions. To move beyond this divide, this paper offers a comprehensive reorientation, which is necessary because the intellectual foundations of the policy are at fault. A more secure foundation can be achieved by expanding the cognitive scope of behavioural policy, and ensuring that it does not rely on the narrow assumption that intuitive reasoning is flawed and that expert advice is always preferable. This shift in the cognitive range of nudge moves behavioural policy toward citizen reflection and initiative, pointing away from expert-led interventions. It amounts to more than incremental advances in nudge practice. As a result, nudge can escape the charge of not respecting individual autonomy. What we call 'nudge plus' would link more closely with other types of governmental intervention that embrace citizen involvement.",
keywords = "nudge, behavioural public policy, behaviour change deliberative, governance, expertise, citizens",
author = "Peter John and Gerry Stoker",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1332/030557319X15526371698257",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "209--225",
journal = "Policy and Politics",
issn = "0305-5736",
publisher = "Policy Press",
number = "2",

}

Rethinking the role of experts and expertise in behavioural public policy. / John, Peter; Stoker, Gerry.

In: Policy and Politics, Vol. 47, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 209-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking the role of experts and expertise in behavioural public policy

AU - John, Peter

AU - Stoker, Gerry

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Nudge and behavioural public policy tools have won support from governments across the world for improving the effectiveness of public interventions. Yet nudge still attracts strong criticisms for promoting paternalism and manipulation as legitimate government actions. To move beyond this divide, this paper offers a comprehensive reorientation, which is necessary because the intellectual foundations of the policy are at fault. A more secure foundation can be achieved by expanding the cognitive scope of behavioural policy, and ensuring that it does not rely on the narrow assumption that intuitive reasoning is flawed and that expert advice is always preferable. This shift in the cognitive range of nudge moves behavioural policy toward citizen reflection and initiative, pointing away from expert-led interventions. It amounts to more than incremental advances in nudge practice. As a result, nudge can escape the charge of not respecting individual autonomy. What we call 'nudge plus' would link more closely with other types of governmental intervention that embrace citizen involvement.

AB - Nudge and behavioural public policy tools have won support from governments across the world for improving the effectiveness of public interventions. Yet nudge still attracts strong criticisms for promoting paternalism and manipulation as legitimate government actions. To move beyond this divide, this paper offers a comprehensive reorientation, which is necessary because the intellectual foundations of the policy are at fault. A more secure foundation can be achieved by expanding the cognitive scope of behavioural policy, and ensuring that it does not rely on the narrow assumption that intuitive reasoning is flawed and that expert advice is always preferable. This shift in the cognitive range of nudge moves behavioural policy toward citizen reflection and initiative, pointing away from expert-led interventions. It amounts to more than incremental advances in nudge practice. As a result, nudge can escape the charge of not respecting individual autonomy. What we call 'nudge plus' would link more closely with other types of governmental intervention that embrace citizen involvement.

KW - nudge

KW - behavioural public policy

KW - behaviour change deliberative

KW - governance

KW - expertise

KW - citizens

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066027938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/rethinking-role-experts-expertise-behavioural-public-policy

U2 - 10.1332/030557319X15526371698257

DO - 10.1332/030557319X15526371698257

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 209

EP - 225

JO - Policy and Politics

JF - Policy and Politics

SN - 0305-5736

IS - 2

ER -