Reverse Greening Australian Landscape Architecture Education:Charting an Indigenous Perspective on Country Respect and Design

David Jones, Darryl Choy, Scott HEYES, Grant Revell, Richard Tucker, Helen Meikle

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

Abstract

While many Australian landscape architecture programs can talk about their green ‘credentials’ and their ethical and design inquiry commitments to sustainability, this is a Western educational pedagogy and agenda. Since the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit (http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm) many and the international policy shift towards sustainability theory and practice, few programs have shifted from nor sought to engage in alternate educational paradigms that offer a non-Western perspective. This paper considers current research that is reviewing the state and agendas of Australian landscape architecture programs, the obligations of their host Australian universities
to reconciliation and offering respect to Australia’s Indigenous communities, the role of the Australian Institute of Landscape Architects (AILA) (http://www.aila.org.au/) as an accreditation body but also an future education agenda-maker, and the initiatives several of these programs are making in addressing these challenges. In particular, the paper reviews the innovativeness
of several programs in re-charting Australian student perspectives about non-Australian and non-Western environmental and cultural knowledge systems and paradigms, and where this may chart Australian landscape architectural education.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe International Federation of Landscape Architecture Conference
EditorsCharles Teo Kae Siang
Place of PublicationSarawak, Malaysia
PublisherInstitute of Landscape Architects Malaysia (ILAM)
Pages1-21
Number of pages21
Volume1
Publication statusPublished - 2014
EventIFLA Asia Pacific Regional Congress - Sarawak, Malaysia
Duration: 25 Apr 201430 Apr 2014

Conference

ConferenceIFLA Asia Pacific Regional Congress
CountryMalaysia
CitySarawak
Period25/04/1430/04/14

Fingerprint

respect
education
sustainability
paradigm
accreditation
architect
reconciliation
obligation
commitment
knowledge
community
student

Cite this

Jones, D., Choy, D., HEYES, S., Revell, G., Tucker, R., & Meikle, H. (2014). Reverse Greening Australian Landscape Architecture Education:Charting an Indigenous Perspective on Country Respect and Design. In C. T. K. Siang (Ed.), The International Federation of Landscape Architecture Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 1-21). Sarawak, Malaysia: Institute of Landscape Architects Malaysia (ILAM).
Jones, David ; Choy, Darryl ; HEYES, Scott ; Revell, Grant ; Tucker, Richard ; Meikle, Helen. / Reverse Greening Australian Landscape Architecture Education:Charting an Indigenous Perspective on Country Respect and Design. The International Federation of Landscape Architecture Conference. editor / Charles Teo Kae Siang. Vol. 1 Sarawak, Malaysia : Institute of Landscape Architects Malaysia (ILAM), 2014. pp. 1-21
@inproceedings{5b4c30002a234acab8d882a7b03eb90e,
title = "Reverse Greening Australian Landscape Architecture Education:Charting an Indigenous Perspective on Country Respect and Design",
abstract = "While many Australian landscape architecture programs can talk about their green ‘credentials’ and their ethical and design inquiry commitments to sustainability, this is a Western educational pedagogy and agenda. Since the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit (http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm) many and the international policy shift towards sustainability theory and practice, few programs have shifted from nor sought to engage in alternate educational paradigms that offer a non-Western perspective. This paper considers current research that is reviewing the state and agendas of Australian landscape architecture programs, the obligations of their host Australian universitiesto reconciliation and offering respect to Australia’s Indigenous communities, the role of the Australian Institute of Landscape Architects (AILA) (http://www.aila.org.au/) as an accreditation body but also an future education agenda-maker, and the initiatives several of these programs are making in addressing these challenges. In particular, the paper reviews the innovativenessof several programs in re-charting Australian student perspectives about non-Australian and non-Western environmental and cultural knowledge systems and paradigms, and where this may chart Australian landscape architectural education.",
keywords = "Indigenous knowledge systems, Australian landscape architecture education.",
author = "David Jones and Darryl Choy and Scott HEYES and Grant Revell and Richard Tucker and Helen Meikle",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "1--21",
editor = "Siang, {Charles Teo Kae}",
booktitle = "The International Federation of Landscape Architecture Conference",
publisher = "Institute of Landscape Architects Malaysia (ILAM)",

}

Jones, D, Choy, D, HEYES, S, Revell, G, Tucker, R & Meikle, H 2014, Reverse Greening Australian Landscape Architecture Education:Charting an Indigenous Perspective on Country Respect and Design. in CTK Siang (ed.), The International Federation of Landscape Architecture Conference. vol. 1, Institute of Landscape Architects Malaysia (ILAM), Sarawak, Malaysia, pp. 1-21, IFLA Asia Pacific Regional Congress, Sarawak, Malaysia, 25/04/14.

Reverse Greening Australian Landscape Architecture Education:Charting an Indigenous Perspective on Country Respect and Design. / Jones, David; Choy, Darryl; HEYES, Scott; Revell, Grant; Tucker, Richard; Meikle, Helen.

The International Federation of Landscape Architecture Conference. ed. / Charles Teo Kae Siang. Vol. 1 Sarawak, Malaysia : Institute of Landscape Architects Malaysia (ILAM), 2014. p. 1-21.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Reverse Greening Australian Landscape Architecture Education:Charting an Indigenous Perspective on Country Respect and Design

AU - Jones, David

AU - Choy, Darryl

AU - HEYES, Scott

AU - Revell, Grant

AU - Tucker, Richard

AU - Meikle, Helen

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - While many Australian landscape architecture programs can talk about their green ‘credentials’ and their ethical and design inquiry commitments to sustainability, this is a Western educational pedagogy and agenda. Since the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit (http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm) many and the international policy shift towards sustainability theory and practice, few programs have shifted from nor sought to engage in alternate educational paradigms that offer a non-Western perspective. This paper considers current research that is reviewing the state and agendas of Australian landscape architecture programs, the obligations of their host Australian universitiesto reconciliation and offering respect to Australia’s Indigenous communities, the role of the Australian Institute of Landscape Architects (AILA) (http://www.aila.org.au/) as an accreditation body but also an future education agenda-maker, and the initiatives several of these programs are making in addressing these challenges. In particular, the paper reviews the innovativenessof several programs in re-charting Australian student perspectives about non-Australian and non-Western environmental and cultural knowledge systems and paradigms, and where this may chart Australian landscape architectural education.

AB - While many Australian landscape architecture programs can talk about their green ‘credentials’ and their ethical and design inquiry commitments to sustainability, this is a Western educational pedagogy and agenda. Since the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit (http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm) many and the international policy shift towards sustainability theory and practice, few programs have shifted from nor sought to engage in alternate educational paradigms that offer a non-Western perspective. This paper considers current research that is reviewing the state and agendas of Australian landscape architecture programs, the obligations of their host Australian universitiesto reconciliation and offering respect to Australia’s Indigenous communities, the role of the Australian Institute of Landscape Architects (AILA) (http://www.aila.org.au/) as an accreditation body but also an future education agenda-maker, and the initiatives several of these programs are making in addressing these challenges. In particular, the paper reviews the innovativenessof several programs in re-charting Australian student perspectives about non-Australian and non-Western environmental and cultural knowledge systems and paradigms, and where this may chart Australian landscape architectural education.

KW - Indigenous knowledge systems

KW - Australian landscape architecture education.

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 1

SP - 1

EP - 21

BT - The International Federation of Landscape Architecture Conference

A2 - Siang, Charles Teo Kae

PB - Institute of Landscape Architects Malaysia (ILAM)

CY - Sarawak, Malaysia

ER -

Jones D, Choy D, HEYES S, Revell G, Tucker R, Meikle H. Reverse Greening Australian Landscape Architecture Education:Charting an Indigenous Perspective on Country Respect and Design. In Siang CTK, editor, The International Federation of Landscape Architecture Conference. Vol. 1. Sarawak, Malaysia: Institute of Landscape Architects Malaysia (ILAM). 2014. p. 1-21