Review and analysis of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program

Brenda Happell, Chris Platania-Phung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to review and synthesise research on the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program (MHNIP) to ascertain the benefits and limitations of this initiative for people with mental illness, general practitioners, mental health nurses and the wider community. Methods: An electronic and manual search was made of the research literature for MHNIP in May 2017. Features of studies, including cohorts and findings, were tabulated and cross-study patterns in program processes and outcomes were closely compared. Results: Seventeen reports of primary research data have been released. Triangulation of data from different cohorts, regions and design show that the program has been successful on the primary objectives of increased access to primary mental health care, and has received positive feedback from all major stakeholders. Although the program has been broadly beneficial to consumer health, there are inequities in access for people with mental illness. Conclusions: The MHNIP greatly benefits the health of people with mental illness. Larger and more representative sampling of consumers is needed, as well as intensive case studies to provide a more comprehensive and effective understanding of the benefits and limitations of the program as it evolves with the establishment of primary health networks. What is known about the topic?: The MHNIP is designed to increase access to mental health care in primary care settings such as general practice clinics. Studies have reported favourable views about the program. However, research is limited and further investigation is required to demonstrate the strengths and limitations of the program. What does this paper add?: All studies reviewed reported that the MHNIP had positive implications for people with severe and persistent mental illness. Qualitative research has been most prevalent for mental health nurse views and research on Health of the Nation Outcome Scale scores for recipients of the program. There is more research on system dimensions than on person-centred care. Mental health consumers, carers and families have been neglected in the establishment, engagement and evaluation of the MHNIP. What are the implications for practitioners?: A more systematic, national-level research program into the MHNIP is required that is centred more on the experiences of people with mental illness.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberAH17017
Pages (from-to)111-119
Number of pages9
JournalAustralian Health Review
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Motivation
Mental Health
Nurses
Research
Primary Health Care
Health
Health Services Accessibility
Qualitative Research
Insurance Benefits
General Practice
General Practitioners
Caregivers
Cohort Studies

Cite this

Happell, Brenda ; Platania-Phung, Chris. / Review and analysis of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program. In: Australian Health Review. 2019 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 111-119.
@article{7fb29535c35b4a9d8c10d7a9cc9507a5,
title = "Review and analysis of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of the present study was to review and synthesise research on the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program (MHNIP) to ascertain the benefits and limitations of this initiative for people with mental illness, general practitioners, mental health nurses and the wider community. Methods: An electronic and manual search was made of the research literature for MHNIP in May 2017. Features of studies, including cohorts and findings, were tabulated and cross-study patterns in program processes and outcomes were closely compared. Results: Seventeen reports of primary research data have been released. Triangulation of data from different cohorts, regions and design show that the program has been successful on the primary objectives of increased access to primary mental health care, and has received positive feedback from all major stakeholders. Although the program has been broadly beneficial to consumer health, there are inequities in access for people with mental illness. Conclusions: The MHNIP greatly benefits the health of people with mental illness. Larger and more representative sampling of consumers is needed, as well as intensive case studies to provide a more comprehensive and effective understanding of the benefits and limitations of the program as it evolves with the establishment of primary health networks. What is known about the topic?: The MHNIP is designed to increase access to mental health care in primary care settings such as general practice clinics. Studies have reported favourable views about the program. However, research is limited and further investigation is required to demonstrate the strengths and limitations of the program. What does this paper add?: All studies reviewed reported that the MHNIP had positive implications for people with severe and persistent mental illness. Qualitative research has been most prevalent for mental health nurse views and research on Health of the Nation Outcome Scale scores for recipients of the program. There is more research on system dimensions than on person-centred care. Mental health consumers, carers and families have been neglected in the establishment, engagement and evaluation of the MHNIP. What are the implications for practitioners?: A more systematic, national-level research program into the MHNIP is required that is centred more on the experiences of people with mental illness.",
keywords = "health equity, literature review, mental illness, nursing, primary care settings",
author = "Brenda Happell and Chris Platania-Phung",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1071/AH17017",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "111--119",
journal = "Australia Health Review",
issn = "1743-8462",
publisher = "CSIRO",
number = "1",

}

Happell, B & Platania-Phung, C 2019, 'Review and analysis of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program', Australian Health Review, vol. 43, no. 1, AH17017, pp. 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17017

Review and analysis of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program. / Happell, Brenda; Platania-Phung, Chris.

In: Australian Health Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, AH17017, 2019, p. 111-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review and analysis of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program

AU - Happell, Brenda

AU - Platania-Phung, Chris

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Objective: The aim of the present study was to review and synthesise research on the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program (MHNIP) to ascertain the benefits and limitations of this initiative for people with mental illness, general practitioners, mental health nurses and the wider community. Methods: An electronic and manual search was made of the research literature for MHNIP in May 2017. Features of studies, including cohorts and findings, were tabulated and cross-study patterns in program processes and outcomes were closely compared. Results: Seventeen reports of primary research data have been released. Triangulation of data from different cohorts, regions and design show that the program has been successful on the primary objectives of increased access to primary mental health care, and has received positive feedback from all major stakeholders. Although the program has been broadly beneficial to consumer health, there are inequities in access for people with mental illness. Conclusions: The MHNIP greatly benefits the health of people with mental illness. Larger and more representative sampling of consumers is needed, as well as intensive case studies to provide a more comprehensive and effective understanding of the benefits and limitations of the program as it evolves with the establishment of primary health networks. What is known about the topic?: The MHNIP is designed to increase access to mental health care in primary care settings such as general practice clinics. Studies have reported favourable views about the program. However, research is limited and further investigation is required to demonstrate the strengths and limitations of the program. What does this paper add?: All studies reviewed reported that the MHNIP had positive implications for people with severe and persistent mental illness. Qualitative research has been most prevalent for mental health nurse views and research on Health of the Nation Outcome Scale scores for recipients of the program. There is more research on system dimensions than on person-centred care. Mental health consumers, carers and families have been neglected in the establishment, engagement and evaluation of the MHNIP. What are the implications for practitioners?: A more systematic, national-level research program into the MHNIP is required that is centred more on the experiences of people with mental illness.

AB - Objective: The aim of the present study was to review and synthesise research on the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program (MHNIP) to ascertain the benefits and limitations of this initiative for people with mental illness, general practitioners, mental health nurses and the wider community. Methods: An electronic and manual search was made of the research literature for MHNIP in May 2017. Features of studies, including cohorts and findings, were tabulated and cross-study patterns in program processes and outcomes were closely compared. Results: Seventeen reports of primary research data have been released. Triangulation of data from different cohorts, regions and design show that the program has been successful on the primary objectives of increased access to primary mental health care, and has received positive feedback from all major stakeholders. Although the program has been broadly beneficial to consumer health, there are inequities in access for people with mental illness. Conclusions: The MHNIP greatly benefits the health of people with mental illness. Larger and more representative sampling of consumers is needed, as well as intensive case studies to provide a more comprehensive and effective understanding of the benefits and limitations of the program as it evolves with the establishment of primary health networks. What is known about the topic?: The MHNIP is designed to increase access to mental health care in primary care settings such as general practice clinics. Studies have reported favourable views about the program. However, research is limited and further investigation is required to demonstrate the strengths and limitations of the program. What does this paper add?: All studies reviewed reported that the MHNIP had positive implications for people with severe and persistent mental illness. Qualitative research has been most prevalent for mental health nurse views and research on Health of the Nation Outcome Scale scores for recipients of the program. There is more research on system dimensions than on person-centred care. Mental health consumers, carers and families have been neglected in the establishment, engagement and evaluation of the MHNIP. What are the implications for practitioners?: A more systematic, national-level research program into the MHNIP is required that is centred more on the experiences of people with mental illness.

KW - health equity

KW - literature review

KW - mental illness

KW - nursing

KW - primary care settings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049169657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/review-analysis-mental-health-nurse-incentive-program

U2 - 10.1071/AH17017

DO - 10.1071/AH17017

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 111

EP - 119

JO - Australia Health Review

JF - Australia Health Review

SN - 1743-8462

IS - 1

M1 - AH17017

ER -