TY - JOUR
T1 - Reviewing Health Service and Program Evaluations in Indigenous Contexts: A Systematic Review
AU - Maddox, Raglan
AU - Blais, Genevieve
AU - Mashford-Pringle, Angela
AU - Monchalin, Renee
AU - Firestone, Michelle
AU - Ziegler, Carolyn
AU - Ninomiya, Melody Morton
AU - Smylie, Janet
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was funded by the provincial Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (MOHLTC).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - This study systematically reviewed evidence regarding health program and service evaluations in Indigenous contexts. Following the PRISMA guidelines and combining terms for ‘Indigenous populations’ and ‘health programs and services’. Eight principles emerged: Principle 1: Adopting Indigenous led or co-led approaches is vital to balance power relationships by prioritizing self-determination, Principle 2: Evaluation team should include local Indigenous community members, Principle 3: Indigenous community knowledge and practice should be foundational, Principle 4: Evaluations must be responsive and flexible to meet the needs of the local community, Principle 5: Evaluations should respect and adhere to local Indigenous protocols, culture, wisdom and language, Principle 6: Evaluations should emphasize reciprocity, shared learnings and capacity building, Principle 7: It is important to build strong relationships and trust between and within researcher teams, evaluators and communities, and Principle 8: The evaluation team must acknowledge community capacity and resources by investing in time and relationships.
AB - This study systematically reviewed evidence regarding health program and service evaluations in Indigenous contexts. Following the PRISMA guidelines and combining terms for ‘Indigenous populations’ and ‘health programs and services’. Eight principles emerged: Principle 1: Adopting Indigenous led or co-led approaches is vital to balance power relationships by prioritizing self-determination, Principle 2: Evaluation team should include local Indigenous community members, Principle 3: Indigenous community knowledge and practice should be foundational, Principle 4: Evaluations must be responsive and flexible to meet the needs of the local community, Principle 5: Evaluations should respect and adhere to local Indigenous protocols, culture, wisdom and language, Principle 6: Evaluations should emphasize reciprocity, shared learnings and capacity building, Principle 7: It is important to build strong relationships and trust between and within researcher teams, evaluators and communities, and Principle 8: The evaluation team must acknowledge community capacity and resources by investing in time and relationships.
KW - Indigenous peoples
KW - Indigenous evaluation
KW - cultural responsiveness
KW - health
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109913522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1098214020940409
DO - 10.1177/1098214020940409
M3 - Article
SN - 1098-2140
VL - 42
SP - 332
EP - 353
JO - American Journal of Evaluation
JF - American Journal of Evaluation
IS - 3
ER -