Revisiting vicarious liability in sexual harassment cases heard under the Sex Discrimination Act

Patricia EASTEAL, Skye Saunders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article considers recent trends in the judicial interpretation of workplace vicarious liability provisions with respect to sexual harassment matters under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) (SDA). In a study undertaken by the authors in 2008, we found that the Federal Court and Federal Magistrates Court appeared to be taking a ‘broad-brush’ approach in interpreting employers’ duty to take ‘all reasonable steps’ to prevent sexual harassment and defining ‘in connection with employment’. The authors update that analysis and evaluate a sample of cases from 2011 to 2018, concluding that it is possible the Courts are approaching these legislative elements of vicarious liability with an increasingly narrow brush.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalAlternative Law Journal
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

sexual harassment
liability
discrimination
act
employer
workplace
interpretation
trend

Cite this

@article{1203cdfed8b045f0ae3e22c472d6edb8,
title = "Revisiting vicarious liability in sexual harassment cases heard under the Sex Discrimination Act",
abstract = "This article considers recent trends in the judicial interpretation of workplace vicarious liability provisions with respect to sexual harassment matters under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) (SDA). In a study undertaken by the authors in 2008, we found that the Federal Court and Federal Magistrates Court appeared to be taking a ‘broad-brush’ approach in interpreting employers’ duty to take ‘all reasonable steps’ to prevent sexual harassment and defining ‘in connection with employment’. The authors update that analysis and evaluate a sample of cases from 2011 to 2018, concluding that it is possible the Courts are approaching these legislative elements of vicarious liability with an increasingly narrow brush.",
keywords = "Sexual harassment, vicarious liability, Sex Discrimination Act, discrimination law",
author = "Patricia EASTEAL and Skye Saunders",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1177/1037969X19877736",
language = "English",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Alternative Law Journal",
issn = "1037-969X",
publisher = "Legal Service Bulletin Co-operative Ltd",

}

Revisiting vicarious liability in sexual harassment cases heard under the Sex Discrimination Act. / EASTEAL, Patricia; Saunders, Skye.

In: Alternative Law Journal, 12.11.2019, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting vicarious liability in sexual harassment cases heard under the Sex Discrimination Act

AU - EASTEAL, Patricia

AU - Saunders, Skye

PY - 2019/11/12

Y1 - 2019/11/12

N2 - This article considers recent trends in the judicial interpretation of workplace vicarious liability provisions with respect to sexual harassment matters under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) (SDA). In a study undertaken by the authors in 2008, we found that the Federal Court and Federal Magistrates Court appeared to be taking a ‘broad-brush’ approach in interpreting employers’ duty to take ‘all reasonable steps’ to prevent sexual harassment and defining ‘in connection with employment’. The authors update that analysis and evaluate a sample of cases from 2011 to 2018, concluding that it is possible the Courts are approaching these legislative elements of vicarious liability with an increasingly narrow brush.

AB - This article considers recent trends in the judicial interpretation of workplace vicarious liability provisions with respect to sexual harassment matters under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) (SDA). In a study undertaken by the authors in 2008, we found that the Federal Court and Federal Magistrates Court appeared to be taking a ‘broad-brush’ approach in interpreting employers’ duty to take ‘all reasonable steps’ to prevent sexual harassment and defining ‘in connection with employment’. The authors update that analysis and evaluate a sample of cases from 2011 to 2018, concluding that it is possible the Courts are approaching these legislative elements of vicarious liability with an increasingly narrow brush.

KW - Sexual harassment

KW - vicarious liability

KW - Sex Discrimination Act

KW - discrimination law

U2 - 10.1177/1037969X19877736

DO - 10.1177/1037969X19877736

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Alternative Law Journal

JF - Alternative Law Journal

SN - 1037-969X

ER -