Risk and emotion: towards an alternative theoretical perspective

Deborah Lupton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

While it is generally accepted in writings on the sociocultural aspects of risk that risk and emotion are interrelated, this relationship remains under-theorised. The literature on the affect heuristic model in psychology and research on voluntary risk-taking or edgework in sociology have dominated previous writings on risk and emotion. This essay draws on scholarship from affect theory, cultural studies and cultural geography to argue that both emotion and risk are inevitably and always configured via social and cultural processes and through interaction with others' bodies, material objects, space and place. Furthermore, both emotions and risk judgements and understandings, rather than being located within the individual, are fluid, shared and collective. The concept of the emotion-risk assemblage' is introduced to denote a heterogeneous configuration of ideational and material, human and non-human elements that is subject to constant flux and change. I illustrate this analysis with some observations about the emotional elements of risk in the context of public health practice. I argue that although public health discourse represents the field as dispassionately expert and rational, its practices frequently engage affective strategies that covertly, and sometimes overtly, incite or reproduce stigmatisation, marginalisation, blaming, shame, disgust, fear and exclusion of certain social groups
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalHealth, Risk and Society
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Emotions
Public Health Practice
Shame
Stereotyping
Geography
Sociology
Risk-Taking
Fear
Public Health
Psychology
Research

Cite this

@article{e27997385d2645ed9dc2273df534df3f,
title = "Risk and emotion: towards an alternative theoretical perspective",
abstract = "While it is generally accepted in writings on the sociocultural aspects of risk that risk and emotion are interrelated, this relationship remains under-theorised. The literature on the affect heuristic model in psychology and research on voluntary risk-taking or edgework in sociology have dominated previous writings on risk and emotion. This essay draws on scholarship from affect theory, cultural studies and cultural geography to argue that both emotion and risk are inevitably and always configured via social and cultural processes and through interaction with others' bodies, material objects, space and place. Furthermore, both emotions and risk judgements and understandings, rather than being located within the individual, are fluid, shared and collective. The concept of the emotion-risk assemblage' is introduced to denote a heterogeneous configuration of ideational and material, human and non-human elements that is subject to constant flux and change. I illustrate this analysis with some observations about the emotional elements of risk in the context of public health practice. I argue that although public health discourse represents the field as dispassionately expert and rational, its practices frequently engage affective strategies that covertly, and sometimes overtly, incite or reproduce stigmatisation, marginalisation, blaming, shame, disgust, fear and exclusion of certain social groups",
keywords = "risk, emotion, Affect theory, emotion-risk, assemblage, public health",
author = "Deborah Lupton",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/13698575.2013.848847",
language = "English",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Health, Risk and Society",
issn = "1369-8575",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Risk and emotion: towards an alternative theoretical perspective. / Lupton, Deborah.

In: Health, Risk and Society, 2013, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk and emotion: towards an alternative theoretical perspective

AU - Lupton, Deborah

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - While it is generally accepted in writings on the sociocultural aspects of risk that risk and emotion are interrelated, this relationship remains under-theorised. The literature on the affect heuristic model in psychology and research on voluntary risk-taking or edgework in sociology have dominated previous writings on risk and emotion. This essay draws on scholarship from affect theory, cultural studies and cultural geography to argue that both emotion and risk are inevitably and always configured via social and cultural processes and through interaction with others' bodies, material objects, space and place. Furthermore, both emotions and risk judgements and understandings, rather than being located within the individual, are fluid, shared and collective. The concept of the emotion-risk assemblage' is introduced to denote a heterogeneous configuration of ideational and material, human and non-human elements that is subject to constant flux and change. I illustrate this analysis with some observations about the emotional elements of risk in the context of public health practice. I argue that although public health discourse represents the field as dispassionately expert and rational, its practices frequently engage affective strategies that covertly, and sometimes overtly, incite or reproduce stigmatisation, marginalisation, blaming, shame, disgust, fear and exclusion of certain social groups

AB - While it is generally accepted in writings on the sociocultural aspects of risk that risk and emotion are interrelated, this relationship remains under-theorised. The literature on the affect heuristic model in psychology and research on voluntary risk-taking or edgework in sociology have dominated previous writings on risk and emotion. This essay draws on scholarship from affect theory, cultural studies and cultural geography to argue that both emotion and risk are inevitably and always configured via social and cultural processes and through interaction with others' bodies, material objects, space and place. Furthermore, both emotions and risk judgements and understandings, rather than being located within the individual, are fluid, shared and collective. The concept of the emotion-risk assemblage' is introduced to denote a heterogeneous configuration of ideational and material, human and non-human elements that is subject to constant flux and change. I illustrate this analysis with some observations about the emotional elements of risk in the context of public health practice. I argue that although public health discourse represents the field as dispassionately expert and rational, its practices frequently engage affective strategies that covertly, and sometimes overtly, incite or reproduce stigmatisation, marginalisation, blaming, shame, disgust, fear and exclusion of certain social groups

KW - risk

KW - emotion

KW - Affect theory

KW - emotion-risk

KW - assemblage

KW - public health

U2 - 10.1080/13698575.2013.848847

DO - 10.1080/13698575.2013.848847

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Health, Risk and Society

JF - Health, Risk and Society

SN - 1369-8575

ER -