Risk issue adoption in an online social movement field

Mathieu O'NEIL, Robert Ackland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article extends the field conceptualisation of social change and innovation adoption, which hinges upon the strategic capacities of actors, to the online environment. We focus on a key aspect of social movement organisations (SMOs), competition for members, resources and attention over an environmental risk issue. The incorporation of network theory enables us to map how the structural position of actors in the field is associated with their actions – for example, their response to an exogenous shock such as a new threat to the environment. We analyse how actors in the online environmental movement respond to the emergence of nanoscience and technology (NST) as a risk issue, and test the field theory hypothesis that dominated actors are more likely to adopt this issue in the early stages of emergence. Our findings challenge field theory orthodoxy and suggest that whilst challengers innovate, dominants co-opt by adopting the issue in a second stage. Finally, we examine why the notion that NST entails significant environmental and health risks was not propelled into wider public consciousness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalInformation Communication and Society
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2019

Fingerprint

Nanoscience
field theory
social movement
Health risks
Circuit theory
Hinges
health risk
Technology
consciousness
social change
Environmental Health
Innovation
threat
innovation
Social Change
Consciousness
Shock
Organizations
resources

Cite this

@article{fd4b0fe7b8e7417d971792c73af3041e,
title = "Risk issue adoption in an online social movement field",
abstract = "This article extends the field conceptualisation of social change and innovation adoption, which hinges upon the strategic capacities of actors, to the online environment. We focus on a key aspect of social movement organisations (SMOs), competition for members, resources and attention over an environmental risk issue. The incorporation of network theory enables us to map how the structural position of actors in the field is associated with their actions – for example, their response to an exogenous shock such as a new threat to the environment. We analyse how actors in the online environmental movement respond to the emergence of nanoscience and technology (NST) as a risk issue, and test the field theory hypothesis that dominated actors are more likely to adopt this issue in the early stages of emergence. Our findings challenge field theory orthodoxy and suggest that whilst challengers innovate, dominants co-opt by adopting the issue in a second stage. Finally, we examine why the notion that NST entails significant environmental and health risks was not propelled into wider public consciousness.",
keywords = "Environmental communication; nanotechnology; organisational fields; social networks; social movements",
author = "Mathieu O'NEIL and Robert Ackland",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/1369118X.2019.1620823",
language = "English",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Information Communication and Society",
issn = "1369-118X",
publisher = "Brunner-Routledge",

}

Risk issue adoption in an online social movement field. / O'NEIL, Mathieu; Ackland, Robert.

In: Information Communication and Society, 2019, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk issue adoption in an online social movement field

AU - O'NEIL, Mathieu

AU - Ackland, Robert

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article extends the field conceptualisation of social change and innovation adoption, which hinges upon the strategic capacities of actors, to the online environment. We focus on a key aspect of social movement organisations (SMOs), competition for members, resources and attention over an environmental risk issue. The incorporation of network theory enables us to map how the structural position of actors in the field is associated with their actions – for example, their response to an exogenous shock such as a new threat to the environment. We analyse how actors in the online environmental movement respond to the emergence of nanoscience and technology (NST) as a risk issue, and test the field theory hypothesis that dominated actors are more likely to adopt this issue in the early stages of emergence. Our findings challenge field theory orthodoxy and suggest that whilst challengers innovate, dominants co-opt by adopting the issue in a second stage. Finally, we examine why the notion that NST entails significant environmental and health risks was not propelled into wider public consciousness.

AB - This article extends the field conceptualisation of social change and innovation adoption, which hinges upon the strategic capacities of actors, to the online environment. We focus on a key aspect of social movement organisations (SMOs), competition for members, resources and attention over an environmental risk issue. The incorporation of network theory enables us to map how the structural position of actors in the field is associated with their actions – for example, their response to an exogenous shock such as a new threat to the environment. We analyse how actors in the online environmental movement respond to the emergence of nanoscience and technology (NST) as a risk issue, and test the field theory hypothesis that dominated actors are more likely to adopt this issue in the early stages of emergence. Our findings challenge field theory orthodoxy and suggest that whilst challengers innovate, dominants co-opt by adopting the issue in a second stage. Finally, we examine why the notion that NST entails significant environmental and health risks was not propelled into wider public consciousness.

KW - Environmental communication; nanotechnology; organisational fields; social networks; social movements

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067561353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/risk-issue-adoption-online-social-movement-field

U2 - 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1620823

DO - 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1620823

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Information Communication and Society

JF - Information Communication and Society

SN - 1369-118X

ER -