Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Canberra Research Portal Home
Home
Profiles
Research output
Projects
Press/Media
Activities
Research units
Prizes
Student theses
Impacts
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
River condition assessment may depend on the sub-sampling method: field live-sort versus laboratory sub-sampling of invertebrates for bioassessment
Susan Nichols, Richard Norris
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
22
Citations (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'River condition assessment may depend on the sub-sampling method: field live-sort versus laboratory sub-sampling of invertebrates for bioassessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Bioassessment
100%
River Condition Assessment
100%
Invertebrates
100%
Subsampling Methods
100%
Predictive Models
50%
Site Assessment
50%
Taxonomic Differences
25%
Model Output
25%
Freshwater Ecosystems
25%
Site Conditions
25%
Aquatic Macroinvertebrates
25%
Biological Evaluation
25%
Number of Sites
25%
Sorter
25%
Method Bias
25%
Observed-to-expected Ratio
25%
Sampling Approach
25%
Sample Composition
25%
Taxonomic Richness
25%
Sorting System
25%
Biological Indicators
25%
Splitter
25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Biological Indicator
100%
Freshwater Ecosystem
100%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Spring
100%
Macroinvertebrate
16%
Freshwater Ecosystem
16%
Biological Assessment
16%
Immunology and Microbiology
Taxon
100%
Macroinvertebrate
25%