River restoration

E. Wohl, P.L. Angermeier, B.P. Bledsoe, G.M. Kondolf, L. MacDonnell, D.M. Merritt, M.A. Palmer, LeRoy POFF, D. Tarboton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    333 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    River restoration is at the forefront of applied hydrologic science. However, many river restoration projects are conducted with minimal scientific context. We propose two themes around which a research agenda to advance the scientific basis for river restoration can be built. First, because natural variability is an inherent feature of all river systems, we hypothesize that restoration of process is more likely to succeed than restoration aimed at a fixed end point. Second, because physical, chemical, and biological processes are interconnected in complex ways across watersheds and across timescales, we hypothesize that restoration projects are more likely to be successful in achieving goals if undertaken in the context of entire watersheds. To achieve restoration objectives, the science of river restoration must include (1) an explicit recognition of the known complexities and uncertainties, (2) continued development of a theoretical framework that enables us to identify generalities among river systems and to ask relevant questions, (3) enhancing the science and use of restoration monitoring by measuring the most effective set of variables at the correct scales of measurement, (4) linking science and implementation, and (5) developing methods of restoration that are effective within existing constraints. Key limitations to river restoration include a lack of scientific knowledge of watershed-scale process dynamics, institutional structures that are poorly suited to large-scale adaptive management, and a lack of political support to reestablish delivery of the ecosystem amenities lost through river degradation. This paper outlines an approach for addressing these shortcomings
    Original languageUndefined
    Pages (from-to)W10301-1-W10301-12
    JournalWater Resources Research
    Volume41
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Cite this

    Wohl, E., Angermeier, P. L., Bledsoe, B. P., Kondolf, G. M., MacDonnell, L., Merritt, D. M., ... Tarboton, D. (2005). River restoration. Water Resources Research, 41(10), W10301-1-W10301-12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003985
    Wohl, E. ; Angermeier, P.L. ; Bledsoe, B.P. ; Kondolf, G.M. ; MacDonnell, L. ; Merritt, D.M. ; Palmer, M.A. ; POFF, LeRoy ; Tarboton, D. / River restoration. In: Water Resources Research. 2005 ; Vol. 41, No. 10. pp. W10301-1-W10301-12.
    @article{da3f3284adbd4b6bb630ce822153fdb7,
    title = "River restoration",
    abstract = "River restoration is at the forefront of applied hydrologic science. However, many river restoration projects are conducted with minimal scientific context. We propose two themes around which a research agenda to advance the scientific basis for river restoration can be built. First, because natural variability is an inherent feature of all river systems, we hypothesize that restoration of process is more likely to succeed than restoration aimed at a fixed end point. Second, because physical, chemical, and biological processes are interconnected in complex ways across watersheds and across timescales, we hypothesize that restoration projects are more likely to be successful in achieving goals if undertaken in the context of entire watersheds. To achieve restoration objectives, the science of river restoration must include (1) an explicit recognition of the known complexities and uncertainties, (2) continued development of a theoretical framework that enables us to identify generalities among river systems and to ask relevant questions, (3) enhancing the science and use of restoration monitoring by measuring the most effective set of variables at the correct scales of measurement, (4) linking science and implementation, and (5) developing methods of restoration that are effective within existing constraints. Key limitations to river restoration include a lack of scientific knowledge of watershed-scale process dynamics, institutional structures that are poorly suited to large-scale adaptive management, and a lack of political support to reestablish delivery of the ecosystem amenities lost through river degradation. This paper outlines an approach for addressing these shortcomings",
    author = "E. Wohl and P.L. Angermeier and B.P. Bledsoe and G.M. Kondolf and L. MacDonnell and D.M. Merritt and M.A. Palmer and LeRoy POFF and D. Tarboton",
    note = "cited By 272",
    year = "2005",
    doi = "10.1029/2005WR003985",
    language = "Undefined",
    volume = "41",
    pages = "W10301--1--W10301--12",
    journal = "Water Resources Research",
    issn = "0043-1397",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "10",

    }

    Wohl, E, Angermeier, PL, Bledsoe, BP, Kondolf, GM, MacDonnell, L, Merritt, DM, Palmer, MA, POFF, L & Tarboton, D 2005, 'River restoration', Water Resources Research, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. W10301-1-W10301-12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003985

    River restoration. / Wohl, E.; Angermeier, P.L.; Bledsoe, B.P.; Kondolf, G.M.; MacDonnell, L.; Merritt, D.M.; Palmer, M.A.; POFF, LeRoy; Tarboton, D.

    In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 41, No. 10, 2005, p. W10301-1-W10301-12.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - River restoration

    AU - Wohl, E.

    AU - Angermeier, P.L.

    AU - Bledsoe, B.P.

    AU - Kondolf, G.M.

    AU - MacDonnell, L.

    AU - Merritt, D.M.

    AU - Palmer, M.A.

    AU - POFF, LeRoy

    AU - Tarboton, D.

    N1 - cited By 272

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - River restoration is at the forefront of applied hydrologic science. However, many river restoration projects are conducted with minimal scientific context. We propose two themes around which a research agenda to advance the scientific basis for river restoration can be built. First, because natural variability is an inherent feature of all river systems, we hypothesize that restoration of process is more likely to succeed than restoration aimed at a fixed end point. Second, because physical, chemical, and biological processes are interconnected in complex ways across watersheds and across timescales, we hypothesize that restoration projects are more likely to be successful in achieving goals if undertaken in the context of entire watersheds. To achieve restoration objectives, the science of river restoration must include (1) an explicit recognition of the known complexities and uncertainties, (2) continued development of a theoretical framework that enables us to identify generalities among river systems and to ask relevant questions, (3) enhancing the science and use of restoration monitoring by measuring the most effective set of variables at the correct scales of measurement, (4) linking science and implementation, and (5) developing methods of restoration that are effective within existing constraints. Key limitations to river restoration include a lack of scientific knowledge of watershed-scale process dynamics, institutional structures that are poorly suited to large-scale adaptive management, and a lack of political support to reestablish delivery of the ecosystem amenities lost through river degradation. This paper outlines an approach for addressing these shortcomings

    AB - River restoration is at the forefront of applied hydrologic science. However, many river restoration projects are conducted with minimal scientific context. We propose two themes around which a research agenda to advance the scientific basis for river restoration can be built. First, because natural variability is an inherent feature of all river systems, we hypothesize that restoration of process is more likely to succeed than restoration aimed at a fixed end point. Second, because physical, chemical, and biological processes are interconnected in complex ways across watersheds and across timescales, we hypothesize that restoration projects are more likely to be successful in achieving goals if undertaken in the context of entire watersheds. To achieve restoration objectives, the science of river restoration must include (1) an explicit recognition of the known complexities and uncertainties, (2) continued development of a theoretical framework that enables us to identify generalities among river systems and to ask relevant questions, (3) enhancing the science and use of restoration monitoring by measuring the most effective set of variables at the correct scales of measurement, (4) linking science and implementation, and (5) developing methods of restoration that are effective within existing constraints. Key limitations to river restoration include a lack of scientific knowledge of watershed-scale process dynamics, institutional structures that are poorly suited to large-scale adaptive management, and a lack of political support to reestablish delivery of the ecosystem amenities lost through river degradation. This paper outlines an approach for addressing these shortcomings

    U2 - 10.1029/2005WR003985

    DO - 10.1029/2005WR003985

    M3 - Article

    VL - 41

    SP - W10301-1-W10301-12

    JO - Water Resources Research

    JF - Water Resources Research

    SN - 0043-1397

    IS - 10

    ER -

    Wohl E, Angermeier PL, Bledsoe BP, Kondolf GM, MacDonnell L, Merritt DM et al. River restoration. Water Resources Research. 2005;41(10):W10301-1-W10301-12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003985