Roadmap for developing a national quality indicator set for general practice

Ailís Riain, Catherine Vahey, Conor Kennedy, Stephen Campbell, Claire Collins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a national, comprehensive quality indicator set to support delivering high-quality clinical care in Irish general practice.

Design/methodology/approach – Potential general practice quality indicators were identified through a literature review. A modified two-stage Delphi process was used to rationalise international indicators into an indicator set, involving both experts from key stakeholder groups (general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses, practice managers, patient and health policy representatives) and predominantly randomly selected GPs. An illustrative evaluation approach was used to road test the indicator set and supporting materials.

Findings – In total, 80 panellists completed the two Delphi rounds and staff in 13 volunteer practices participated in the road test. The original 171 indicators was reduced to 147 during the Delphi process and further reduced to 68 indicators during the road test. The indicators were set out in 14 sub-domains across three areas (practice infrastructure, practice processes and procedures, and practice staff). Practice staff planned 77 quality improvement activities after their assessment against the indicators and 31 (40 per cent) were completed with 44 (57 per cent) ongoing and two (3 per cent) not advanced after a six-month road test. A General Practice Indicators of Quality indicator set and support materials were produced at the conclusion.

Practical implications – It is important and relatively easy to customise existing quality indicators to a particular setting. The development process can be used to raise awareness, build capacity and drive quality improvement activity in general practices.

Originality/value – The authors describe in detail a method to develop general practice quality indicators for a regional or national population from existing validated indicators using consensus, action research and an illuminative evaluation
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)382-393
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

General Practice
Quality Improvement
General Practitioners
Quality of Health Care
Health Services Research
Health Policy
Volunteers
Nurses
Population

Cite this

Riain, Ailís ; Vahey, Catherine ; Kennedy, Conor ; Campbell, Stephen ; Collins, Claire. / Roadmap for developing a national quality indicator set for general practice. In: International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2015 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 382-393.
@article{4b1c83c36c57493bb116222c42cae5b1,
title = "Roadmap for developing a national quality indicator set for general practice",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a national, comprehensive quality indicator set to support delivering high-quality clinical care in Irish general practice.Design/methodology/approach – Potential general practice quality indicators were identified through a literature review. A modified two-stage Delphi process was used to rationalise international indicators into an indicator set, involving both experts from key stakeholder groups (general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses, practice managers, patient and health policy representatives) and predominantly randomly selected GPs. An illustrative evaluation approach was used to road test the indicator set and supporting materials.Findings – In total, 80 panellists completed the two Delphi rounds and staff in 13 volunteer practices participated in the road test. The original 171 indicators was reduced to 147 during the Delphi process and further reduced to 68 indicators during the road test. The indicators were set out in 14 sub-domains across three areas (practice infrastructure, practice processes and procedures, and practice staff). Practice staff planned 77 quality improvement activities after their assessment against the indicators and 31 (40 per cent) were completed with 44 (57 per cent) ongoing and two (3 per cent) not advanced after a six-month road test. A General Practice Indicators of Quality indicator set and support materials were produced at the conclusion.Practical implications – It is important and relatively easy to customise existing quality indicators to a particular setting. The development process can be used to raise awareness, build capacity and drive quality improvement activity in general practices.Originality/value – The authors describe in detail a method to develop general practice quality indicators for a regional or national population from existing validated indicators using consensus, action research and an illuminative evaluation",
author = "Ail{\'i}s Riain and Catherine Vahey and Conor Kennedy and Stephen Campbell and Claire Collins",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2014-0091",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "382--393",
journal = "International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance",
issn = "0952-6862",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Roadmap for developing a national quality indicator set for general practice. / Riain, Ailís; Vahey, Catherine; Kennedy, Conor; Campbell, Stephen; Collins, Claire.

In: International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2015, p. 382-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Roadmap for developing a national quality indicator set for general practice

AU - Riain, Ailís

AU - Vahey, Catherine

AU - Kennedy, Conor

AU - Campbell, Stephen

AU - Collins, Claire

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a national, comprehensive quality indicator set to support delivering high-quality clinical care in Irish general practice.Design/methodology/approach – Potential general practice quality indicators were identified through a literature review. A modified two-stage Delphi process was used to rationalise international indicators into an indicator set, involving both experts from key stakeholder groups (general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses, practice managers, patient and health policy representatives) and predominantly randomly selected GPs. An illustrative evaluation approach was used to road test the indicator set and supporting materials.Findings – In total, 80 panellists completed the two Delphi rounds and staff in 13 volunteer practices participated in the road test. The original 171 indicators was reduced to 147 during the Delphi process and further reduced to 68 indicators during the road test. The indicators were set out in 14 sub-domains across three areas (practice infrastructure, practice processes and procedures, and practice staff). Practice staff planned 77 quality improvement activities after their assessment against the indicators and 31 (40 per cent) were completed with 44 (57 per cent) ongoing and two (3 per cent) not advanced after a six-month road test. A General Practice Indicators of Quality indicator set and support materials were produced at the conclusion.Practical implications – It is important and relatively easy to customise existing quality indicators to a particular setting. The development process can be used to raise awareness, build capacity and drive quality improvement activity in general practices.Originality/value – The authors describe in detail a method to develop general practice quality indicators for a regional or national population from existing validated indicators using consensus, action research and an illuminative evaluation

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a national, comprehensive quality indicator set to support delivering high-quality clinical care in Irish general practice.Design/methodology/approach – Potential general practice quality indicators were identified through a literature review. A modified two-stage Delphi process was used to rationalise international indicators into an indicator set, involving both experts from key stakeholder groups (general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses, practice managers, patient and health policy representatives) and predominantly randomly selected GPs. An illustrative evaluation approach was used to road test the indicator set and supporting materials.Findings – In total, 80 panellists completed the two Delphi rounds and staff in 13 volunteer practices participated in the road test. The original 171 indicators was reduced to 147 during the Delphi process and further reduced to 68 indicators during the road test. The indicators were set out in 14 sub-domains across three areas (practice infrastructure, practice processes and procedures, and practice staff). Practice staff planned 77 quality improvement activities after their assessment against the indicators and 31 (40 per cent) were completed with 44 (57 per cent) ongoing and two (3 per cent) not advanced after a six-month road test. A General Practice Indicators of Quality indicator set and support materials were produced at the conclusion.Practical implications – It is important and relatively easy to customise existing quality indicators to a particular setting. The development process can be used to raise awareness, build capacity and drive quality improvement activity in general practices.Originality/value – The authors describe in detail a method to develop general practice quality indicators for a regional or national population from existing validated indicators using consensus, action research and an illuminative evaluation

U2 - 10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2014-0091

DO - 10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2014-0091

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 382

EP - 393

JO - International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

JF - International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

SN - 0952-6862

IS - 4

ER -