TY - JOUR
T1 - Scaffolding students’ critical thinking
T2 - A process not an end game
AU - Gunawardena, Maya
AU - Wilson, Kate
N1 - Funding Information:
We kindly acknowledge the Rector’s Start up Grant at , UNSW Canberra for providing funding for this study.
Funding Information:
We kindly acknowledge the Rector's Start up Grant at, UNSW Canberrafor providing funding for this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Critical thinking (CT) is an integral learning outcome for almost all university courses, yet little is known about how teachers facilitate the learning of CT. The visibility of CT in university teaching is often obscure as it is not always specifically explained, observable and measurable: thus, teachers encounter numerous challenges in teaching and assessing students’ CT skills. Employing 20 interviews and analysing 15 assessment tasks, this study investigated Australian university teachers’ perceptions of CT and how they integrate CT into their pedagogies in four major disciplines (Business, History, Geography, Engineering). The data from all disciplines included in this study suggest that lecturers have clear understandings of CT and adopt targeted strategies in their teaching, yet they perceive that few students develop transferable CT skills. The reasons given for this perceived deficit in students’ adoption of CT are predominantly student-related factors such as students’ poor motivation, the misconception of learning goals, and students’ lack of preparedness for higher-order thinking. The paper argues that teachers perceive CT as ‘a product’ rather than a developmental process, and that this perception impacts on their approaches to teaching CT. Teachers can overcome this dilemma by developing a culture of thinking in the classroom by overtly scaffolding students’ development of CT, thus making the process much more visible for students.
AB - Critical thinking (CT) is an integral learning outcome for almost all university courses, yet little is known about how teachers facilitate the learning of CT. The visibility of CT in university teaching is often obscure as it is not always specifically explained, observable and measurable: thus, teachers encounter numerous challenges in teaching and assessing students’ CT skills. Employing 20 interviews and analysing 15 assessment tasks, this study investigated Australian university teachers’ perceptions of CT and how they integrate CT into their pedagogies in four major disciplines (Business, History, Geography, Engineering). The data from all disciplines included in this study suggest that lecturers have clear understandings of CT and adopt targeted strategies in their teaching, yet they perceive that few students develop transferable CT skills. The reasons given for this perceived deficit in students’ adoption of CT are predominantly student-related factors such as students’ poor motivation, the misconception of learning goals, and students’ lack of preparedness for higher-order thinking. The paper argues that teachers perceive CT as ‘a product’ rather than a developmental process, and that this perception impacts on their approaches to teaching CT. Teachers can overcome this dilemma by developing a culture of thinking in the classroom by overtly scaffolding students’ development of CT, thus making the process much more visible for students.
KW - Assessment
KW - Critical thinking
KW - Higher education
KW - Pedagogy
KW - Thinking routines
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106582279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100848
DO - 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100848
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85106582279
SN - 1871-1871
VL - 41
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - Thinking Skills and Creativity
JF - Thinking Skills and Creativity
M1 - 100848
ER -