Scaling foreign accent

Direct magnitude estimation versus interval scaling

M. Helen Southwood, James E. Flege

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scaling of degree of perceived foreign accent is common in studies of second language acquisition. Although interval scales are commonly used, it is not known whether accentedness is amenable to linear partitioning (i.e. described by a metathetic continuum) or whether accentedness is resistant to linear partitioning because it has degrees of magnitude or quantity (i.e. described by a prothetic continuum). This study determined if accentedness was a prothetic or metathetic continuum. Two groups of 10 native English listeners rated, in a self-paced experiment, degrees of perceived accent of native Italian speakers of English using both a seven-point equal-appearing interval scale and direct magnitude estimation (DME). DME scores were plotted against interval scores. This study found that accentedness (at least for Italian speakers) is amenable to linear partitioning. However, a wide dispersion of DME scores for '7' on the interval scale suggests a ceiling effect. A nine- or 11-point scale may better measure degree of perceived foreign accent. Individual listeners could reliably judge accentedness; however, inter-judge reliability was poor, possibly due to differences in listeners' internal standards of foreign accent or scaling artifact. Response biases occurred because foreign accent lacks a defined physical referent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-349
Number of pages15
JournalClinical Linguistics and Phonetics
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sodium Glutamate
scaling
listener
language acquisition
artifact
lack
Artifacts
experiment
trend
Language
Magnitude Estimation
Scaling
Foreign Accent
Group
Listeners

Cite this

Southwood, M. Helen ; Flege, James E. / Scaling foreign accent : Direct magnitude estimation versus interval scaling. In: Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. 1999 ; Vol. 13, No. 5. pp. 335-349.
@article{e4ff449bf12e464ab9f91dc35ca82289,
title = "Scaling foreign accent: Direct magnitude estimation versus interval scaling",
abstract = "Scaling of degree of perceived foreign accent is common in studies of second language acquisition. Although interval scales are commonly used, it is not known whether accentedness is amenable to linear partitioning (i.e. described by a metathetic continuum) or whether accentedness is resistant to linear partitioning because it has degrees of magnitude or quantity (i.e. described by a prothetic continuum). This study determined if accentedness was a prothetic or metathetic continuum. Two groups of 10 native English listeners rated, in a self-paced experiment, degrees of perceived accent of native Italian speakers of English using both a seven-point equal-appearing interval scale and direct magnitude estimation (DME). DME scores were plotted against interval scores. This study found that accentedness (at least for Italian speakers) is amenable to linear partitioning. However, a wide dispersion of DME scores for '7' on the interval scale suggests a ceiling effect. A nine- or 11-point scale may better measure degree of perceived foreign accent. Individual listeners could reliably judge accentedness; however, inter-judge reliability was poor, possibly due to differences in listeners' internal standards of foreign accent or scaling artifact. Response biases occurred because foreign accent lacks a defined physical referent.",
keywords = "Direct magnitude estimation, Foreign accent, Interval scales, Scaling",
author = "Southwood, {M. Helen} and Flege, {James E.}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1080/026992099299013",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "335--349",
journal = "Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics",
issn = "0269-9206",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "5",

}

Scaling foreign accent : Direct magnitude estimation versus interval scaling. / Southwood, M. Helen; Flege, James E.

In: Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, Vol. 13, No. 5, 1999, p. 335-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaling foreign accent

T2 - Direct magnitude estimation versus interval scaling

AU - Southwood, M. Helen

AU - Flege, James E.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Scaling of degree of perceived foreign accent is common in studies of second language acquisition. Although interval scales are commonly used, it is not known whether accentedness is amenable to linear partitioning (i.e. described by a metathetic continuum) or whether accentedness is resistant to linear partitioning because it has degrees of magnitude or quantity (i.e. described by a prothetic continuum). This study determined if accentedness was a prothetic or metathetic continuum. Two groups of 10 native English listeners rated, in a self-paced experiment, degrees of perceived accent of native Italian speakers of English using both a seven-point equal-appearing interval scale and direct magnitude estimation (DME). DME scores were plotted against interval scores. This study found that accentedness (at least for Italian speakers) is amenable to linear partitioning. However, a wide dispersion of DME scores for '7' on the interval scale suggests a ceiling effect. A nine- or 11-point scale may better measure degree of perceived foreign accent. Individual listeners could reliably judge accentedness; however, inter-judge reliability was poor, possibly due to differences in listeners' internal standards of foreign accent or scaling artifact. Response biases occurred because foreign accent lacks a defined physical referent.

AB - Scaling of degree of perceived foreign accent is common in studies of second language acquisition. Although interval scales are commonly used, it is not known whether accentedness is amenable to linear partitioning (i.e. described by a metathetic continuum) or whether accentedness is resistant to linear partitioning because it has degrees of magnitude or quantity (i.e. described by a prothetic continuum). This study determined if accentedness was a prothetic or metathetic continuum. Two groups of 10 native English listeners rated, in a self-paced experiment, degrees of perceived accent of native Italian speakers of English using both a seven-point equal-appearing interval scale and direct magnitude estimation (DME). DME scores were plotted against interval scores. This study found that accentedness (at least for Italian speakers) is amenable to linear partitioning. However, a wide dispersion of DME scores for '7' on the interval scale suggests a ceiling effect. A nine- or 11-point scale may better measure degree of perceived foreign accent. Individual listeners could reliably judge accentedness; however, inter-judge reliability was poor, possibly due to differences in listeners' internal standards of foreign accent or scaling artifact. Response biases occurred because foreign accent lacks a defined physical referent.

KW - Direct magnitude estimation

KW - Foreign accent

KW - Interval scales

KW - Scaling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032772668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/026992099299013

DO - 10.1080/026992099299013

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 335

EP - 349

JO - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

JF - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

SN - 0269-9206

IS - 5

ER -