TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening Job Applicants
T2 - The Impact of Physical Attractiveness and Application Quality
AU - Watkins, Lucy M.
AU - Johnston, Lucy
PY - 2000/6
Y1 - 2000/6
N2 - The present study investigated the impact of physical attractiveness and résumé quality on the evaluation of job applicants in the screening phase of the selection process. One hundred and eighty participants were asked to imagine they were a recruiting officer and to screen an application for the position of graduate trainee manager. Participants read a job advertisement and one of two versions of a curriculum vitae, which differed in quality. Attached to the front page of each curriculum vitae was a passport-sized head-and-shoulders photograph of either an average or an attractive female. A control condition with no attached photograph was also included. Participants judged the likelihood with which they would offer an interview to the applicant, the quality of the application, and the likely starting salary they would offer the applicant. Results indicated that attractiveness had no impact when the quality of the application was high but that attractiveness was an advantage when the application was mediocre. When the résumé quality was average the attractive applicant was evaluated more positively than the control, no photograph, applicant; an attractive photograph boosted the evaluation of a mediocre application. Results are discussed in terms of discrimination and implications for the field of human resource management.
AB - The present study investigated the impact of physical attractiveness and résumé quality on the evaluation of job applicants in the screening phase of the selection process. One hundred and eighty participants were asked to imagine they were a recruiting officer and to screen an application for the position of graduate trainee manager. Participants read a job advertisement and one of two versions of a curriculum vitae, which differed in quality. Attached to the front page of each curriculum vitae was a passport-sized head-and-shoulders photograph of either an average or an attractive female. A control condition with no attached photograph was also included. Participants judged the likelihood with which they would offer an interview to the applicant, the quality of the application, and the likely starting salary they would offer the applicant. Results indicated that attractiveness had no impact when the quality of the application was high but that attractiveness was an advantage when the application was mediocre. When the résumé quality was average the attractive applicant was evaluated more positively than the control, no photograph, applicant; an attractive photograph boosted the evaluation of a mediocre application. Results are discussed in terms of discrimination and implications for the field of human resource management.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034374507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1468-2389.00135
DO - 10.1111/1468-2389.00135
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0034374507
SN - 0965-075X
VL - 8
SP - 76
EP - 84
JO - International Journal of Selection and Assessment
JF - International Journal of Selection and Assessment
IS - 2
ER -