Second Elections and Democratic Consolidation: the Experience of Bhutan

Mark TURNER, Jit Tshering

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenon of the second election after democratization in developing countries. Unlike the euphoria that often accompanies the immediate post-democratization election, the second election gives clear evidence of the progress of democratic consolidation or whether the new regime has incorporated authoritarian elements and become a hybrid. To measure the democratic gains or losses that are seen in the second election, an analytical framework has been adopted comprised of three dimensions: regularity, openness and acceptability. This framework is applied to Bhutan where the second election took place in 2013. The findings are that progress was made on all three dimensions of democratization in the election although some democratic shortfalls were still evident. For Bhutan, the overarching concern for political stability is seen to have greatly affected the design and implementation of its electoral system.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-334
Number of pages20
JournalAsian Journal of Political Science
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Bhutan
consolidation
election
democratization
experience
political stability
electoral system
regularity
developing country
regime
evidence

Cite this

TURNER, Mark ; Tshering, Jit. / Second Elections and Democratic Consolidation: the Experience of Bhutan. In: Asian Journal of Political Science. 2014 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 315-334.
@article{d6c61b12461541e7ace5a83b52b3f019,
title = "Second Elections and Democratic Consolidation: the Experience of Bhutan",
abstract = "This article examines the phenomenon of the second election after democratization in developing countries. Unlike the euphoria that often accompanies the immediate post-democratization election, the second election gives clear evidence of the progress of democratic consolidation or whether the new regime has incorporated authoritarian elements and become a hybrid. To measure the democratic gains or losses that are seen in the second election, an analytical framework has been adopted comprised of three dimensions: regularity, openness and acceptability. This framework is applied to Bhutan where the second election took place in 2013. The findings are that progress was made on all three dimensions of democratization in the election although some democratic shortfalls were still evident. For Bhutan, the overarching concern for political stability is seen to have greatly affected the design and implementation of its electoral system.",
keywords = "Democratization, Elections, Second Elections, Bhutan, Developing Countries, Political Parties",
author = "Mark TURNER and Jit Tshering",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/02185377.2014.957708",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "315--334",
journal = "Asian Journal of Political Science",
issn = "1750-7812",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Second Elections and Democratic Consolidation: the Experience of Bhutan. / TURNER, Mark; Tshering, Jit.

In: Asian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2014, p. 315-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Second Elections and Democratic Consolidation: the Experience of Bhutan

AU - TURNER, Mark

AU - Tshering, Jit

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This article examines the phenomenon of the second election after democratization in developing countries. Unlike the euphoria that often accompanies the immediate post-democratization election, the second election gives clear evidence of the progress of democratic consolidation or whether the new regime has incorporated authoritarian elements and become a hybrid. To measure the democratic gains or losses that are seen in the second election, an analytical framework has been adopted comprised of three dimensions: regularity, openness and acceptability. This framework is applied to Bhutan where the second election took place in 2013. The findings are that progress was made on all three dimensions of democratization in the election although some democratic shortfalls were still evident. For Bhutan, the overarching concern for political stability is seen to have greatly affected the design and implementation of its electoral system.

AB - This article examines the phenomenon of the second election after democratization in developing countries. Unlike the euphoria that often accompanies the immediate post-democratization election, the second election gives clear evidence of the progress of democratic consolidation or whether the new regime has incorporated authoritarian elements and become a hybrid. To measure the democratic gains or losses that are seen in the second election, an analytical framework has been adopted comprised of three dimensions: regularity, openness and acceptability. This framework is applied to Bhutan where the second election took place in 2013. The findings are that progress was made on all three dimensions of democratization in the election although some democratic shortfalls were still evident. For Bhutan, the overarching concern for political stability is seen to have greatly affected the design and implementation of its electoral system.

KW - Democratization

KW - Elections

KW - Second Elections

KW - Bhutan

KW - Developing Countries

KW - Political Parties

U2 - 10.1080/02185377.2014.957708

DO - 10.1080/02185377.2014.957708

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 315

EP - 334

JO - Asian Journal of Political Science

JF - Asian Journal of Political Science

SN - 1750-7812

IS - 3

ER -