TY - JOUR
T1 - Second rate or a second chance? Assessing biomass and biodiversity recovery in regenerating Amazonian forests
AU - Lennox, Gareth D.
AU - Gardner, Toby A.
AU - Thomson, James R.
AU - Ferreira, Joice
AU - Berenguer, Erika
AU - Lees, Alexander C.
AU - Mac Nally, Ralph
AU - Aragão, Luiz E.O.C.
AU - Ferraz, Silvio F.B.
AU - Louzada, Julio
AU - Moura, Nárgila G.
AU - Oliveira, Victor H.F.
AU - Pardini, Renata
AU - Solar, Ricardo R.C.
AU - Vaz-de Mello, Fernando Z.
AU - Vieira, Ima C.G.
AU - Barlow, Jos
N1 - Funding Information:
We are deeply grateful to the landowners of PGM and STM who made our work possible by allowing us to assess ecological conditions on their properties, as well as to the numerous field and laboratory assistants who contributed to data collection and processing. We also thank four anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from Brazil (CNPq 574008/2008-0, 458022/2013-6, and 400640/2012-0; Embrapa SEG:02.08.06.005.00; The Nature Conservancy—Brasil; CAPES scholarships) the UK (Darwin Initiative 17-023; NE/F01614X/1; NE/G000816/1; NE/ F015356/2; NE/l018123/1; NE/K016431/1; NE/N01250X/1; and H2020-MSCA-RISE-2015 [Project 691053-ODYSSEA]), Formas 2013-1571, and Australian Research Council grant DP120100797. J.F., R.P. and F.Z.V.M. acknowledge CNP productivity scholarships (process numbers, respectively: 307788/ 2017-2, 308205/2014-6 and 306745/2016-0). Institutional support was provided by the Herbário IAN in Belém, LBA in Santarém and FAPEMAT. This is paper no. 66 in the Sustainable Amazon Network series.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Secondary forests (SFs) regenerating on previously deforested land account for large, expanding areas of tropical forest cover. Given that tropical forests rank among Earth’s most important reservoirs of carbon and biodiversity, SFs play an increasingly pivotal role in the carbon cycle and as potential habitat for forest biota. Nevertheless, their capacity to regain the biotic attributes of undisturbed primary forests (UPFs) remains poorly understood. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of SF recovery, using extensive tropical biodiversity, biomass, and environmental datasets. These data, collected in 59 naturally regenerating SFs and 30 co-located UPFs in the eastern Amazon, cover >1,600 large- and small-stemmed plant, bird, and dung beetles species and a suite of forest structure, landscape context, and topoedaphic predictors. After up to 40 years of regeneration, the SFs we surveyed showed a high degree of biodiversity resilience, recovering, on average among taxa, 88% and 85% mean UPF species richness and composition, respectively. Across the first 20 years of succession, the period for which we have accurate SF age data, biomass recovered at 1.2% per year, equivalent to a carbon uptake rate of 2.25 Mg/ha per year, while, on average, species richness and composition recovered at 2.6% and 2.3% per year, respectively. For all taxonomic groups, biomass was strongly associated with SF species distributions. However, other variables describing habitat complexity—canopy cover and understory stem density—were equally important occurrence predictors for most taxa. Species responses to biomass revealed a successional transition at approximately 75 Mg/ha, marking the influx of high-conservation-value forest species. Overall, our results show that naturally regenerating SFs can accumulate substantial amounts of carbon and support many forest species. However, given that the surveyed SFs failed to return to a typical UPF state, SFs are not substitutes for UPFs.
AB - Secondary forests (SFs) regenerating on previously deforested land account for large, expanding areas of tropical forest cover. Given that tropical forests rank among Earth’s most important reservoirs of carbon and biodiversity, SFs play an increasingly pivotal role in the carbon cycle and as potential habitat for forest biota. Nevertheless, their capacity to regain the biotic attributes of undisturbed primary forests (UPFs) remains poorly understood. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of SF recovery, using extensive tropical biodiversity, biomass, and environmental datasets. These data, collected in 59 naturally regenerating SFs and 30 co-located UPFs in the eastern Amazon, cover >1,600 large- and small-stemmed plant, bird, and dung beetles species and a suite of forest structure, landscape context, and topoedaphic predictors. After up to 40 years of regeneration, the SFs we surveyed showed a high degree of biodiversity resilience, recovering, on average among taxa, 88% and 85% mean UPF species richness and composition, respectively. Across the first 20 years of succession, the period for which we have accurate SF age data, biomass recovered at 1.2% per year, equivalent to a carbon uptake rate of 2.25 Mg/ha per year, while, on average, species richness and composition recovered at 2.6% and 2.3% per year, respectively. For all taxonomic groups, biomass was strongly associated with SF species distributions. However, other variables describing habitat complexity—canopy cover and understory stem density—were equally important occurrence predictors for most taxa. Species responses to biomass revealed a successional transition at approximately 75 Mg/ha, marking the influx of high-conservation-value forest species. Overall, our results show that naturally regenerating SFs can accumulate substantial amounts of carbon and support many forest species. However, given that the surveyed SFs failed to return to a typical UPF state, SFs are not substitutes for UPFs.
KW - Amazon
KW - biodiversity
KW - biomass
KW - carbon
KW - forest succession
KW - secondary forests
KW - species composition
KW - species richness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054333352&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/second-rate-second-chance-assessing-biomass-biodiversity-recovery-regenerating-amazonian-forests-1
U2 - 10.1111/gcb.14443
DO - 10.1111/gcb.14443
M3 - Article
C2 - 30216600
AN - SCOPUS:85054333352
SN - 1354-1013
VL - 24
SP - 5680
EP - 5694
JO - Global Change Biology
JF - Global Change Biology
IS - 12
ER -