Secondary Invasions: Implications of Riparian Restoration for In-Stream Invasion by an Aquatic Grass

Sarina E. Loo, Ralph MAC NALLY, Dennis O’Dowd, P. Lake

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    31 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The complex nature of ecosystems with multiple invaders requires whole-system approaches to ecosystem management. Undesirable, unintended secondary effects may occur if interspecific interactions are ignored. Although degraded riparian zones urgently need effective restoration, broad-scale removal of introduced tree species (e.g., willows [Salix spp.]) and fencing of riparian zones to exclude livestock may facilitate spread of the invasive aquatic grass Glyceria maxima in southeastern Australia. We recorded occurrence of the grass at riparian sites with different amounts of woody vegetation, including willows, and monitored spread for 2 years in locations with and without livestock. Glyceria maxima occurred more frequently at sites with little or no woody riparian vegetation. Larger, older patches fenced from livestock spread fastest. Analyses of costs of controlling G. maxima with herbicide showed that it is more cost-effective to eradicate small patches than large patches if locations are known. However, the cost per m2 reduction in patch size is cheaper for larger patches. We recommend that small, young patches should be eradicated as soon as detected and show that spread of large source patches can be controlled effectively with continued spraying over several years. If restoration of waterways is to succeed, riparian management strategies must recognize connectivity between riparian and freshwater habitats.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)378-385
    Number of pages8
    JournalRestoration Ecology
    Volume17
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Glyceria maxima
    riparian areas
    livestock
    riparian zone
    grass
    grasses
    cost
    vegetation
    interspecific interaction
    waterways
    ecosystem management
    riparian vegetation
    patch size
    Salix
    spraying
    connectivity
    herbicide
    herbicides
    ecosystems
    ecosystem

    Cite this

    @article{4eecbdb38dfc40db86408e54e0179f7f,
    title = "Secondary Invasions: Implications of Riparian Restoration for In-Stream Invasion by an Aquatic Grass",
    abstract = "The complex nature of ecosystems with multiple invaders requires whole-system approaches to ecosystem management. Undesirable, unintended secondary effects may occur if interspecific interactions are ignored. Although degraded riparian zones urgently need effective restoration, broad-scale removal of introduced tree species (e.g., willows [Salix spp.]) and fencing of riparian zones to exclude livestock may facilitate spread of the invasive aquatic grass Glyceria maxima in southeastern Australia. We recorded occurrence of the grass at riparian sites with different amounts of woody vegetation, including willows, and monitored spread for 2 years in locations with and without livestock. Glyceria maxima occurred more frequently at sites with little or no woody riparian vegetation. Larger, older patches fenced from livestock spread fastest. Analyses of costs of controlling G. maxima with herbicide showed that it is more cost-effective to eradicate small patches than large patches if locations are known. However, the cost per m2 reduction in patch size is cheaper for larger patches. We recommend that small, young patches should be eradicated as soon as detected and show that spread of large source patches can be controlled effectively with continued spraying over several years. If restoration of waterways is to succeed, riparian management strategies must recognize connectivity between riparian and freshwater habitats.",
    keywords = "aquatic weeds, biological invasion, Glyceria maxima, interspecies interactions, riparian management.",
    author = "Loo, {Sarina E.} and {MAC NALLY}, Ralph and Dennis O’Dowd and P. Lake",
    year = "2009",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00378.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "378--385",
    journal = "Restoration Ecology",
    issn = "1061-2971",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "3",

    }

    Secondary Invasions: Implications of Riparian Restoration for In-Stream Invasion by an Aquatic Grass. / Loo, Sarina E.; MAC NALLY, Ralph; O’Dowd, Dennis; Lake, P.

    In: Restoration Ecology, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2009, p. 378-385.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Secondary Invasions: Implications of Riparian Restoration for In-Stream Invasion by an Aquatic Grass

    AU - Loo, Sarina E.

    AU - MAC NALLY, Ralph

    AU - O’Dowd, Dennis

    AU - Lake, P.

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - The complex nature of ecosystems with multiple invaders requires whole-system approaches to ecosystem management. Undesirable, unintended secondary effects may occur if interspecific interactions are ignored. Although degraded riparian zones urgently need effective restoration, broad-scale removal of introduced tree species (e.g., willows [Salix spp.]) and fencing of riparian zones to exclude livestock may facilitate spread of the invasive aquatic grass Glyceria maxima in southeastern Australia. We recorded occurrence of the grass at riparian sites with different amounts of woody vegetation, including willows, and monitored spread for 2 years in locations with and without livestock. Glyceria maxima occurred more frequently at sites with little or no woody riparian vegetation. Larger, older patches fenced from livestock spread fastest. Analyses of costs of controlling G. maxima with herbicide showed that it is more cost-effective to eradicate small patches than large patches if locations are known. However, the cost per m2 reduction in patch size is cheaper for larger patches. We recommend that small, young patches should be eradicated as soon as detected and show that spread of large source patches can be controlled effectively with continued spraying over several years. If restoration of waterways is to succeed, riparian management strategies must recognize connectivity between riparian and freshwater habitats.

    AB - The complex nature of ecosystems with multiple invaders requires whole-system approaches to ecosystem management. Undesirable, unintended secondary effects may occur if interspecific interactions are ignored. Although degraded riparian zones urgently need effective restoration, broad-scale removal of introduced tree species (e.g., willows [Salix spp.]) and fencing of riparian zones to exclude livestock may facilitate spread of the invasive aquatic grass Glyceria maxima in southeastern Australia. We recorded occurrence of the grass at riparian sites with different amounts of woody vegetation, including willows, and monitored spread for 2 years in locations with and without livestock. Glyceria maxima occurred more frequently at sites with little or no woody riparian vegetation. Larger, older patches fenced from livestock spread fastest. Analyses of costs of controlling G. maxima with herbicide showed that it is more cost-effective to eradicate small patches than large patches if locations are known. However, the cost per m2 reduction in patch size is cheaper for larger patches. We recommend that small, young patches should be eradicated as soon as detected and show that spread of large source patches can be controlled effectively with continued spraying over several years. If restoration of waterways is to succeed, riparian management strategies must recognize connectivity between riparian and freshwater habitats.

    KW - aquatic weeds

    KW - biological invasion

    KW - Glyceria maxima

    KW - interspecies interactions

    KW - riparian management.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00378.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00378.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 17

    SP - 378

    EP - 385

    JO - Restoration Ecology

    JF - Restoration Ecology

    SN - 1061-2971

    IS - 3

    ER -