Shared Services: Is It Not Time for Some Clarity?

Richard REID, Roger Wettenhall

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    As a result of the 2014 National Commission of Audit, shared services began to receive increasing attention amongst those involved with Australian public administration. However, little seems to be known about the term and its theoretical origins. In addition to this lack of understanding of what is meant by shared services, the term was also linked with another perennial in public administration: the one-stop shop. The two terms are often confused and the difference between them little understood. This article seeks to provide some clarity to this discussion over shared services and one-stop shops through both an exploration of the evolution of the terms and through a consideration of a variety of Australian case studies. We conclude that the two terms mean very different things and have very different theoretical underpinnings. We also conclude that these concepts are often employed for purely political considerations, and are employed inconsistently with government rhetoric.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)102-114
    Number of pages13
    JournalAsia-Pacific Journal of Public Administration
    Volume37
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    public administration
    audit
    lack
    time

    Cite this

    REID, Richard ; Wettenhall, Roger. / Shared Services: Is It Not Time for Some Clarity?. In: Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Administration. 2015 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 102-114.
    @article{109330e8812845a79b0a1d8a1d325d05,
    title = "Shared Services: Is It Not Time for Some Clarity?",
    abstract = "As a result of the 2014 National Commission of Audit, shared services began to receive increasing attention amongst those involved with Australian public administration. However, little seems to be known about the term and its theoretical origins. In addition to this lack of understanding of what is meant by shared services, the term was also linked with another perennial in public administration: the one-stop shop. The two terms are often confused and the difference between them little understood. This article seeks to provide some clarity to this discussion over shared services and one-stop shops through both an exploration of the evolution of the terms and through a consideration of a variety of Australian case studies. We conclude that the two terms mean very different things and have very different theoretical underpinnings. We also conclude that these concepts are often employed for purely political considerations, and are employed inconsistently with government rhetoric.",
    keywords = "shared services, one-stop shops, National Commission of Audit, Australia",
    author = "Richard REID and Roger Wettenhall",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1080/23276665.2015.1041221",
    language = "English",
    volume = "37",
    pages = "102--114",
    journal = "Asian Pacific Journal of Public Administration",
    issn = "0259-8272",
    number = "2",

    }

    Shared Services: Is It Not Time for Some Clarity? / REID, Richard; Wettenhall, Roger.

    In: Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2015, p. 102-114.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Shared Services: Is It Not Time for Some Clarity?

    AU - REID, Richard

    AU - Wettenhall, Roger

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - As a result of the 2014 National Commission of Audit, shared services began to receive increasing attention amongst those involved with Australian public administration. However, little seems to be known about the term and its theoretical origins. In addition to this lack of understanding of what is meant by shared services, the term was also linked with another perennial in public administration: the one-stop shop. The two terms are often confused and the difference between them little understood. This article seeks to provide some clarity to this discussion over shared services and one-stop shops through both an exploration of the evolution of the terms and through a consideration of a variety of Australian case studies. We conclude that the two terms mean very different things and have very different theoretical underpinnings. We also conclude that these concepts are often employed for purely political considerations, and are employed inconsistently with government rhetoric.

    AB - As a result of the 2014 National Commission of Audit, shared services began to receive increasing attention amongst those involved with Australian public administration. However, little seems to be known about the term and its theoretical origins. In addition to this lack of understanding of what is meant by shared services, the term was also linked with another perennial in public administration: the one-stop shop. The two terms are often confused and the difference between them little understood. This article seeks to provide some clarity to this discussion over shared services and one-stop shops through both an exploration of the evolution of the terms and through a consideration of a variety of Australian case studies. We conclude that the two terms mean very different things and have very different theoretical underpinnings. We also conclude that these concepts are often employed for purely political considerations, and are employed inconsistently with government rhetoric.

    KW - shared services

    KW - one-stop shops

    KW - National Commission of Audit

    KW - Australia

    U2 - 10.1080/23276665.2015.1041221

    DO - 10.1080/23276665.2015.1041221

    M3 - Article

    VL - 37

    SP - 102

    EP - 114

    JO - Asian Pacific Journal of Public Administration

    JF - Asian Pacific Journal of Public Administration

    SN - 0259-8272

    IS - 2

    ER -