Should axis deviation or atrial enlargement be categorised as abnormal in young athletes? the athlete's electrocardiogram

Time for re-appraisal of markers of pathology

Sabiha Gati, Nabeel Sheikh, Saqib Ghani, Abbas Zaidi, Mathew Wilson, Hariharan Raju, Andrew T. Cox, Matt Reed, Michael Papadakis, Sanjay Sharma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AimsThe 2010 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation in athletes are associated with a relatively high false positive rate and warrant modification to improve the specificity without compromising sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether non-specific anomalies such as axis deviation and atrial enlargement in isolation require further assessment in highly trained young athletes.Method and resultsBetween 2003 and 2011, 2533 athletes aged 14-35 years were investigated with 12-lead ECG and echocardiography. Electrocardiograms were analysed for non-training-related (Group 2) changes according to the 2010 ESC guidelines. Results were compared with 9997 asymptomatic controls. Of the 2533 athletes, 329 (13%) showed Group 2 ECG changes. Isolated axis deviation and isolated atrial enlargement comprised 42.6% of all Group 2 changes. Athletes revealed a slightly higher prevalence of these anomalies compared with controls (5.5 vs. 4.4%; P = 0.023). Echocardiographic evaluation of athletes and controls with isolated axis deviation or atrial enlargement (n = 579) failed to identify any major structural or functional abnormalities. Exclusion of axis deviation or atrial enlargement reduced the false positive rate from 13 to 7.5% and improved specificity from 90 to 94% with a minimal reduction in sensitivity (91-89.5%).ConclusionIsolated axis deviation and atrial enlargement comprise a high burden of Group 2 changes in athletes and do not predict underlying structural cardiac disease. Exclusion of these anomalies from current ESC guidelines would improve specificity and cost-effectiveness of pre-participation screening with ECG.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3641-3648
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume34
Issue number47
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Athletes
Electrocardiography
Pathology
Guidelines
Cardiology
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Echocardiography
Heart Diseases

Cite this

Gati, Sabiha ; Sheikh, Nabeel ; Ghani, Saqib ; Zaidi, Abbas ; Wilson, Mathew ; Raju, Hariharan ; Cox, Andrew T. ; Reed, Matt ; Papadakis, Michael ; Sharma, Sanjay. / Should axis deviation or atrial enlargement be categorised as abnormal in young athletes? the athlete's electrocardiogram : Time for re-appraisal of markers of pathology. In: European Heart Journal. 2013 ; Vol. 34, No. 47. pp. 3641-3648.
@article{8dd595ce3b604464a3508baeec51b9c9,
title = "Should axis deviation or atrial enlargement be categorised as abnormal in young athletes? the athlete's electrocardiogram: Time for re-appraisal of markers of pathology",
abstract = "AimsThe 2010 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation in athletes are associated with a relatively high false positive rate and warrant modification to improve the specificity without compromising sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether non-specific anomalies such as axis deviation and atrial enlargement in isolation require further assessment in highly trained young athletes.Method and resultsBetween 2003 and 2011, 2533 athletes aged 14-35 years were investigated with 12-lead ECG and echocardiography. Electrocardiograms were analysed for non-training-related (Group 2) changes according to the 2010 ESC guidelines. Results were compared with 9997 asymptomatic controls. Of the 2533 athletes, 329 (13{\%}) showed Group 2 ECG changes. Isolated axis deviation and isolated atrial enlargement comprised 42.6{\%} of all Group 2 changes. Athletes revealed a slightly higher prevalence of these anomalies compared with controls (5.5 vs. 4.4{\%}; P = 0.023). Echocardiographic evaluation of athletes and controls with isolated axis deviation or atrial enlargement (n = 579) failed to identify any major structural or functional abnormalities. Exclusion of axis deviation or atrial enlargement reduced the false positive rate from 13 to 7.5{\%} and improved specificity from 90 to 94{\%} with a minimal reduction in sensitivity (91-89.5{\%}).ConclusionIsolated axis deviation and atrial enlargement comprise a high burden of Group 2 changes in athletes and do not predict underlying structural cardiac disease. Exclusion of these anomalies from current ESC guidelines would improve specificity and cost-effectiveness of pre-participation screening with ECG.",
keywords = "Athlete's Heart, Electrocardiogram, Pre-participation screening",
author = "Sabiha Gati and Nabeel Sheikh and Saqib Ghani and Abbas Zaidi and Mathew Wilson and Hariharan Raju and Cox, {Andrew T.} and Matt Reed and Michael Papadakis and Sanjay Sharma",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1093/eurheartj/eht390",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "3641--3648",
journal = "European Heart Journal",
issn = "0195-668X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "47",

}

Should axis deviation or atrial enlargement be categorised as abnormal in young athletes? the athlete's electrocardiogram : Time for re-appraisal of markers of pathology. / Gati, Sabiha; Sheikh, Nabeel; Ghani, Saqib; Zaidi, Abbas; Wilson, Mathew; Raju, Hariharan; Cox, Andrew T.; Reed, Matt; Papadakis, Michael; Sharma, Sanjay.

In: European Heart Journal, Vol. 34, No. 47, 14.12.2013, p. 3641-3648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should axis deviation or atrial enlargement be categorised as abnormal in young athletes? the athlete's electrocardiogram

T2 - Time for re-appraisal of markers of pathology

AU - Gati, Sabiha

AU - Sheikh, Nabeel

AU - Ghani, Saqib

AU - Zaidi, Abbas

AU - Wilson, Mathew

AU - Raju, Hariharan

AU - Cox, Andrew T.

AU - Reed, Matt

AU - Papadakis, Michael

AU - Sharma, Sanjay

PY - 2013/12/14

Y1 - 2013/12/14

N2 - AimsThe 2010 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation in athletes are associated with a relatively high false positive rate and warrant modification to improve the specificity without compromising sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether non-specific anomalies such as axis deviation and atrial enlargement in isolation require further assessment in highly trained young athletes.Method and resultsBetween 2003 and 2011, 2533 athletes aged 14-35 years were investigated with 12-lead ECG and echocardiography. Electrocardiograms were analysed for non-training-related (Group 2) changes according to the 2010 ESC guidelines. Results were compared with 9997 asymptomatic controls. Of the 2533 athletes, 329 (13%) showed Group 2 ECG changes. Isolated axis deviation and isolated atrial enlargement comprised 42.6% of all Group 2 changes. Athletes revealed a slightly higher prevalence of these anomalies compared with controls (5.5 vs. 4.4%; P = 0.023). Echocardiographic evaluation of athletes and controls with isolated axis deviation or atrial enlargement (n = 579) failed to identify any major structural or functional abnormalities. Exclusion of axis deviation or atrial enlargement reduced the false positive rate from 13 to 7.5% and improved specificity from 90 to 94% with a minimal reduction in sensitivity (91-89.5%).ConclusionIsolated axis deviation and atrial enlargement comprise a high burden of Group 2 changes in athletes and do not predict underlying structural cardiac disease. Exclusion of these anomalies from current ESC guidelines would improve specificity and cost-effectiveness of pre-participation screening with ECG.

AB - AimsThe 2010 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation in athletes are associated with a relatively high false positive rate and warrant modification to improve the specificity without compromising sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether non-specific anomalies such as axis deviation and atrial enlargement in isolation require further assessment in highly trained young athletes.Method and resultsBetween 2003 and 2011, 2533 athletes aged 14-35 years were investigated with 12-lead ECG and echocardiography. Electrocardiograms were analysed for non-training-related (Group 2) changes according to the 2010 ESC guidelines. Results were compared with 9997 asymptomatic controls. Of the 2533 athletes, 329 (13%) showed Group 2 ECG changes. Isolated axis deviation and isolated atrial enlargement comprised 42.6% of all Group 2 changes. Athletes revealed a slightly higher prevalence of these anomalies compared with controls (5.5 vs. 4.4%; P = 0.023). Echocardiographic evaluation of athletes and controls with isolated axis deviation or atrial enlargement (n = 579) failed to identify any major structural or functional abnormalities. Exclusion of axis deviation or atrial enlargement reduced the false positive rate from 13 to 7.5% and improved specificity from 90 to 94% with a minimal reduction in sensitivity (91-89.5%).ConclusionIsolated axis deviation and atrial enlargement comprise a high burden of Group 2 changes in athletes and do not predict underlying structural cardiac disease. Exclusion of these anomalies from current ESC guidelines would improve specificity and cost-effectiveness of pre-participation screening with ECG.

KW - Athlete's Heart

KW - Electrocardiogram

KW - Pre-participation screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891366506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/eht390

DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/eht390

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 3641

EP - 3648

JO - European Heart Journal

JF - European Heart Journal

SN - 0195-668X

IS - 47

ER -