SMART or CUTE - What makes a good target?

Peter Bridgewater

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Is a target a goal? What is an indicator? Targets, or goals, are the desired outcomes of a policy framework; they show where we want to be and represent the successful implementation of policy. To get there, a mission is needed, but all too often this is confused with targets, goals and vision. Good targets need good indicators to measure success along the way. However, indicators are often left aside from target setting, a self-defeating strategy and one regrettably followed by the Convention on Biological Diversity in 2002 and again in 2010 in setting global targets for reducing the rate of loss of biodiversity. Embracing a highly aspirational target (i.e. reduce the rate of loss of biodiversity by 2010) is easy, but measuring the success of that target is the tricky bit! SMART targets are well known, but CUTE targets (Comprehensive, Understandable, Time-bound and Enabling) can be more effective in public policy setting. Often in public policy, the focus is all on process and outputs, and all too rarely on outcomes. Targets can capitalize on the input from policy, but must be informed by potential indicators from the outset and, in the end, must also enable policy delivery and refreshed outcomes, a critical failing of the 2010 target.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)240-249
    Number of pages10
    JournalBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society
    Volume166
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2011

    Fingerprint

    public policy
    biodiversity
    policy
    indicator
    loss
    rate
    public

    Cite this

    Bridgewater, Peter. / SMART or CUTE - What makes a good target?. In: Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2011 ; Vol. 166, No. 3. pp. 240-249.
    @article{cd81feeb888f498091a2861c16beade5,
    title = "SMART or CUTE - What makes a good target?",
    abstract = "Is a target a goal? What is an indicator? Targets, or goals, are the desired outcomes of a policy framework; they show where we want to be and represent the successful implementation of policy. To get there, a mission is needed, but all too often this is confused with targets, goals and vision. Good targets need good indicators to measure success along the way. However, indicators are often left aside from target setting, a self-defeating strategy and one regrettably followed by the Convention on Biological Diversity in 2002 and again in 2010 in setting global targets for reducing the rate of loss of biodiversity. Embracing a highly aspirational target (i.e. reduce the rate of loss of biodiversity by 2010) is easy, but measuring the success of that target is the tricky bit! SMART targets are well known, but CUTE targets (Comprehensive, Understandable, Time-bound and Enabling) can be more effective in public policy setting. Often in public policy, the focus is all on process and outputs, and all too rarely on outcomes. Targets can capitalize on the input from policy, but must be informed by potential indicators from the outset and, in the end, must also enable policy delivery and refreshed outcomes, a critical failing of the 2010 target.",
    keywords = "2010 target, Goals, GSPC, Indicators, Objectives",
    author = "Peter Bridgewater",
    year = "2011",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01149.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "166",
    pages = "240--249",
    journal = "Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society",
    issn = "0024-4074",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "3",

    }

    SMART or CUTE - What makes a good target? / Bridgewater, Peter.

    In: Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 166, No. 3, 01.07.2011, p. 240-249.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - SMART or CUTE - What makes a good target?

    AU - Bridgewater, Peter

    PY - 2011/7/1

    Y1 - 2011/7/1

    N2 - Is a target a goal? What is an indicator? Targets, or goals, are the desired outcomes of a policy framework; they show where we want to be and represent the successful implementation of policy. To get there, a mission is needed, but all too often this is confused with targets, goals and vision. Good targets need good indicators to measure success along the way. However, indicators are often left aside from target setting, a self-defeating strategy and one regrettably followed by the Convention on Biological Diversity in 2002 and again in 2010 in setting global targets for reducing the rate of loss of biodiversity. Embracing a highly aspirational target (i.e. reduce the rate of loss of biodiversity by 2010) is easy, but measuring the success of that target is the tricky bit! SMART targets are well known, but CUTE targets (Comprehensive, Understandable, Time-bound and Enabling) can be more effective in public policy setting. Often in public policy, the focus is all on process and outputs, and all too rarely on outcomes. Targets can capitalize on the input from policy, but must be informed by potential indicators from the outset and, in the end, must also enable policy delivery and refreshed outcomes, a critical failing of the 2010 target.

    AB - Is a target a goal? What is an indicator? Targets, or goals, are the desired outcomes of a policy framework; they show where we want to be and represent the successful implementation of policy. To get there, a mission is needed, but all too often this is confused with targets, goals and vision. Good targets need good indicators to measure success along the way. However, indicators are often left aside from target setting, a self-defeating strategy and one regrettably followed by the Convention on Biological Diversity in 2002 and again in 2010 in setting global targets for reducing the rate of loss of biodiversity. Embracing a highly aspirational target (i.e. reduce the rate of loss of biodiversity by 2010) is easy, but measuring the success of that target is the tricky bit! SMART targets are well known, but CUTE targets (Comprehensive, Understandable, Time-bound and Enabling) can be more effective in public policy setting. Often in public policy, the focus is all on process and outputs, and all too rarely on outcomes. Targets can capitalize on the input from policy, but must be informed by potential indicators from the outset and, in the end, must also enable policy delivery and refreshed outcomes, a critical failing of the 2010 target.

    KW - 2010 target

    KW - Goals

    KW - GSPC

    KW - Indicators

    KW - Objectives

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959557649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01149.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01149.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 166

    SP - 240

    EP - 249

    JO - Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

    JF - Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

    SN - 0024-4074

    IS - 3

    ER -