Social Creativity in Olympic Medal Counts: Observing the Expression of Ethnocentric Fairness

Michael J. Platow, John Hunter, Nyla Branscombe, Diana GRACE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although fairness rules provide a basis for conflict resolution, social and psychological processes can lead people to use these rules flexibly to allow their own groups to compare favorably relative to other groups. In two studies, we examined the expression of such ethnocentric fairness in the context of the Olympic Games. Participants rated the fairness of different methods of determining relative rankings of countries’ performances. Results showed that participants used fairness rules flexibly in ways likely to enhance the relative standing of their own country. Thus, even in this context of normative intergroup harmony, fairness rules can be a basis for intergroup conflict. We conclude that fairness rules are best understood as dynamic constructions reflecting the realities of social life and identity-related processes involved in negotiating that social life.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-304
Number of pages22
JournalSocial Justice Research
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

fairness
creativity
Olympic Games
conflict resolution
ranking
Group
performance

Cite this

Platow, Michael J. ; Hunter, John ; Branscombe, Nyla ; GRACE, Diana. / Social Creativity in Olympic Medal Counts: Observing the Expression of Ethnocentric Fairness. In: Social Justice Research. 2014 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 283-304.
@article{a36bf0c189434febb1f6a5ac9c9af817,
title = "Social Creativity in Olympic Medal Counts: Observing the Expression of Ethnocentric Fairness",
abstract = "Although fairness rules provide a basis for conflict resolution, social and psychological processes can lead people to use these rules flexibly to allow their own groups to compare favorably relative to other groups. In two studies, we examined the expression of such ethnocentric fairness in the context of the Olympic Games. Participants rated the fairness of different methods of determining relative rankings of countries’ performances. Results showed that participants used fairness rules flexibly in ways likely to enhance the relative standing of their own country. Thus, even in this context of normative intergroup harmony, fairness rules can be a basis for intergroup conflict. We conclude that fairness rules are best understood as dynamic constructions reflecting the realities of social life and identity-related processes involved in negotiating that social life.",
author = "Platow, {Michael J.} and John Hunter and Nyla Branscombe and Diana GRACE",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s11211-014-0219-1",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "283--304",
journal = "Social Justice Research",
issn = "0885-7466",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Social Creativity in Olympic Medal Counts: Observing the Expression of Ethnocentric Fairness. / Platow, Michael J.; Hunter, John; Branscombe, Nyla; GRACE, Diana.

In: Social Justice Research, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2014, p. 283-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Creativity in Olympic Medal Counts: Observing the Expression of Ethnocentric Fairness

AU - Platow, Michael J.

AU - Hunter, John

AU - Branscombe, Nyla

AU - GRACE, Diana

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Although fairness rules provide a basis for conflict resolution, social and psychological processes can lead people to use these rules flexibly to allow their own groups to compare favorably relative to other groups. In two studies, we examined the expression of such ethnocentric fairness in the context of the Olympic Games. Participants rated the fairness of different methods of determining relative rankings of countries’ performances. Results showed that participants used fairness rules flexibly in ways likely to enhance the relative standing of their own country. Thus, even in this context of normative intergroup harmony, fairness rules can be a basis for intergroup conflict. We conclude that fairness rules are best understood as dynamic constructions reflecting the realities of social life and identity-related processes involved in negotiating that social life.

AB - Although fairness rules provide a basis for conflict resolution, social and psychological processes can lead people to use these rules flexibly to allow their own groups to compare favorably relative to other groups. In two studies, we examined the expression of such ethnocentric fairness in the context of the Olympic Games. Participants rated the fairness of different methods of determining relative rankings of countries’ performances. Results showed that participants used fairness rules flexibly in ways likely to enhance the relative standing of their own country. Thus, even in this context of normative intergroup harmony, fairness rules can be a basis for intergroup conflict. We conclude that fairness rules are best understood as dynamic constructions reflecting the realities of social life and identity-related processes involved in negotiating that social life.

U2 - 10.1007/s11211-014-0219-1

DO - 10.1007/s11211-014-0219-1

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 283

EP - 304

JO - Social Justice Research

JF - Social Justice Research

SN - 0885-7466

IS - 3

ER -