Social Inclusion and Exclusion amount Australia's Chi8ldren: A Review of the Literature

Anne Daly

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    Abstract

    This paper reviews the literature in three key areas covered by an Australian
    Research Council grant, ‘Social Inclusion and Exclusion among Australia’s Children:
    A Spatial Perspective’ (DP 560192). These are the evidence on the position of children
    in society, more particularly estimates of child poverty in Australia and how these
    compare with the level of child poverty in other developed countries; the
    methodological issues of measuring the broader concept of social exclusion and the
    results from applying this framework in Australia and other developed countries;
    and finally the Australian and international evidence on the relationship between
    area of residence and social exclusion. A risk of social exclusion arises when children
    suffer from multiple disadvantages that make it difficult for them to actively
    participate in society.
    The international evidence shows Australia in the middle of the league table on child
    poverty and that child poverty increased in many OECD countries over the 1990s.
    While the causes are complex, research suggests that demographic factors such as
    the age of the parents and family structure, labour market factors including the
    unemployment rate, and the tax and transfer system are important determinants of
    the level of child poverty. Children in jobless households, sole parent families and
    members of minority groups faced the greatest risk of living in poverty.
    The social exclusion framework examines a broader range of indicators than the
    more limited focus on household income as a measure of poverty. These include
    indicators of labour market status, educational attainment, housing status, health
    and social interaction. The argument for combining this into one summary measure
    of wellbeing must be traded off against the benefits of presenting more detailed
    results on individual indicators. The evidence shows that while income is correlated
    with many of the other indicators of risk of social exclusion, it is far from being
    perfectly correlated and additional insight can be gained from using a wider range of
    indicators.
    The final research area of interest was the relationship between area of residence and
    social exclusion. While there is some evidence of a neighbourhood effect on
    outcomes, it appears to be less important than individual and family factors in
    determining disadvantage. The literature on the position of children in Australia in
    the social exclusion framework is limited and this paper provides a basis for our
    further exploration of this area.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationCanberra
    PublisherNATSEM
    Pages1-43
    Number of pages43
    Volume62
    ISBN (Print)1740882628
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Fingerprint

    exclusion
    inclusion
    poverty
    evidence
    parents
    labor market
    literature
    demographic factors
    family structure
    household income
    taxes
    OECD
    grant
    housing
    minority
    determinants
    income
    cause
    interaction
    Group

    Cite this

    @techreport{f71b9dc32e994ab8a6db2313482ca3ab,
    title = "Social Inclusion and Exclusion amount Australia's Chi8ldren: A Review of the Literature",
    abstract = "This paper reviews the literature in three key areas covered by an AustralianResearch Council grant, ‘Social Inclusion and Exclusion among Australia’s Children:A Spatial Perspective’ (DP 560192). These are the evidence on the position of childrenin society, more particularly estimates of child poverty in Australia and how thesecompare with the level of child poverty in other developed countries; themethodological issues of measuring the broader concept of social exclusion and theresults from applying this framework in Australia and other developed countries;and finally the Australian and international evidence on the relationship betweenarea of residence and social exclusion. A risk of social exclusion arises when childrensuffer from multiple disadvantages that make it difficult for them to activelyparticipate in society.The international evidence shows Australia in the middle of the league table on childpoverty and that child poverty increased in many OECD countries over the 1990s.While the causes are complex, research suggests that demographic factors such asthe age of the parents and family structure, labour market factors including theunemployment rate, and the tax and transfer system are important determinants ofthe level of child poverty. Children in jobless households, sole parent families andmembers of minority groups faced the greatest risk of living in poverty.The social exclusion framework examines a broader range of indicators than themore limited focus on household income as a measure of poverty. These includeindicators of labour market status, educational attainment, housing status, healthand social interaction. The argument for combining this into one summary measureof wellbeing must be traded off against the benefits of presenting more detailedresults on individual indicators. The evidence shows that while income is correlatedwith many of the other indicators of risk of social exclusion, it is far from beingperfectly correlated and additional insight can be gained from using a wider range ofindicators.The final research area of interest was the relationship between area of residence andsocial exclusion. While there is some evidence of a neighbourhood effect onoutcomes, it appears to be less important than individual and family factors indetermining disadvantage. The literature on the position of children in Australia inthe social exclusion framework is limited and this paper provides a basis for ourfurther exploration of this area.",
    author = "Anne Daly",
    year = "2006",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "1740882628",
    volume = "62",
    pages = "1--43",
    publisher = "NATSEM",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "NATSEM",

    }

    Social Inclusion and Exclusion amount Australia's Chi8ldren: A Review of the Literature. / Daly, Anne.

    Canberra : NATSEM, 2006. p. 1-43.

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Social Inclusion and Exclusion amount Australia's Chi8ldren: A Review of the Literature

    AU - Daly, Anne

    PY - 2006

    Y1 - 2006

    N2 - This paper reviews the literature in three key areas covered by an AustralianResearch Council grant, ‘Social Inclusion and Exclusion among Australia’s Children:A Spatial Perspective’ (DP 560192). These are the evidence on the position of childrenin society, more particularly estimates of child poverty in Australia and how thesecompare with the level of child poverty in other developed countries; themethodological issues of measuring the broader concept of social exclusion and theresults from applying this framework in Australia and other developed countries;and finally the Australian and international evidence on the relationship betweenarea of residence and social exclusion. A risk of social exclusion arises when childrensuffer from multiple disadvantages that make it difficult for them to activelyparticipate in society.The international evidence shows Australia in the middle of the league table on childpoverty and that child poverty increased in many OECD countries over the 1990s.While the causes are complex, research suggests that demographic factors such asthe age of the parents and family structure, labour market factors including theunemployment rate, and the tax and transfer system are important determinants ofthe level of child poverty. Children in jobless households, sole parent families andmembers of minority groups faced the greatest risk of living in poverty.The social exclusion framework examines a broader range of indicators than themore limited focus on household income as a measure of poverty. These includeindicators of labour market status, educational attainment, housing status, healthand social interaction. The argument for combining this into one summary measureof wellbeing must be traded off against the benefits of presenting more detailedresults on individual indicators. The evidence shows that while income is correlatedwith many of the other indicators of risk of social exclusion, it is far from beingperfectly correlated and additional insight can be gained from using a wider range ofindicators.The final research area of interest was the relationship between area of residence andsocial exclusion. While there is some evidence of a neighbourhood effect onoutcomes, it appears to be less important than individual and family factors indetermining disadvantage. The literature on the position of children in Australia inthe social exclusion framework is limited and this paper provides a basis for ourfurther exploration of this area.

    AB - This paper reviews the literature in three key areas covered by an AustralianResearch Council grant, ‘Social Inclusion and Exclusion among Australia’s Children:A Spatial Perspective’ (DP 560192). These are the evidence on the position of childrenin society, more particularly estimates of child poverty in Australia and how thesecompare with the level of child poverty in other developed countries; themethodological issues of measuring the broader concept of social exclusion and theresults from applying this framework in Australia and other developed countries;and finally the Australian and international evidence on the relationship betweenarea of residence and social exclusion. A risk of social exclusion arises when childrensuffer from multiple disadvantages that make it difficult for them to activelyparticipate in society.The international evidence shows Australia in the middle of the league table on childpoverty and that child poverty increased in many OECD countries over the 1990s.While the causes are complex, research suggests that demographic factors such asthe age of the parents and family structure, labour market factors including theunemployment rate, and the tax and transfer system are important determinants ofthe level of child poverty. Children in jobless households, sole parent families andmembers of minority groups faced the greatest risk of living in poverty.The social exclusion framework examines a broader range of indicators than themore limited focus on household income as a measure of poverty. These includeindicators of labour market status, educational attainment, housing status, healthand social interaction. The argument for combining this into one summary measureof wellbeing must be traded off against the benefits of presenting more detailedresults on individual indicators. The evidence shows that while income is correlatedwith many of the other indicators of risk of social exclusion, it is far from beingperfectly correlated and additional insight can be gained from using a wider range ofindicators.The final research area of interest was the relationship between area of residence andsocial exclusion. While there is some evidence of a neighbourhood effect onoutcomes, it appears to be less important than individual and family factors indetermining disadvantage. The literature on the position of children in Australia inthe social exclusion framework is limited and this paper provides a basis for ourfurther exploration of this area.

    M3 - Discussion paper

    SN - 1740882628

    VL - 62

    SP - 1

    EP - 43

    BT - Social Inclusion and Exclusion amount Australia's Chi8ldren: A Review of the Literature

    PB - NATSEM

    CY - Canberra

    ER -