TY - JOUR
T1 - Social objectives of fisheries management: What are managers' priorities?
AU - Pascoe, Sean
AU - Brooks, Kate
AU - Cannard, Toni
AU - Ditchmont, Catherine
AU - Jebreen, Eddie
AU - SCHIRMER, Jacki
AU - Triantafillos, Lianos
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was undertaken as part of the FRDC funded project “Developing and Testing Social Objectives and Indicators for Fisheries Management ( FRDC Project 2010/040 )”. The authors would like to thank the participants at the workshops, and also those who participated in the AHP survey. We would also like to thank James Innes and Trevor Hutton and the three anonymous journal reviewers for comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Increasingly, social considerations are having an influence on fisheries policy as well as day-to-day management decision making. Social objectives, unlike economic or conservation objectives, are often poorly defined in fisheries policy, providing substantial leeway for managers to develop management plans in response to the perceived importance of different social outcomes, and potential inconsistencies between different fisheries and jurisdictions. In this paper, through a literature review and workshop with managers across different Australian jurisdictions, we develop a set of social objectives that may be applicable in Australian fisheries. We assess the importance of these different objectives using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, and find considerable diversity in opinion as to which social objectives fisheries management should prioritise to achieve. This diversity of opinion is not directly related to jurisdiction, but does seem related to the context and social environment in which fisheries managers are operating.
AB - Increasingly, social considerations are having an influence on fisheries policy as well as day-to-day management decision making. Social objectives, unlike economic or conservation objectives, are often poorly defined in fisheries policy, providing substantial leeway for managers to develop management plans in response to the perceived importance of different social outcomes, and potential inconsistencies between different fisheries and jurisdictions. In this paper, through a literature review and workshop with managers across different Australian jurisdictions, we develop a set of social objectives that may be applicable in Australian fisheries. We assess the importance of these different objectives using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, and find considerable diversity in opinion as to which social objectives fisheries management should prioritise to achieve. This diversity of opinion is not directly related to jurisdiction, but does seem related to the context and social environment in which fisheries managers are operating.
KW - Decision making
KW - Economic Analysis
KW - Environmental Legislation
KW - Fisheries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902589488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.05.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.05.014
M3 - Article
SN - 0964-5691
VL - 98
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - Ocean and Coastal Management
JF - Ocean and Coastal Management
IS - Sep
ER -