Social roles, social norms, and self-presentation in the quiz effect of ross, amabile, and steinmetz

Keith Gibbins, Iain Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The quiz effect describes the tendency of contestants, but not questioners, in a quiz-game setting to discount the arbitrary nature of their roles in over-attributing cleverness to the questioner. This tendency is generally viewed as an example of the fundamental attribution error and is usually explained in terms of cognitive processes. An alternative explanation is proposed that suggests that the effect reflects impression-management tactics, especially compliance to the norm of modesty. In the present Australian study, the quiz effect was replicated when questioners and answerers rated past behaviors. However, when future performance in a quiz-game setting was predicted, there was no evidence of the effect. These results are consistent with a normative, not cognitive, explanation of the effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)625-634
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume136
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Norms

Cite this

@article{b7f498eb4a874afb90d7f8758f8f82b6,
title = "Social roles, social norms, and self-presentation in the quiz effect of ross, amabile, and steinmetz",
abstract = "The quiz effect describes the tendency of contestants, but not questioners, in a quiz-game setting to discount the arbitrary nature of their roles in over-attributing cleverness to the questioner. This tendency is generally viewed as an example of the fundamental attribution error and is usually explained in terms of cognitive processes. An alternative explanation is proposed that suggests that the effect reflects impression-management tactics, especially compliance to the norm of modesty. In the present Australian study, the quiz effect was replicated when questioners and answerers rated past behaviors. However, when future performance in a quiz-game setting was predicted, there was no evidence of the effect. These results are consistent with a normative, not cognitive, explanation of the effect.",
author = "Keith Gibbins and Iain Walker",
year = "1996",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00224545.1996.9714046",
language = "English",
volume = "136",
pages = "625--634",
journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

Social roles, social norms, and self-presentation in the quiz effect of ross, amabile, and steinmetz. / Gibbins, Keith; Walker, Iain.

In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 136, No. 5, 01.10.1996, p. 625-634.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social roles, social norms, and self-presentation in the quiz effect of ross, amabile, and steinmetz

AU - Gibbins, Keith

AU - Walker, Iain

PY - 1996/10/1

Y1 - 1996/10/1

N2 - The quiz effect describes the tendency of contestants, but not questioners, in a quiz-game setting to discount the arbitrary nature of their roles in over-attributing cleverness to the questioner. This tendency is generally viewed as an example of the fundamental attribution error and is usually explained in terms of cognitive processes. An alternative explanation is proposed that suggests that the effect reflects impression-management tactics, especially compliance to the norm of modesty. In the present Australian study, the quiz effect was replicated when questioners and answerers rated past behaviors. However, when future performance in a quiz-game setting was predicted, there was no evidence of the effect. These results are consistent with a normative, not cognitive, explanation of the effect.

AB - The quiz effect describes the tendency of contestants, but not questioners, in a quiz-game setting to discount the arbitrary nature of their roles in over-attributing cleverness to the questioner. This tendency is generally viewed as an example of the fundamental attribution error and is usually explained in terms of cognitive processes. An alternative explanation is proposed that suggests that the effect reflects impression-management tactics, especially compliance to the norm of modesty. In the present Australian study, the quiz effect was replicated when questioners and answerers rated past behaviors. However, when future performance in a quiz-game setting was predicted, there was no evidence of the effect. These results are consistent with a normative, not cognitive, explanation of the effect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030254262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00224545.1996.9714046

DO - 10.1080/00224545.1996.9714046

M3 - Article

VL - 136

SP - 625

EP - 634

JO - Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

IS - 5

ER -