Abstract
The quiz effect describes the tendency of contestants, but not questioners, in a quiz-game setting to discount the arbitrary nature of their roles in over-attributing cleverness to the questioner. This tendency is generally viewed as an example of the fundamental attribution error and is usually explained in terms of cognitive processes. An alternative explanation is proposed that suggests that the effect reflects impression-management tactics, especially compliance to the norm of modesty. In the present Australian study, the quiz effect was replicated when questioners and answerers rated past behaviors. However, when future performance in a quiz-game setting was predicted, there was no evidence of the effect. These results are consistent with a normative, not cognitive, explanation of the effect.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 625-634 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 136 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 1996 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Social roles, social norms, and self-presentation in the quiz effect of ross, amabile, and steinmetz. / Gibbins, Keith; Walker, Iain.
In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 136, No. 5, 01.10.1996, p. 625-634.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Social roles, social norms, and self-presentation in the quiz effect of ross, amabile, and steinmetz
AU - Gibbins, Keith
AU - Walker, Iain
PY - 1996/10/1
Y1 - 1996/10/1
N2 - The quiz effect describes the tendency of contestants, but not questioners, in a quiz-game setting to discount the arbitrary nature of their roles in over-attributing cleverness to the questioner. This tendency is generally viewed as an example of the fundamental attribution error and is usually explained in terms of cognitive processes. An alternative explanation is proposed that suggests that the effect reflects impression-management tactics, especially compliance to the norm of modesty. In the present Australian study, the quiz effect was replicated when questioners and answerers rated past behaviors. However, when future performance in a quiz-game setting was predicted, there was no evidence of the effect. These results are consistent with a normative, not cognitive, explanation of the effect.
AB - The quiz effect describes the tendency of contestants, but not questioners, in a quiz-game setting to discount the arbitrary nature of their roles in over-attributing cleverness to the questioner. This tendency is generally viewed as an example of the fundamental attribution error and is usually explained in terms of cognitive processes. An alternative explanation is proposed that suggests that the effect reflects impression-management tactics, especially compliance to the norm of modesty. In the present Australian study, the quiz effect was replicated when questioners and answerers rated past behaviors. However, when future performance in a quiz-game setting was predicted, there was no evidence of the effect. These results are consistent with a normative, not cognitive, explanation of the effect.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030254262&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00224545.1996.9714046
DO - 10.1080/00224545.1996.9714046
M3 - Article
VL - 136
SP - 625
EP - 634
JO - Journal of Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Social Psychology
SN - 0022-4545
IS - 5
ER -