Soft law, responsibility and the biopolitics of front-of-pack food labels

Brendon Murphy, Jay Sanderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Front-of-pack (FOP) food labels are increasingly used by government and industry to provide nutrition information to consumers for the promotion of healthier eating habits. However, quantitative and qualitative research into the effectiveness of FOP food labelling schemes is in its infancy and, at this stage at least, is largely unconvincing. Using Australia’s health star rating system as an exemplar, in this article we provide a novel perspective on FOP food labels and in so doing make two (related) arguments about FOP food labels and in many ways about food label schemes more broadly. The first argument is that FOP food labels enliven a combination of hard and soft law. The second argument, informed by Foucault’s notion of governmentality, is that FOP food labelling functions as a technology of the self. Drawing these two arguments together, we conclude that FOP food labels rely on a distorted rationality, because (i) the main actors in the process–food companies–are placed in a position of self-regulatory actors, fundamentally oriented to an economic rather than biopolitical agenda; and (ii) the biopolitics of population health through FOP food labels assumes particular kinds of rational consumers, when the reality of social life is far more complex.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-377
Number of pages23
JournalGriffith Law Review
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

food
responsibility
Law
eating habits
governmentality
quantitative research
health
nutrition
rationality
qualitative research
promotion
rating
industry
economics

Cite this

@article{a2f18844104a4199bcd0285ac70474e5,
title = "Soft law, responsibility and the biopolitics of front-of-pack food labels",
abstract = "Front-of-pack (FOP) food labels are increasingly used by government and industry to provide nutrition information to consumers for the promotion of healthier eating habits. However, quantitative and qualitative research into the effectiveness of FOP food labelling schemes is in its infancy and, at this stage at least, is largely unconvincing. Using Australia’s health star rating system as an exemplar, in this article we provide a novel perspective on FOP food labels and in so doing make two (related) arguments about FOP food labels and in many ways about food label schemes more broadly. The first argument is that FOP food labels enliven a combination of hard and soft law. The second argument, informed by Foucault’s notion of governmentality, is that FOP food labelling functions as a technology of the self. Drawing these two arguments together, we conclude that FOP food labels rely on a distorted rationality, because (i) the main actors in the process–food companies–are placed in a position of self-regulatory actors, fundamentally oriented to an economic rather than biopolitical agenda; and (ii) the biopolitics of population health through FOP food labels assumes particular kinds of rational consumers, when the reality of social life is far more complex.",
keywords = "biopolitics, FOP food labels, Foucault, governmentality, Law, regulation",
author = "Brendon Murphy and Jay Sanderson",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/10383441.2017.1436371",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "355--377",
journal = "Griffith Law Review",
issn = "1038-3441",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Soft law, responsibility and the biopolitics of front-of-pack food labels. / Murphy, Brendon; Sanderson, Jay.

In: Griffith Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, 07.2017, p. 355-377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soft law, responsibility and the biopolitics of front-of-pack food labels

AU - Murphy, Brendon

AU - Sanderson, Jay

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - Front-of-pack (FOP) food labels are increasingly used by government and industry to provide nutrition information to consumers for the promotion of healthier eating habits. However, quantitative and qualitative research into the effectiveness of FOP food labelling schemes is in its infancy and, at this stage at least, is largely unconvincing. Using Australia’s health star rating system as an exemplar, in this article we provide a novel perspective on FOP food labels and in so doing make two (related) arguments about FOP food labels and in many ways about food label schemes more broadly. The first argument is that FOP food labels enliven a combination of hard and soft law. The second argument, informed by Foucault’s notion of governmentality, is that FOP food labelling functions as a technology of the self. Drawing these two arguments together, we conclude that FOP food labels rely on a distorted rationality, because (i) the main actors in the process–food companies–are placed in a position of self-regulatory actors, fundamentally oriented to an economic rather than biopolitical agenda; and (ii) the biopolitics of population health through FOP food labels assumes particular kinds of rational consumers, when the reality of social life is far more complex.

AB - Front-of-pack (FOP) food labels are increasingly used by government and industry to provide nutrition information to consumers for the promotion of healthier eating habits. However, quantitative and qualitative research into the effectiveness of FOP food labelling schemes is in its infancy and, at this stage at least, is largely unconvincing. Using Australia’s health star rating system as an exemplar, in this article we provide a novel perspective on FOP food labels and in so doing make two (related) arguments about FOP food labels and in many ways about food label schemes more broadly. The first argument is that FOP food labels enliven a combination of hard and soft law. The second argument, informed by Foucault’s notion of governmentality, is that FOP food labelling functions as a technology of the self. Drawing these two arguments together, we conclude that FOP food labels rely on a distorted rationality, because (i) the main actors in the process–food companies–are placed in a position of self-regulatory actors, fundamentally oriented to an economic rather than biopolitical agenda; and (ii) the biopolitics of population health through FOP food labels assumes particular kinds of rational consumers, when the reality of social life is far more complex.

KW - biopolitics

KW - FOP food labels

KW - Foucault

KW - governmentality

KW - Law

KW - regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044654119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/soft-law-responsibility-biopolitics-frontofpack-food-labels

U2 - 10.1080/10383441.2017.1436371

DO - 10.1080/10383441.2017.1436371

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 355

EP - 377

JO - Griffith Law Review

JF - Griffith Law Review

SN - 1038-3441

IS - 3

ER -