Sources of variation in linking corporate social responsibility and financial performance

Ali Quazi, Alice Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose – This purpose of this paper is to identify the possible sources of variation of results in prior studies linking corporate social responsibility (CSR) with corporate financial performance (CFP). Design/methodology/approach – A meta‐analysis was performed on 51 prior studies included in Orlitzky et al. in order to ensure compatibility with previous results. The meta‐analysis is based on sub‐groups of papers in five‐year time intervals focusing on sample size and methodology employed as the sources of variation concerning the nexus between CSR and CFP. Findings – The major finding of the study is that sample size and methodology are significant sources of variation in measuring the link between CSR and CFP. Research limitations/implications – The findings are likely to help develop a structural framework towards broadening and deepening our understanding of the debate regarding the sources of variation in the measurement of CSR and CFP link. This research is limited to papers published up to 1999 as included in Orlitzky et al. Future research can update the findings by using data beyond 1999. Originality/value – This paper can be considered an advance on the previous research as it contributes to broadening our understanding of the possible source of causes of variation in results of studies linking CSR with CFP.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-256
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Responsibility Journal
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

social responsibility
performance
methodology
Corporate Social Responsibility
Financial performance
Corporate financial performance
cause
Values
Meta-analysis
Methodology
Sample size

Cite this

@article{e265253d9378486bae7bc7e5e2a26c6b,
title = "Sources of variation in linking corporate social responsibility and financial performance",
abstract = "Purpose – This purpose of this paper is to identify the possible sources of variation of results in prior studies linking corporate social responsibility (CSR) with corporate financial performance (CFP). Design/methodology/approach – A meta‐analysis was performed on 51 prior studies included in Orlitzky et al. in order to ensure compatibility with previous results. The meta‐analysis is based on sub‐groups of papers in five‐year time intervals focusing on sample size and methodology employed as the sources of variation concerning the nexus between CSR and CFP. Findings – The major finding of the study is that sample size and methodology are significant sources of variation in measuring the link between CSR and CFP. Research limitations/implications – The findings are likely to help develop a structural framework towards broadening and deepening our understanding of the debate regarding the sources of variation in the measurement of CSR and CFP link. This research is limited to papers published up to 1999 as included in Orlitzky et al. Future research can update the findings by using data beyond 1999. Originality/value – This paper can be considered an advance on the previous research as it contributes to broadening our understanding of the possible source of causes of variation in results of studies linking CSR with CFP.",
keywords = "Corporate social responsibility, Financial performance, Meta analysis, Profitability, Sub-group analysis, Company performance",
author = "Ali Quazi and Alice Richardson",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1108/17471111211234860",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "242--256",
journal = "Social Responsibility Journal",
issn = "1747-1117",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Sources of variation in linking corporate social responsibility and financial performance. / Quazi, Ali; Richardson, Alice.

In: Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2012, p. 242-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sources of variation in linking corporate social responsibility and financial performance

AU - Quazi, Ali

AU - Richardson, Alice

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose – This purpose of this paper is to identify the possible sources of variation of results in prior studies linking corporate social responsibility (CSR) with corporate financial performance (CFP). Design/methodology/approach – A meta‐analysis was performed on 51 prior studies included in Orlitzky et al. in order to ensure compatibility with previous results. The meta‐analysis is based on sub‐groups of papers in five‐year time intervals focusing on sample size and methodology employed as the sources of variation concerning the nexus between CSR and CFP. Findings – The major finding of the study is that sample size and methodology are significant sources of variation in measuring the link between CSR and CFP. Research limitations/implications – The findings are likely to help develop a structural framework towards broadening and deepening our understanding of the debate regarding the sources of variation in the measurement of CSR and CFP link. This research is limited to papers published up to 1999 as included in Orlitzky et al. Future research can update the findings by using data beyond 1999. Originality/value – This paper can be considered an advance on the previous research as it contributes to broadening our understanding of the possible source of causes of variation in results of studies linking CSR with CFP.

AB - Purpose – This purpose of this paper is to identify the possible sources of variation of results in prior studies linking corporate social responsibility (CSR) with corporate financial performance (CFP). Design/methodology/approach – A meta‐analysis was performed on 51 prior studies included in Orlitzky et al. in order to ensure compatibility with previous results. The meta‐analysis is based on sub‐groups of papers in five‐year time intervals focusing on sample size and methodology employed as the sources of variation concerning the nexus between CSR and CFP. Findings – The major finding of the study is that sample size and methodology are significant sources of variation in measuring the link between CSR and CFP. Research limitations/implications – The findings are likely to help develop a structural framework towards broadening and deepening our understanding of the debate regarding the sources of variation in the measurement of CSR and CFP link. This research is limited to papers published up to 1999 as included in Orlitzky et al. Future research can update the findings by using data beyond 1999. Originality/value – This paper can be considered an advance on the previous research as it contributes to broadening our understanding of the possible source of causes of variation in results of studies linking CSR with CFP.

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - Financial performance

KW - Meta analysis

KW - Profitability

KW - Sub-group analysis

KW - Company performance

U2 - 10.1108/17471111211234860

DO - 10.1108/17471111211234860

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 242

EP - 256

JO - Social Responsibility Journal

JF - Social Responsibility Journal

SN - 1747-1117

IS - 2

ER -