Spatial and environmental components of freshwater zooplankton structure

B. Pinel-Alloul, T. Niyonsenga, P. Legendre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

113 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Paradigms based upon physical and geochemical bottom-up processes or trophic cascade/top down theory have been developed to explain heterogeneity of freshwater zooplankton, but these paradigms taken alone seem unable to encompass the full range of zooplankton variability and have led to controversy. The goal of the study is to test the hypothesis that both abiotic and biotic environmental factors, and spatial structuring, explain simultaneously the large-scale spatial heterogeneity of freshwater zooplankton in Québec lakes. Partial Canonical Correspondence Analysis (Partial CCA) was used to partition the variance of zooplankton species abundances into independent components: a) non-spatial environmental factors (physics, chemistry, morphometry, phytoplankton and fish communities), b) spatial component of environmental influence, c) pure spatial factors (geographic coordinates), and d) undetermined. Our study shows that pure and spatially-structured abiotic and biotic environmental factors (a+b) explain 48% of the variation of zooplankton within Québec lakes. Our study supports the multiple driving forces hypothesis and shows that the control model of the zooplankton structure within Québec lakes includes both abiotic factors (mainly related to the water chemistry gradients) and biotic bottom-up (phytoplankton) and top-down (fish) factors. Across our large geographic scale, the abiotic factors, especially those related to water chemistry, are the main environmental processes explaining zooplankton community structure variability within Québec. Pure spatial factors (c) have small and nonsignificant contribution (8%) to zooplankton variation. The large amount of unexplained variation (d: 44%) suggests that other external factors, operating at local scales and not taken into account in this study, can exert influence on lake zooplankton structure.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalEcoscience
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

zooplankton
environmental factors
lakes
environmental factor
lake
hydrochemistry
water chemistry
phytoplankton
trophic cascade
morphometry
physics
fish
correspondence analysis
chemistry
community structure

Cite this

Pinel-Alloul, B. ; Niyonsenga, T. ; Legendre, P. / Spatial and environmental components of freshwater zooplankton structure. In: Ecoscience. 1995 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 1-19.
@article{280d5ab5bccb40c9b6e33fbe5cb466d2,
title = "Spatial and environmental components of freshwater zooplankton structure",
abstract = "Paradigms based upon physical and geochemical bottom-up processes or trophic cascade/top down theory have been developed to explain heterogeneity of freshwater zooplankton, but these paradigms taken alone seem unable to encompass the full range of zooplankton variability and have led to controversy. The goal of the study is to test the hypothesis that both abiotic and biotic environmental factors, and spatial structuring, explain simultaneously the large-scale spatial heterogeneity of freshwater zooplankton in Qu{\'e}bec lakes. Partial Canonical Correspondence Analysis (Partial CCA) was used to partition the variance of zooplankton species abundances into independent components: a) non-spatial environmental factors (physics, chemistry, morphometry, phytoplankton and fish communities), b) spatial component of environmental influence, c) pure spatial factors (geographic coordinates), and d) undetermined. Our study shows that pure and spatially-structured abiotic and biotic environmental factors (a+b) explain 48{\%} of the variation of zooplankton within Qu{\'e}bec lakes. Our study supports the multiple driving forces hypothesis and shows that the control model of the zooplankton structure within Qu{\'e}bec lakes includes both abiotic factors (mainly related to the water chemistry gradients) and biotic bottom-up (phytoplankton) and top-down (fish) factors. Across our large geographic scale, the abiotic factors, especially those related to water chemistry, are the main environmental processes explaining zooplankton community structure variability within Qu{\'e}bec. Pure spatial factors (c) have small and nonsignificant contribution (8{\%}) to zooplankton variation. The large amount of unexplained variation (d: 44{\%}) suggests that other external factors, operating at local scales and not taken into account in this study, can exert influence on lake zooplankton structure.",
author = "B. Pinel-Alloul and T. Niyonsenga and P. Legendre",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/11956860.1995.11682263",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Ecoscience",
issn = "1195-6860",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Spatial and environmental components of freshwater zooplankton structure. / Pinel-Alloul, B.; Niyonsenga, T.; Legendre, P.

In: Ecoscience, Vol. 2, No. 1, 01.01.1995, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial and environmental components of freshwater zooplankton structure

AU - Pinel-Alloul, B.

AU - Niyonsenga, T.

AU - Legendre, P.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Paradigms based upon physical and geochemical bottom-up processes or trophic cascade/top down theory have been developed to explain heterogeneity of freshwater zooplankton, but these paradigms taken alone seem unable to encompass the full range of zooplankton variability and have led to controversy. The goal of the study is to test the hypothesis that both abiotic and biotic environmental factors, and spatial structuring, explain simultaneously the large-scale spatial heterogeneity of freshwater zooplankton in Québec lakes. Partial Canonical Correspondence Analysis (Partial CCA) was used to partition the variance of zooplankton species abundances into independent components: a) non-spatial environmental factors (physics, chemistry, morphometry, phytoplankton and fish communities), b) spatial component of environmental influence, c) pure spatial factors (geographic coordinates), and d) undetermined. Our study shows that pure and spatially-structured abiotic and biotic environmental factors (a+b) explain 48% of the variation of zooplankton within Québec lakes. Our study supports the multiple driving forces hypothesis and shows that the control model of the zooplankton structure within Québec lakes includes both abiotic factors (mainly related to the water chemistry gradients) and biotic bottom-up (phytoplankton) and top-down (fish) factors. Across our large geographic scale, the abiotic factors, especially those related to water chemistry, are the main environmental processes explaining zooplankton community structure variability within Québec. Pure spatial factors (c) have small and nonsignificant contribution (8%) to zooplankton variation. The large amount of unexplained variation (d: 44%) suggests that other external factors, operating at local scales and not taken into account in this study, can exert influence on lake zooplankton structure.

AB - Paradigms based upon physical and geochemical bottom-up processes or trophic cascade/top down theory have been developed to explain heterogeneity of freshwater zooplankton, but these paradigms taken alone seem unable to encompass the full range of zooplankton variability and have led to controversy. The goal of the study is to test the hypothesis that both abiotic and biotic environmental factors, and spatial structuring, explain simultaneously the large-scale spatial heterogeneity of freshwater zooplankton in Québec lakes. Partial Canonical Correspondence Analysis (Partial CCA) was used to partition the variance of zooplankton species abundances into independent components: a) non-spatial environmental factors (physics, chemistry, morphometry, phytoplankton and fish communities), b) spatial component of environmental influence, c) pure spatial factors (geographic coordinates), and d) undetermined. Our study shows that pure and spatially-structured abiotic and biotic environmental factors (a+b) explain 48% of the variation of zooplankton within Québec lakes. Our study supports the multiple driving forces hypothesis and shows that the control model of the zooplankton structure within Québec lakes includes both abiotic factors (mainly related to the water chemistry gradients) and biotic bottom-up (phytoplankton) and top-down (fish) factors. Across our large geographic scale, the abiotic factors, especially those related to water chemistry, are the main environmental processes explaining zooplankton community structure variability within Québec. Pure spatial factors (c) have small and nonsignificant contribution (8%) to zooplankton variation. The large amount of unexplained variation (d: 44%) suggests that other external factors, operating at local scales and not taken into account in this study, can exert influence on lake zooplankton structure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028993626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/11956860.1995.11682263

DO - 10.1080/11956860.1995.11682263

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Ecoscience

JF - Ecoscience

SN - 1195-6860

IS - 1

ER -