Spatial and socioeconomic inequities in liveability in Australia'S 21 largest cities: Does city size matter?

Billie Giles-Corti, Tayebeh Saghapour, Gavin Turrell, Lucy Gunn, Alan Both, Melanie Lowe, Julianna Rozek, Rebecca Roberts, Paula Hooper, Andrew Butt, Carl Higgs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Spatial and area-level socioeconomic variation in urban liveability (access to social infrastructure, public transport, open space, healthy food choices, local employment, street connectivity, dwelling density, and housing affordability) was examined and mapped across 39,967 residential statistical areas in Australia's metropolitan (n = 7) and largest regional cities (n = 14). Urban liveability varied spatially, with inner-city areas more liveable than outer suburbs. Disadvantaged areas in larger metropolitan cities were less liveable than advantaged areas, but this pattern was reversed in smaller cities. Local data could inform policies to redress inequities, including those designed to avoid disadvantage being suburbanised as cities grow and gentrify.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102899
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalHealth and Place
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2022
Externally publishedYes

Cite this