Speech-language pathologists' views on attrition from the profession

Emma McLaughlin, Michelle Lincoln, Barbara Adamson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify common themes in speech-language pathologists' perceptions of factors that increase and decrease their experiences of job stress, their satisfaction with their jobs and the profession, and their opinions about why people chose to leave the speech-language pathology profession. The participants' perceptions about the relationships between job stress, work satisfaction and job and profession retention were also explored. Sixty members of Speech Pathology Australia from a range of geographical and professional contexts were asked to participate in telephone interviews. Eighteen speech-language pathologists agreed to participate (30% response rate), and took part in semi-structured telephone interviews. Two researchers independently coded transcripts of the interviews for themes. Eight major themes were identified. These were positive aspects of the profession, workload, non-work obligations, effectiveness, recognition, support, learning and autonomy. The themes that emerged from analysis of these interviews provide new evidence about the positive and negative aspects of working as a speech-language pathologist, and provide preliminary insights into potential reasons as to why speech-language pathologists choose to remain in or leave the profession.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-168
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Speech-language pathologists' views on attrition from the profession'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this