Strategic use of weed legislation to limit the spread of weeds in NSW

Paul Downey, Stephen Johnson

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    Abstract

    Although the NSW Noxious Weeds Act 1993 outlines a list of noxious weed species, these listings have not been used strategically to manage weed species from a state-wide perspective (i.e. to contain their spread). Using the following weed species: (1) cats claw creeper, (2) bridal creeper, (3) African olive and (4) fireweed, we illustrate how the declaration process, being a combination of the declared control areas (DCAs) and Control Classes (CCs) for individual species, can be used strategically to establish state-wide containment zones. Firstly, we overlaid the current distribution pattern for each taxa with the current DCA listings to highlight the degree of mismatch. Then, for each taxa, we systematically assigned each of the ‘unlisted’ DCAs with one of three CCs, being (i) eradication; (ii) suppression (containment) and (iii) asset protection, or left them as ‘unlisted’ for DCAs that are unlikely to be invaded. The selection of the CC for each DCA was based on its proximity to the current infestation, with DCAs covering core infestations assigned an asset-protection class, suppression assigned to those DCAs along the edge of the taxa’s distribution (i.e. with low density or scattered infestations), and eradication to all adjoining DCAs currently without the taxa or where it is scarce. The proposed approach will strategically limit the spread of listed weed species without the need for significant additional resources, simply by (i) raising awareness of the weed species with local stakeholders where it is absent or scarce, and (ii) ensuring that suppression and monitoring occurs in areas with low densities. Whilst the proposed change requires the support of local control authorities, we believe that a more comprehensive and strategic approach to containment of listed species will have direct benefits for all stakeholders. The underlying approach can also be applied to other jurisdictions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAWC Proceedings: 17th Australasian Weeds Conference (2010)
    Place of PublicationNew Zealand
    PublisherNew Zealand Plant Protection Society
    Pages478-481
    Number of pages4
    Volume1
    Publication statusPublished - 2010
    Event17th Australasian Weeds Conference: New Frontiers in New Zealand - Christchurch, New Zealand
    Duration: 26 Sep 201030 Sep 2010

    Conference

    Conference17th Australasian Weeds Conference: New Frontiers in New Zealand
    CountryNew Zealand
    CityChristchurch
    Period26/09/1030/09/10

    Fingerprint

    laws and regulations
    weeds
    noxious weeds
    assets
    stakeholders
    claws
    cats
    monitoring

    Cite this

    Downey, P., & Johnson, S. (2010). Strategic use of weed legislation to limit the spread of weeds in NSW. In AWC Proceedings: 17th Australasian Weeds Conference (2010) (Vol. 1, pp. 478-481). New Zealand: New Zealand Plant Protection Society.
    Downey, Paul ; Johnson, Stephen. / Strategic use of weed legislation to limit the spread of weeds in NSW. AWC Proceedings: 17th Australasian Weeds Conference (2010). Vol. 1 New Zealand : New Zealand Plant Protection Society, 2010. pp. 478-481
    @inproceedings{d795cf345a254338ab694d59d2ed1e00,
    title = "Strategic use of weed legislation to limit the spread of weeds in NSW",
    abstract = "Although the NSW Noxious Weeds Act 1993 outlines a list of noxious weed species, these listings have not been used strategically to manage weed species from a state-wide perspective (i.e. to contain their spread). Using the following weed species: (1) cats claw creeper, (2) bridal creeper, (3) African olive and (4) fireweed, we illustrate how the declaration process, being a combination of the declared control areas (DCAs) and Control Classes (CCs) for individual species, can be used strategically to establish state-wide containment zones. Firstly, we overlaid the current distribution pattern for each taxa with the current DCA listings to highlight the degree of mismatch. Then, for each taxa, we systematically assigned each of the ‘unlisted’ DCAs with one of three CCs, being (i) eradication; (ii) suppression (containment) and (iii) asset protection, or left them as ‘unlisted’ for DCAs that are unlikely to be invaded. The selection of the CC for each DCA was based on its proximity to the current infestation, with DCAs covering core infestations assigned an asset-protection class, suppression assigned to those DCAs along the edge of the taxa’s distribution (i.e. with low density or scattered infestations), and eradication to all adjoining DCAs currently without the taxa or where it is scarce. The proposed approach will strategically limit the spread of listed weed species without the need for significant additional resources, simply by (i) raising awareness of the weed species with local stakeholders where it is absent or scarce, and (ii) ensuring that suppression and monitoring occurs in areas with low densities. Whilst the proposed change requires the support of local control authorities, we believe that a more comprehensive and strategic approach to containment of listed species will have direct benefits for all stakeholders. The underlying approach can also be applied to other jurisdictions.",
    author = "Paul Downey and Stephen Johnson",
    year = "2010",
    language = "English",
    volume = "1",
    pages = "478--481",
    booktitle = "AWC Proceedings: 17th Australasian Weeds Conference (2010)",
    publisher = "New Zealand Plant Protection Society",
    address = "New Zealand",

    }

    Downey, P & Johnson, S 2010, Strategic use of weed legislation to limit the spread of weeds in NSW. in AWC Proceedings: 17th Australasian Weeds Conference (2010). vol. 1, New Zealand Plant Protection Society, New Zealand, pp. 478-481, 17th Australasian Weeds Conference: New Frontiers in New Zealand, Christchurch, New Zealand, 26/09/10.

    Strategic use of weed legislation to limit the spread of weeds in NSW. / Downey, Paul; Johnson, Stephen.

    AWC Proceedings: 17th Australasian Weeds Conference (2010). Vol. 1 New Zealand : New Zealand Plant Protection Society, 2010. p. 478-481.

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Strategic use of weed legislation to limit the spread of weeds in NSW

    AU - Downey, Paul

    AU - Johnson, Stephen

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - Although the NSW Noxious Weeds Act 1993 outlines a list of noxious weed species, these listings have not been used strategically to manage weed species from a state-wide perspective (i.e. to contain their spread). Using the following weed species: (1) cats claw creeper, (2) bridal creeper, (3) African olive and (4) fireweed, we illustrate how the declaration process, being a combination of the declared control areas (DCAs) and Control Classes (CCs) for individual species, can be used strategically to establish state-wide containment zones. Firstly, we overlaid the current distribution pattern for each taxa with the current DCA listings to highlight the degree of mismatch. Then, for each taxa, we systematically assigned each of the ‘unlisted’ DCAs with one of three CCs, being (i) eradication; (ii) suppression (containment) and (iii) asset protection, or left them as ‘unlisted’ for DCAs that are unlikely to be invaded. The selection of the CC for each DCA was based on its proximity to the current infestation, with DCAs covering core infestations assigned an asset-protection class, suppression assigned to those DCAs along the edge of the taxa’s distribution (i.e. with low density or scattered infestations), and eradication to all adjoining DCAs currently without the taxa or where it is scarce. The proposed approach will strategically limit the spread of listed weed species without the need for significant additional resources, simply by (i) raising awareness of the weed species with local stakeholders where it is absent or scarce, and (ii) ensuring that suppression and monitoring occurs in areas with low densities. Whilst the proposed change requires the support of local control authorities, we believe that a more comprehensive and strategic approach to containment of listed species will have direct benefits for all stakeholders. The underlying approach can also be applied to other jurisdictions.

    AB - Although the NSW Noxious Weeds Act 1993 outlines a list of noxious weed species, these listings have not been used strategically to manage weed species from a state-wide perspective (i.e. to contain their spread). Using the following weed species: (1) cats claw creeper, (2) bridal creeper, (3) African olive and (4) fireweed, we illustrate how the declaration process, being a combination of the declared control areas (DCAs) and Control Classes (CCs) for individual species, can be used strategically to establish state-wide containment zones. Firstly, we overlaid the current distribution pattern for each taxa with the current DCA listings to highlight the degree of mismatch. Then, for each taxa, we systematically assigned each of the ‘unlisted’ DCAs with one of three CCs, being (i) eradication; (ii) suppression (containment) and (iii) asset protection, or left them as ‘unlisted’ for DCAs that are unlikely to be invaded. The selection of the CC for each DCA was based on its proximity to the current infestation, with DCAs covering core infestations assigned an asset-protection class, suppression assigned to those DCAs along the edge of the taxa’s distribution (i.e. with low density or scattered infestations), and eradication to all adjoining DCAs currently without the taxa or where it is scarce. The proposed approach will strategically limit the spread of listed weed species without the need for significant additional resources, simply by (i) raising awareness of the weed species with local stakeholders where it is absent or scarce, and (ii) ensuring that suppression and monitoring occurs in areas with low densities. Whilst the proposed change requires the support of local control authorities, we believe that a more comprehensive and strategic approach to containment of listed species will have direct benefits for all stakeholders. The underlying approach can also be applied to other jurisdictions.

    M3 - Conference contribution

    VL - 1

    SP - 478

    EP - 481

    BT - AWC Proceedings: 17th Australasian Weeds Conference (2010)

    PB - New Zealand Plant Protection Society

    CY - New Zealand

    ER -

    Downey P, Johnson S. Strategic use of weed legislation to limit the spread of weeds in NSW. In AWC Proceedings: 17th Australasian Weeds Conference (2010). Vol. 1. New Zealand: New Zealand Plant Protection Society. 2010. p. 478-481