TY - JOUR
T1 - Stream distance and vegetation structure are among the major factors affecting various groups of arthropods in non-riparian chestnut forests
AU - Albacete, Sergio
AU - Mac Nally, Ralph
AU - Carles-Tolra, Miguel
AU - Domenech, Marc
AU - Vives, Eduard
AU - Espadaler, Xavier
AU - Pujade-Villar, Juli
AU - Serra, Antoni
AU - Maceda-Veiga, Alberto
N1 - Funding Information:
S.A. and A.M.V. contributed equally to this study. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers and the handling editor María Elena Fernández for their useful suggestions. AMV dedicated this work to his uncle Bautista Veiga (“Braulio”) who passed away shortly before the surveys of this study began. We thank all forest owners and the family of AMV for helping with the logistics of the field surveys. We also thank the taxonomical assistance of F. Mestres (Drosophila suzukii), A.C. Pont (Phaonia pallida), X. Font (plants), I. Soriano (plants) and L.C. Crespo (spiders). This study sets the foundations of the future ‘Centro de Investigaciones Agro-Fluviales O Incio’.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2020/3/15
Y1 - 2020/3/15
N2 - Streams are likely to be increasingly important for the conservation of non-riparian forest diversity with increased aridity due to climate change in many parts of the world. However, the importance of streams as promoters of non-riparian forest diversity has not been explored in detail. Given the likely stronger effect of surrounding habitats on open forests, we examined chestnut woodlands in northern Spain (n = 32) to explore the contribution of streams to variation in arthropod measures. We captured 5,490 arthropods (21 orders and 60 families) from which we calculated total abundance and richness and the abundance of trophic guilds. Vegetation structure at the tree and understory levels often made the largest independent contributions to explained variation in arthropod numbers and effects suggested alterations in arthropods' food-web. Negative effects of stream-distance on taxon richness and the abundance of predators, omnivores and phytophages seemed to be largely mediated by vegetation structure. The exception was a strong univariate inverse association between the abundance of aerial predators and stream distance, possibly because wasps might be exploiting riverine habitats. Overall, effects of stream-distance were weaker for ground than for aerial arthropod groups. Moreover, arthropod numbers were greater at sites with low tree species richness and tall and species-rich understories, raising concerns for the ecological consequences of the abandonment of traditional forest practices in these woodlands. There are likely to be advantages for arthropod diversity and ecosystem services (e.g. pest control, nutrient cycling, pollination) if non-riparian forests are managed in a way that depends on stream-distance. Inferences may improve with a more complete knowledge of the biology of poorly studied groups, such as flies.
AB - Streams are likely to be increasingly important for the conservation of non-riparian forest diversity with increased aridity due to climate change in many parts of the world. However, the importance of streams as promoters of non-riparian forest diversity has not been explored in detail. Given the likely stronger effect of surrounding habitats on open forests, we examined chestnut woodlands in northern Spain (n = 32) to explore the contribution of streams to variation in arthropod measures. We captured 5,490 arthropods (21 orders and 60 families) from which we calculated total abundance and richness and the abundance of trophic guilds. Vegetation structure at the tree and understory levels often made the largest independent contributions to explained variation in arthropod numbers and effects suggested alterations in arthropods' food-web. Negative effects of stream-distance on taxon richness and the abundance of predators, omnivores and phytophages seemed to be largely mediated by vegetation structure. The exception was a strong univariate inverse association between the abundance of aerial predators and stream distance, possibly because wasps might be exploiting riverine habitats. Overall, effects of stream-distance were weaker for ground than for aerial arthropod groups. Moreover, arthropod numbers were greater at sites with low tree species richness and tall and species-rich understories, raising concerns for the ecological consequences of the abandonment of traditional forest practices in these woodlands. There are likely to be advantages for arthropod diversity and ecosystem services (e.g. pest control, nutrient cycling, pollination) if non-riparian forests are managed in a way that depends on stream-distance. Inferences may improve with a more complete knowledge of the biology of poorly studied groups, such as flies.
KW - Arthropods
KW - Trophic guilds
KW - Rural abandonment
KW - Tree richness
KW - Understory development
KW - Leaf litter
KW - Streams
KW - Woodlands
KW - Old-growth trees
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078505874&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117860
DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117860
M3 - Article
SN - 0378-1127
VL - 460
SP - 1
EP - 3
JO - Forest Ecology and Management
JF - Forest Ecology and Management
M1 - 117860
ER -