Stretch and activation of the human biarticular hamstrings across a range of running speeds

Anthony G. Schache, Tim W. Dorn, Tim V. Wrigley, Nicholas A T Brown, Marcus G. Pandy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The human biarticular hamstrings [semimembranosus (SM), semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris long head (BFLH)] have an important role in running. This study determined how hamstrings neuro-mechanical behaviour changed with faster running, and whether differences existed between SM, ST and BFLH. Methods: Whole-body kinematics and hamstrings electromyographic (EMG) activity were measured from seven participants running at four discrete speeds (range: 3.4 ± 0.1 to 9.0 ± 0.7 m/s). Kinematic data were combined with a three-dimensional musculoskeletal model to calculate muscle-tendon unit (MTU) stretch and velocity. Activation duration and magnitude were determined from EMG data. Results: With faster running, MTU stretch and velocity patterns remained similar, but maxima and minima significantly increased. The hamstrings were activated from foot-strike until terminal stance or early swing, and then again from mid-swing until foot-strike. Activation duration was similar with faster running, whereas activation magnitude significantly increased. Hamstrings activation almost always ended before minimum MTU stretch, and it always started before maximum MTU stretch. Comparing the hamstrings, maximum MTU stretch was largest for BFLH and smallest for ST irrespective of running speed, while the opposite was true for peak-to-peak MTU stretch. Furthermore, peak MTU shortening velocity was largest for ST and smallest for BFLH at all running speeds. Finally, for the two fastest running speeds, the amount of MTU stretch that occurred during terminal swing after activation had started was less for BFLH compared to SM and ST. Conclusion: Differences were evident in biarticular hamstrings neuro-mechanical behaviour during running. Such findings have implications for hamstrings function and injury.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2813-2828
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume113
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Running
Tendons
Muscles
Hamstring Muscles
Biomechanical Phenomena
Foot

Cite this

Schache, Anthony G. ; Dorn, Tim W. ; Wrigley, Tim V. ; Brown, Nicholas A T ; Pandy, Marcus G. / Stretch and activation of the human biarticular hamstrings across a range of running speeds. In: European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2013 ; Vol. 113, No. 11. pp. 2813-2828.
@article{f352ad3ecf914014af1c0bf2a0a2dc10,
title = "Stretch and activation of the human biarticular hamstrings across a range of running speeds",
abstract = "Purpose: The human biarticular hamstrings [semimembranosus (SM), semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris long head (BFLH)] have an important role in running. This study determined how hamstrings neuro-mechanical behaviour changed with faster running, and whether differences existed between SM, ST and BFLH. Methods: Whole-body kinematics and hamstrings electromyographic (EMG) activity were measured from seven participants running at four discrete speeds (range: 3.4 ± 0.1 to 9.0 ± 0.7 m/s). Kinematic data were combined with a three-dimensional musculoskeletal model to calculate muscle-tendon unit (MTU) stretch and velocity. Activation duration and magnitude were determined from EMG data. Results: With faster running, MTU stretch and velocity patterns remained similar, but maxima and minima significantly increased. The hamstrings were activated from foot-strike until terminal stance or early swing, and then again from mid-swing until foot-strike. Activation duration was similar with faster running, whereas activation magnitude significantly increased. Hamstrings activation almost always ended before minimum MTU stretch, and it always started before maximum MTU stretch. Comparing the hamstrings, maximum MTU stretch was largest for BFLH and smallest for ST irrespective of running speed, while the opposite was true for peak-to-peak MTU stretch. Furthermore, peak MTU shortening velocity was largest for ST and smallest for BFLH at all running speeds. Finally, for the two fastest running speeds, the amount of MTU stretch that occurred during terminal swing after activation had started was less for BFLH compared to SM and ST. Conclusion: Differences were evident in biarticular hamstrings neuro-mechanical behaviour during running. Such findings have implications for hamstrings function and injury.",
keywords = "Biceps femoris long head, Eccentric contraction, Muscle strain-type injury, Sprinting",
author = "Schache, {Anthony G.} and Dorn, {Tim W.} and Wrigley, {Tim V.} and Brown, {Nicholas A T} and Pandy, {Marcus G.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00421-013-2713-9",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "2813--2828",
journal = "European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology",
issn = "1439-6319",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "11",

}

Stretch and activation of the human biarticular hamstrings across a range of running speeds. / Schache, Anthony G.; Dorn, Tim W.; Wrigley, Tim V.; Brown, Nicholas A T; Pandy, Marcus G.

In: European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 113, No. 11, 01.11.2013, p. 2813-2828.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stretch and activation of the human biarticular hamstrings across a range of running speeds

AU - Schache, Anthony G.

AU - Dorn, Tim W.

AU - Wrigley, Tim V.

AU - Brown, Nicholas A T

AU - Pandy, Marcus G.

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - Purpose: The human biarticular hamstrings [semimembranosus (SM), semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris long head (BFLH)] have an important role in running. This study determined how hamstrings neuro-mechanical behaviour changed with faster running, and whether differences existed between SM, ST and BFLH. Methods: Whole-body kinematics and hamstrings electromyographic (EMG) activity were measured from seven participants running at four discrete speeds (range: 3.4 ± 0.1 to 9.0 ± 0.7 m/s). Kinematic data were combined with a three-dimensional musculoskeletal model to calculate muscle-tendon unit (MTU) stretch and velocity. Activation duration and magnitude were determined from EMG data. Results: With faster running, MTU stretch and velocity patterns remained similar, but maxima and minima significantly increased. The hamstrings were activated from foot-strike until terminal stance or early swing, and then again from mid-swing until foot-strike. Activation duration was similar with faster running, whereas activation magnitude significantly increased. Hamstrings activation almost always ended before minimum MTU stretch, and it always started before maximum MTU stretch. Comparing the hamstrings, maximum MTU stretch was largest for BFLH and smallest for ST irrespective of running speed, while the opposite was true for peak-to-peak MTU stretch. Furthermore, peak MTU shortening velocity was largest for ST and smallest for BFLH at all running speeds. Finally, for the two fastest running speeds, the amount of MTU stretch that occurred during terminal swing after activation had started was less for BFLH compared to SM and ST. Conclusion: Differences were evident in biarticular hamstrings neuro-mechanical behaviour during running. Such findings have implications for hamstrings function and injury.

AB - Purpose: The human biarticular hamstrings [semimembranosus (SM), semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris long head (BFLH)] have an important role in running. This study determined how hamstrings neuro-mechanical behaviour changed with faster running, and whether differences existed between SM, ST and BFLH. Methods: Whole-body kinematics and hamstrings electromyographic (EMG) activity were measured from seven participants running at four discrete speeds (range: 3.4 ± 0.1 to 9.0 ± 0.7 m/s). Kinematic data were combined with a three-dimensional musculoskeletal model to calculate muscle-tendon unit (MTU) stretch and velocity. Activation duration and magnitude were determined from EMG data. Results: With faster running, MTU stretch and velocity patterns remained similar, but maxima and minima significantly increased. The hamstrings were activated from foot-strike until terminal stance or early swing, and then again from mid-swing until foot-strike. Activation duration was similar with faster running, whereas activation magnitude significantly increased. Hamstrings activation almost always ended before minimum MTU stretch, and it always started before maximum MTU stretch. Comparing the hamstrings, maximum MTU stretch was largest for BFLH and smallest for ST irrespective of running speed, while the opposite was true for peak-to-peak MTU stretch. Furthermore, peak MTU shortening velocity was largest for ST and smallest for BFLH at all running speeds. Finally, for the two fastest running speeds, the amount of MTU stretch that occurred during terminal swing after activation had started was less for BFLH compared to SM and ST. Conclusion: Differences were evident in biarticular hamstrings neuro-mechanical behaviour during running. Such findings have implications for hamstrings function and injury.

KW - Biceps femoris long head

KW - Eccentric contraction

KW - Muscle strain-type injury

KW - Sprinting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886100844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00421-013-2713-9

DO - 10.1007/s00421-013-2713-9

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 2813

EP - 2828

JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology

JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology

SN - 1439-6319

IS - 11

ER -