Student acceptance of e-learning methods in the laboratory class in Optometry

Monica Acosta, Aran Sisley, Jacqueline Ross, Ian Brailsford, Robert J. Jacobs, Nicola ANSTICE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Today’s students have increased expectations for flexible learning options and evidence-based practice resources to be available to support curricular activities. We investigated: (i) the suitability of a static website for teaching ocular anatomy and physiology and an interactive version of the website with quiz and self-assessment activities and (ii) the usefulness of a blended online and in-lab environment to teach in Optometry. We administered a survey to compare responses of optometry students who had access to the interactive website, with those from students from a previous year who used the static version. We examined learning preferences of students in a focus group. Students were positive about the value of the website for their learning and the clarity of the website content. Nevertheless, objective comparison of pass rates for students using the static and interactive websites did not show significant changes. The majority of students commenting on the static website felt they did not get sufficient feedback via the website (67%) compared with only 22% from students who used self-assessments in the interactive website. Interestingly, users of the static website commented that it was perceived as just another resource while users of the interactive website commented on the usefulness of the material to review knowledge before laboratories. In the focus group, students reported they preferred a blended learning over the website alone even by students using the interactive website as they felt the need to revise content with the educator before the test. We conclude that there is acceptance of online learning methods due to the technologically ‘savvy’ environment of students in the first year of the Optometry programme but there is still dependence on the educator as the main administrator of their learning.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0209004
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalPLoS One
Volume13
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

online courses
Optometry
laboratory techniques
Websites
students
Learning
Students
learning
focus groups
Focus Groups
teachers
Ocular Physiological Phenomena
Evidence-Based Practice
Administrative Personnel
Physiology
Anatomy
Teaching

Cite this

Acosta, M., Sisley, A., Ross, J., Brailsford, I., Jacobs, R. J., & ANSTICE, N. (2018). Student acceptance of e-learning methods in the laboratory class in Optometry. PLoS One, 13(12), 1-10. [e0209004]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209004
Acosta, Monica ; Sisley, Aran ; Ross, Jacqueline ; Brailsford, Ian ; Jacobs, Robert J. ; ANSTICE, Nicola. / Student acceptance of e-learning methods in the laboratory class in Optometry. In: PLoS One. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 12. pp. 1-10.
@article{a1d6fc0edcb04ef18a47fccb86e2b31b,
title = "Student acceptance of e-learning methods in the laboratory class in Optometry",
abstract = "Today’s students have increased expectations for flexible learning options and evidence-based practice resources to be available to support curricular activities. We investigated: (i) the suitability of a static website for teaching ocular anatomy and physiology and an interactive version of the website with quiz and self-assessment activities and (ii) the usefulness of a blended online and in-lab environment to teach in Optometry. We administered a survey to compare responses of optometry students who had access to the interactive website, with those from students from a previous year who used the static version. We examined learning preferences of students in a focus group. Students were positive about the value of the website for their learning and the clarity of the website content. Nevertheless, objective comparison of pass rates for students using the static and interactive websites did not show significant changes. The majority of students commenting on the static website felt they did not get sufficient feedback via the website (67{\%}) compared with only 22{\%} from students who used self-assessments in the interactive website. Interestingly, users of the static website commented that it was perceived as just another resource while users of the interactive website commented on the usefulness of the material to review knowledge before laboratories. In the focus group, students reported they preferred a blended learning over the website alone even by students using the interactive website as they felt the need to revise content with the educator before the test. We conclude that there is acceptance of online learning methods due to the technologically ‘savvy’ environment of students in the first year of the Optometry programme but there is still dependence on the educator as the main administrator of their learning.",
keywords = "Attitude, Education, Distance, Focus Groups, Humans, Internet, Optometry/education, Students/psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, User-Computer Interface",
author = "Monica Acosta and Aran Sisley and Jacqueline Ross and Ian Brailsford and Jacobs, {Robert J.} and Nicola ANSTICE",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0209004",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "12",

}

Acosta, M, Sisley, A, Ross, J, Brailsford, I, Jacobs, RJ & ANSTICE, N 2018, 'Student acceptance of e-learning methods in the laboratory class in Optometry', PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 12, e0209004, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209004

Student acceptance of e-learning methods in the laboratory class in Optometry. / Acosta, Monica; Sisley, Aran; Ross, Jacqueline; Brailsford, Ian; Jacobs, Robert J.; ANSTICE, Nicola.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 13, No. 12, e0209004, 2018, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Student acceptance of e-learning methods in the laboratory class in Optometry

AU - Acosta, Monica

AU - Sisley, Aran

AU - Ross, Jacqueline

AU - Brailsford, Ian

AU - Jacobs, Robert J.

AU - ANSTICE, Nicola

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Today’s students have increased expectations for flexible learning options and evidence-based practice resources to be available to support curricular activities. We investigated: (i) the suitability of a static website for teaching ocular anatomy and physiology and an interactive version of the website with quiz and self-assessment activities and (ii) the usefulness of a blended online and in-lab environment to teach in Optometry. We administered a survey to compare responses of optometry students who had access to the interactive website, with those from students from a previous year who used the static version. We examined learning preferences of students in a focus group. Students were positive about the value of the website for their learning and the clarity of the website content. Nevertheless, objective comparison of pass rates for students using the static and interactive websites did not show significant changes. The majority of students commenting on the static website felt they did not get sufficient feedback via the website (67%) compared with only 22% from students who used self-assessments in the interactive website. Interestingly, users of the static website commented that it was perceived as just another resource while users of the interactive website commented on the usefulness of the material to review knowledge before laboratories. In the focus group, students reported they preferred a blended learning over the website alone even by students using the interactive website as they felt the need to revise content with the educator before the test. We conclude that there is acceptance of online learning methods due to the technologically ‘savvy’ environment of students in the first year of the Optometry programme but there is still dependence on the educator as the main administrator of their learning.

AB - Today’s students have increased expectations for flexible learning options and evidence-based practice resources to be available to support curricular activities. We investigated: (i) the suitability of a static website for teaching ocular anatomy and physiology and an interactive version of the website with quiz and self-assessment activities and (ii) the usefulness of a blended online and in-lab environment to teach in Optometry. We administered a survey to compare responses of optometry students who had access to the interactive website, with those from students from a previous year who used the static version. We examined learning preferences of students in a focus group. Students were positive about the value of the website for their learning and the clarity of the website content. Nevertheless, objective comparison of pass rates for students using the static and interactive websites did not show significant changes. The majority of students commenting on the static website felt they did not get sufficient feedback via the website (67%) compared with only 22% from students who used self-assessments in the interactive website. Interestingly, users of the static website commented that it was perceived as just another resource while users of the interactive website commented on the usefulness of the material to review knowledge before laboratories. In the focus group, students reported they preferred a blended learning over the website alone even by students using the interactive website as they felt the need to revise content with the educator before the test. We conclude that there is acceptance of online learning methods due to the technologically ‘savvy’ environment of students in the first year of the Optometry programme but there is still dependence on the educator as the main administrator of their learning.

KW - Attitude

KW - Education, Distance

KW - Focus Groups

KW - Humans

KW - Internet

KW - Optometry/education

KW - Students/psychology

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - User-Computer Interface

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058461364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/student-acceptance-elearning-methods-laboratory-class-optometry

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0209004

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0209004

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 12

M1 - e0209004

ER -