TY - JOUR
T1 - Support for climate-driven migration in Australia : testing an ideology-based threat model
AU - Stanley, Samantha
AU - Leviston, Zoe
AU - Ng Tseung-Wong, Caroline
N1 - Funding Information:
Data collection for Study 2 was supported with funding from the Research School of Psychology at the Australian National University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - We examine Australians’ preferences for resettling people displaced by climate change from overseas (‘climate refugees’), from within Australia (‘internal climate refugees’), and people displaced by war. Across three studies (Study 1 N = 467, Study 2 N = 1679, Study 3 N = 492), our findings reveal greater support for resettling refugee groups already residing in the nation: internal climate refugees and refugees of war. Although support for all three groups was reasonably high, participants were consistently and significantly less supportive of resettling international climate refugees. Both groups of international refugees (relocating due to war or climate changes) were viewed as posing greater threat than internally displaced Australians. Endorsement of right-wing ideological attitudes predicted lower support for climate refugees, which was mediated by symbolic and realistic threat perceptions. These findings highlight the potential of ideology, economic and cultural concerns to undermine support for resettling those displaced by climate change.
AB - We examine Australians’ preferences for resettling people displaced by climate change from overseas (‘climate refugees’), from within Australia (‘internal climate refugees’), and people displaced by war. Across three studies (Study 1 N = 467, Study 2 N = 1679, Study 3 N = 492), our findings reveal greater support for resettling refugee groups already residing in the nation: internal climate refugees and refugees of war. Although support for all three groups was reasonably high, participants were consistently and significantly less supportive of resettling international climate refugees. Both groups of international refugees (relocating due to war or climate changes) were viewed as posing greater threat than internally displaced Australians. Endorsement of right-wing ideological attitudes predicted lower support for climate refugees, which was mediated by symbolic and realistic threat perceptions. These findings highlight the potential of ideology, economic and cultural concerns to undermine support for resettling those displaced by climate change.
KW - Climate refugee
KW - Climate-driven migration
KW - Intergroup threat theory
KW - Right-wing authoritarianism
KW - Social dominance orientation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161340764&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100119
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100119
M3 - Special issue
VL - 4
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
JF - Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
M1 - 100119
ER -