Symposium commentary: Reflections on the theory of deliberative systems

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    I address some of the strengths and weaknesses of the deliberative systems approach identified by the contributors to this special issue on the theory of deliberative systems. Their contributions signal significant advance in the approach. These papers show once again that deliberative democracy as a field is very good at recognizing and remedying its own shortcomings, as well as reformulating itself in response to critics.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)209-215
    Number of pages7
    JournalCritical Policy Studies
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    deliberative democracy
    critic

    Cite this

    @article{dda61f4ffbec4531ad5bb30679bab3f9,
    title = "Symposium commentary: Reflections on the theory of deliberative systems",
    abstract = "I address some of the strengths and weaknesses of the deliberative systems approach identified by the contributors to this special issue on the theory of deliberative systems. Their contributions signal significant advance in the approach. These papers show once again that deliberative democracy as a field is very good at recognizing and remedying its own shortcomings, as well as reformulating itself in response to critics.",
    author = "John DRYZEK",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1080/19460171.2016.1170620",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "209--215",
    journal = "Critical Policy Studies",
    issn = "1946-0171",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "2",

    }

    Symposium commentary: Reflections on the theory of deliberative systems. / DRYZEK, John.

    In: Critical Policy Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2016, p. 209-215.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Symposium commentary: Reflections on the theory of deliberative systems

    AU - DRYZEK, John

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - I address some of the strengths and weaknesses of the deliberative systems approach identified by the contributors to this special issue on the theory of deliberative systems. Their contributions signal significant advance in the approach. These papers show once again that deliberative democracy as a field is very good at recognizing and remedying its own shortcomings, as well as reformulating itself in response to critics.

    AB - I address some of the strengths and weaknesses of the deliberative systems approach identified by the contributors to this special issue on the theory of deliberative systems. Their contributions signal significant advance in the approach. These papers show once again that deliberative democracy as a field is very good at recognizing and remedying its own shortcomings, as well as reformulating itself in response to critics.

    U2 - 10.1080/19460171.2016.1170620

    DO - 10.1080/19460171.2016.1170620

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 209

    EP - 215

    JO - Critical Policy Studies

    JF - Critical Policy Studies

    SN - 1946-0171

    IS - 2

    ER -