Synchronizing relational benefits with customer commitment profiles

Johra FATIMA, Rita Di Mascio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The literature no longer considers commitment to be a distinct variable. Instead, commitment represents a combination of affective, calculative, and normative dimensions for individual customers, resulting in the adoption of a person-centric view for its measurement. However, customer satisfaction as a result of confidence benefit, social benefit, and special treatment benefit may vary among customers with different commitment profiles which encourages variable-centric view. Considering both variable- and person-centric views, this study uses survey data to examine the impact of relational benefits on the satisfaction of customers with different commitment profiles. It also examines the moderation role of relationship age. With cluster analysis identifying three commitment profiles, findings from structural equation modeling confirmed that highly-committed customers expected excessive special treatment benefit; low-commitment customers preferred confidence benefit to reduce cognitive dissonance; while affective dominance customers expected all three types of benefit proportionately. The study’s theoretical and practical contributions conclude the paper.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Strategic Marketing
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 May 2019

Fingerprint

Relational benefits
Customer commitment
Confidence
Social benefits
Customer satisfaction
Survey data
Cognitive dissonance
Moderation
Cluster analysis
Structural equation modeling

Cite this

@article{d0a663e380e143389f43cd8bb4612f0b,
title = "Synchronizing relational benefits with customer commitment profiles",
abstract = "The literature no longer considers commitment to be a distinct variable. Instead, commitment represents a combination of affective, calculative, and normative dimensions for individual customers, resulting in the adoption of a person-centric view for its measurement. However, customer satisfaction as a result of confidence benefit, social benefit, and special treatment benefit may vary among customers with different commitment profiles which encourages variable-centric view. Considering both variable- and person-centric views, this study uses survey data to examine the impact of relational benefits on the satisfaction of customers with different commitment profiles. It also examines the moderation role of relationship age. With cluster analysis identifying three commitment profiles, findings from structural equation modeling confirmed that highly-committed customers expected excessive special treatment benefit; low-commitment customers preferred confidence benefit to reduce cognitive dissonance; while affective dominance customers expected all three types of benefit proportionately. The study’s theoretical and practical contributions conclude the paper.",
keywords = "cluster analysis, Commitment, customer satisfaction, relational benefits, structural equation modeling",
author = "Johra FATIMA and {Di Mascio}, Rita",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1080/0965254X.2019.1619089",
language = "English",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Journal of Strategic Marketing",
issn = "0965-254X",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Synchronizing relational benefits with customer commitment profiles. / FATIMA, Johra; Di Mascio, Rita.

In: Journal of Strategic Marketing, 22.05.2019, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Synchronizing relational benefits with customer commitment profiles

AU - FATIMA, Johra

AU - Di Mascio, Rita

PY - 2019/5/22

Y1 - 2019/5/22

N2 - The literature no longer considers commitment to be a distinct variable. Instead, commitment represents a combination of affective, calculative, and normative dimensions for individual customers, resulting in the adoption of a person-centric view for its measurement. However, customer satisfaction as a result of confidence benefit, social benefit, and special treatment benefit may vary among customers with different commitment profiles which encourages variable-centric view. Considering both variable- and person-centric views, this study uses survey data to examine the impact of relational benefits on the satisfaction of customers with different commitment profiles. It also examines the moderation role of relationship age. With cluster analysis identifying three commitment profiles, findings from structural equation modeling confirmed that highly-committed customers expected excessive special treatment benefit; low-commitment customers preferred confidence benefit to reduce cognitive dissonance; while affective dominance customers expected all three types of benefit proportionately. The study’s theoretical and practical contributions conclude the paper.

AB - The literature no longer considers commitment to be a distinct variable. Instead, commitment represents a combination of affective, calculative, and normative dimensions for individual customers, resulting in the adoption of a person-centric view for its measurement. However, customer satisfaction as a result of confidence benefit, social benefit, and special treatment benefit may vary among customers with different commitment profiles which encourages variable-centric view. Considering both variable- and person-centric views, this study uses survey data to examine the impact of relational benefits on the satisfaction of customers with different commitment profiles. It also examines the moderation role of relationship age. With cluster analysis identifying three commitment profiles, findings from structural equation modeling confirmed that highly-committed customers expected excessive special treatment benefit; low-commitment customers preferred confidence benefit to reduce cognitive dissonance; while affective dominance customers expected all three types of benefit proportionately. The study’s theoretical and practical contributions conclude the paper.

KW - cluster analysis

KW - Commitment

KW - customer satisfaction

KW - relational benefits

KW - structural equation modeling

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0965254X.2019.1619089

U2 - 10.1080/0965254X.2019.1619089

DO - 10.1080/0965254X.2019.1619089

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Journal of Strategic Marketing

JF - Journal of Strategic Marketing

SN - 0965-254X

ER -